ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To present the interim findings from a national study investigating the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP) containing detectable IgG antibodies as a treatment strategy for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). TRIAL DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: An open label, two-arm, phase-II clinical trial conducted across 22 hospitals from Saudi Arabia. The intervention group included 40 adults (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed severe COVID-19 and the control group included 124 patients matched using propensity score for age, gender, intubation status, and history of diabetes and/or hypertension. Intervention group included those (a) with severe symptoms (dyspnea; respiratory rate, ≥30/min; SpO2, ≤93%, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, <300; and/or lung infiltrates >50% within 24-48 h), (b) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) care or (c) experiencing life-threatening conditions. The control group included confirmed severe COVID-19 patients of similar characteristics who did not consent for CP infusion or were not able to receive CP due to its nonavailability. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group participants were infused 300 ml (200-400 ml/treatment dose) CP at least once, and if required, daily for up to 5 sessions, along with receiving the best standard of care. The control group only received the best standard of care. OUTCOMES: The primary endpoints were safety and ICU length of stay (LOS). The secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, days on mechanical ventilation and days to clinical recovery. RESULTS: CP transfusion did not result in any adverse effects. There was no difference in the ICU LOS (median 8 days in both groups). The mortality risk was lower in the CP group: 13% absolute risk reduction (P = 0.147), hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.554 (0.299-1.027; P = 0.061) by log-rank test. There was no significant difference in the days on mechanical ventilation and days to clinical recovery. CONCLUSION: CP containing detectable antibodies is a safe strategy and may result in a decrease in mortality in patients with severe COVID-19. The results of the completed trial with a larger study sample would provide more clarity if this difference in mortality is significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04347681; Saudi Clinical Trials Registry No.: 20041102.
ABSTRACT
Acquired hemophilia A (AH) is a rare and serious acquired bleeding disorder where prompt and correct diagnosis is crucial, and immune suppression is often required for factor VIII (FVIII) autoantibody eradication. The acquired FVIII deficiency usually manifests as bruises and bleeding, and treatment such as FVIII has limited efficacy because of the neutralizing FVIII inhibitor. Expensive bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) may be required to treat clinically significant bleeding. This report summarizes the experience related to AH from a large Australian hemophilia center based in South Australia. We identified 25 patients retrospectively over 12 years (1997 to 2008) and reviewed diagnostic features, treatment for bleeds and to eradicate the autoantibody, treatment response, and survival outcomes. The incidence in South Australia was 1.20 cases per million/year with a median age of 78 years with an approximately equivalent sex ratio (12 males versus 13 females); median FVIII and inhibitor titer were 2.5 IU/dL and 11.0 BU/mL, respectively. Twenty-four patients were evaluated further. Thirteen patients (54%) required hemostatic agents, and rFVIIa was used in seven for major bleeds, of which four were limb or life threatening. Eighteen patients were treated by hematologists with immune suppression, and combination steroid and azathioprine was used most commonly to eradicate autoantibody; 15 of these 18 achieved remission (i.e., 83% response rate). Two patients had persistent low-titer inhibitor when treatments were withdrawn, and one died of a fatal bleed shortly after starting treatment. One had spontaneous remission. Five patients (33%) relapsed, three in less than 6 months after starting treatment; all were retreated successfully. Rituximab was used in six patients for high-titer inhibitor, second relapse, two life-threatening bleeds, underlying lymphoma, and steroid intolerance, respectively. Overall mortality was 25% ( N = 6), five of whom were not treated. Advanced age and lack of treatment were predictive of poor survival outcomes. The very elderly (>75 years of age) may warrant a different treatment modality such as rituximab, which is potentially more tolerable and efficacious.
