ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of altitude level on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for patients with morbid obesity. METHODS: At the normal altitude level, 808 patients underwent LSG, and 467 patients underwent LSG in high-altitude regions. The primary outcome was evaluated based on the postoperative morbidity rate. Secondary outcomes were evaluated based on operating time, mortality, hospital stay, percentage of total weight loss (TWL), and comorbidities improvement. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in-hospital stay, time to start oral intake, gastric leakage, overall complications, and hospital mortality between the 2 groups. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and mesenteric vascular occlusion were significantly higher in high altitude [11 (1.3%) vs. 14 (3%), P=0.04; 8 (0.7%) vs. 11 (2.4%), P=0.01; 4 (0.5%) vs. 8 (1.7%), P=0.03, respectively]. Patients with normal altitude recorded a better %TWL than those at high altitude after 12 months (41±9 vs. 39±9.6, P=0.002) and after 24 months (41±8 vs. 40±9, P=0.009). In both groups, a significant improvement was noted in comorbidity after LSG. CONCLUSION: The %TWL significantly achieved with LSG in normal and high altitudes. After 12 and 24 months, the %TWL is significantly higher with LSG at normal altitudes. High altitude is associated with a high incidence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and superior mesenteric vascular occlusion with LSG.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid , Altitude , Body Mass Index , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Tertiary Healthcare , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Saudi ArabiaABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Dose delivery accuracy at low monitor units (LMU) was evaluated for photon and electron beams. Knowledge of this study is required for few dosimetric applications and to know the dose delivered to the patient when the treatment is delivered with few monitor units (MU). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dose measurements were carried out for photon and electron beams with 0.6 cm(3) PTW ion chamber in white polystyrene phantom at D(max) with a field size of 10 x 10 cm(2) at 100 cm FSD. The relative dose, which is the ratio of dose delivered per MU at the testing to that of the calibration condition, was found out. RESULTS: Significant deviation (+20% to +25%) in dose delivery was noticed for photon and electron beams (+39% to +45%) at LMU settings. Slightly higher inaccuracy in dose delivery was noticed for 6-MV compared to 18-MV photons. The deviation in dose delivery for electron beams was found to be energy-independent and the pattern of variation was similar for all electron energies. CONCLUSION: The dose delivery accuracy at LMU settings has to be ascertained before implementing conformal and IMRT (intensity- modulated radiotherapy) techniques. When there is dose nonlinearity, the treatment delivered with multiple small MU settings can result in significant error in dose delivery.
