Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 97: 105686, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35679746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The etiology of bone refractures after screw removal can be attributed to residual drill hole defects. This biomechanical study compared the torsional strength of bones containing various sized cortical drill defects in a tibia model. METHODS: Bicortical drill hole defects of 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm diameters were tested in 26 composite tibias versus intact controls without a drill defect. Each tibia was secured in alignment with the rotational axis of a materials testing system and the proximal end rotated internally at a rate of 1 deg./s until mechanical failure. FINDINGS: All defect test groups were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in torque-to-failure than the intact group (82.80 ± 3.70 Nm). The 4 mm drill hole group was characterized by a significantly lower (P = 0.021) torque-to-failure (51.00 ± 3.27 Nm) when compared to the 3 mm drill hole (59.00 ± 5.48 Nm) group, but not different than the 5 mm hole group (55.71 ± 5.71 Nm). All bones failed through spiral fractures, bones with defects also exhibited posterior butterfly fragments. INTERPRETATION: All the tested drill hole sizes in this study significantly reduced the torque-to-failure from intact by a range of 28.4% to 38.4%, in agreement with previous similar studies. The 5 mm drill hole represented a 22.7% diameter defect, the 4 mm drill hole a 18.2% diameter defect, and the 3 mm drill hole a 13.6% diameter defect. Clinicians should be cognizant of this diminution of long bone strength after a residual bone defect in their creation and management of patient rehabilitation programs.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Tibia , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Screws , Bone and Bones , Humans , Tibia/surgery , Torque
2.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 30(2): e279-e286, 2022 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34695042

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical navigation technology has recently become more prevalent for total knee arthroplasty. Surgical navigation typically requires pin placement in the proximal tibia diaphysis to stabilize the bone-tracking hardware, and there have been several recent reports of fractures through these residual navigation pin holes. The objective of this biomechanical study was to determine whether a difference exists in the torsional bone strength of a 5-mm navigation pin hole drilled at a single location in three different orientations: unicortical, bicortical, and transcortical. METHODS: Biomechanical composite sawbone tibias were used to test four conditions: the intact condition with no holes, a unicortical hole, a bicortical hole, and a transcortical hole through the proximal diaphysis. Seven specimens from each group were tested in external rotation to failure at 1 deg/sec. Torque-to-failure, absorbed energy-to-failure, and rotational angle-to-failure were statistically compared across the four groups. RESULTS: All specimens failed proximally by spiral oblique fractures. No statistical differences were found between unicortical and bicortical groups in torque-to-failure, energy-to-failure, and angle-to-failure. However, both unicortical and bicortical groups were markedly lower in all measures than the intact group. The transcortical group was markedly lower in all measures than the intact group and both unicortical and bicortical groups. DISCUSSION: An appropriately placed navigation residual pin hole, either unicortical or bicortical, markedly decreases the torque-to-failure, energy-to-failure, and angle-to-failure of the tibia compared with the intact condition in a synthetic sawbones model. No notable difference was detected between the unicortical and bicortical holes; however, an errant transcortical residual navigation pin hole markedly decreases all measures compared with an appropriately placed unicortical or bicortical hole.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Tibia , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Tibia/surgery
3.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 83: 105293, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33588134

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment of tibia diaphyseal fractures with intramedullary nail fixation has proven to be effective. An increasingly popular practice is to coat the nail with bone cement incorporating antibiotics for the purpose of treating and/or preventing infection. To date, the effect of coating on the mechanical performance of the intramedullary nail once implanted is unknown. We hypothesize that cement coating does not change the cross-sectional stiffness of the nail, so that, when fixing tibia diaphyseal fracture with gapping, cement coated intramedullary nail provide stiffness comparable to that of standard conventional uncoated ones. METHODS: Tests of 4-point bending were conducted to compare the cross-sectional stiffness of uncoated to coated nails. In addition, mechanical tests of compression and torsion on tibia bone phantoms instrumented with coated and uncoated nails were performed, and the proximal-to-distal bone fragment rotations were compared. FINDINGS: The 4-point bending tests indicated that the cross-sectional stiffness of coated nails was not significantly different from that of the uncoated ones (p-value >0.05). Mechanical tests of compression and torsion corroborated these results by showing no statistical difference in the proximal-to-distal bone rotations attained with uncoated nails when compared to those measured for the coated ones (p-value >0.05). INTERPRETATION: Cement coating on the nail cannot be relied upon for increased mechanical stiffness of the implant, and should be solely considered as a vehicle for topic delivery of antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Tibial Fractures , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Nails , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Tibial Fractures/surgery
4.
JBMR Plus ; 4(5): e10351, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37780057

ABSTRACT

Mechanical properties and morphological features of the vertebral cancellous bone are related to resistance to fracture and capability of withstanding surgical treatments. In particular, vertebral strength is related to its elastic properties, whereas the ease of fluid motion, related to the success of incorporation orthopedic materials (eg, bone cement), is regulated by the hydraulic permeability (K). It has been shown that both elastic modulus and permeability of a material are affected by its morphology. The objective of this study was to establish relations between local values of K and the aggregate modulus (H), and parameters descriptive of the bone morphology. We hypothesized that multivariate statistical models, by including the contribution of several morphology parameters at once, would provide a strong correlation with K and H of the vertebral cancellous bone. Hence, µCT scans of human lumbar vertebra were used to determine a set of bone morphology descriptors. Subsequently, indentation tests on the bone samples were conducted to determine local values of K and H. Finally, a multivariate approach supported by principal component analysis was adopted to develop predictive statistical models of bone permeability and aggregate modulus as a function of bone morphology descriptors. It was found that linear combinations of bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, trabecular spacing, structure model index, connectivity density, and degree of anisotropy provide a strong correlation (R 2 ~ 76%) with K and a weaker correlation (R 2 ~ 47%) with H. The results of this study can be exploited in computational mechanics frameworks for investigating the potential mechanical behavior of human vertebra and to develop strategies to treat or prevent pathological conditions such as osteoporosis, age-related bone loss, and vertebral compression fractures. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

5.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 30(2): 135-140, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33426853

ABSTRACT

Study Design-Biomechanical cadaveric study. Objective-Long anterior cervical plate and cage (APC) constructs have a risk of pseudarthrosis with minor bone resorption. Stand-alone cages (SACs) allow settling. The biomechanics of SAC have been investigated, but not multilevel, compression screw SAC. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical safety of three-level SAC versus APC. Methods-Discectomies at three levels of five human cadaver spines (T1-C3) were fixed with SAC. A 0.18 mm thick shim was interposed between the cage and the superior endplate, and a pressure transducer map was placed between the cage and the inferior endplate. Tests were performed in flexion-extension and then repeated after removing the shims to simulate minor bone resorption. Subsequently, APC was applied and experiments were repeated. The pressure between each cage and endplate and motion of the implants were measured. Results-The range of motion (ROM) of SAC and APC constructs were comparable. The contact area and pressure between cage and endplate did not significantly change during motion with SAC. Shim removal did not significantly affect ROM, contact area, or average pressure measures. For APC, both contact area and pressure decreased from extension to flexion. Shim removal caused a significant loss of contact area and pressure. Conclusions-SAC provided comparable rigidity to the conventional APC construct while maintaining compression at the endplate-cage interface throughout flexion-extension and after minor bone resorption.


Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Screws , Cadaver , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...