Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary basal and dentoalveolar dimensions in patients with and without maxillary impacted canines.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to three-dimensionally evaluate the qualitative and quantitative maxillary basal, dentoalveolar, and dental dimensions in patients with unilateral or bilateral maxillary impacted canines relative to their normal peers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative study. Cone-beam computed tomography images of one hundred and fifty adult patients were divided into three equal groups: unilateral, bilateral, and control groups. Each had 50 patients that were three-dimensionally analysed. The quantitative measurements involved three basal (molar basal width, premolar basal width, and arch depth), seven dentoalveolar (molar alveolar width, premolar alveolar width, inter-molar width, inter-premolar width, inter-canine width, arch length, and arch perimeter), and two dental (canine length and width) measurements. The qualitative measurements included four bone density areas (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) around the maxillary impacted canines. RESULT: Differences between the three groups were statistically different for the quantitative measurements involving the two basal variables (molar basal width and premolar basal width) and all measured dentoalveolar variables; these were smaller in the unilateral and bilateral groups compared with the control group (p < 0.001). Unilateral and bilateral impacted canine groups showed significantly wider and shorter canines than the control group (p < 0.001). The qualitative measurements (the four bone density areas) around unilateral and bilateral impacted canine groups showed significantly greater density than the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant qualitative or quantitative difference between the unilateral and bilateral impacted canines. The three groups had no significant variations in terms of arch depth. CONCLUSION: Maxillary unilateral and bilateral canine impactions are associated with reduced basal and dentoalveolar dimensions as well as wider and shorter maxillary canines compared to normal peers. The quality of bone around unilateral and bilateral impacted maxillary canines is higher than in non-impacted cases. Unilateral and bilateral canine impactions have quite similar qualitative and quantitative parameters.

Three-dimensional radiographic assessment of bone changes around posterior dental implants at native bone site in Gansu Province, Northwest of China: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess bone density and thickness changed following dental implant placement in the maxillary and mandibular jaws. Also, observe the form of bone loss around the implant and the relationship between preoperative bone density and bone thickness with bone loss around dental implants. METHODS: 65 patients, including 102 dental implants, were assessed in this study. CBCT was utilized to determine the bone condition (bone thickness and density at three levels (sub-crestal bone at 3 mm (CB3), 6 mm (CB6), and 9 mm (CB9)) before implant placement, and 2 to 3 years after placement, also determine the bone loss pattern. RESULTS: The difference in bone thickness was 0.32 ± 0.50 mm at CB3, 0.18 ± 0.40 mm at CB6, and 0.14 ± 0.07 mm at CB9. The change buccal bone density at CB3, CB6, and CB9 were 344.5 ± 278.9, 260.5 ± 276, and 138.9 ± 313.9 HU, respectively, and the change in lingual bone density was 252.7 ± 247, 179.9 ± 244.1, and 281 ± 4063 HU, respectively. Only the CB3 level showed a significant decrease in bone thickness (p < 0.001), and a change in bone density was observed at the three levels (p < 0.001). The means of vertical and horizontal bone loss were 0.19 ± 0.23 mm and 0.18 ± 0.22 mm, respectively. Splinted or adjacent dental implants have more horizontal bone loss, with statistically significant (p < 0.001). Age, gender, and implant position were not statistically related to the outcome variables. There was a negative correlation between the preoperative status of the bone condition and pattern bone loss, as indicated by Pearson's correlation coefficient. CONCLUSION: CBCT detected a significant bone thickness decrease was found only at the crestal third. A significant bone density increase was found at three levels around dental implants. Implant areas with higher bone thickness and density had less bone loss.

Three-dimensional assessment of the favorability of maxillary posterior teeth intrusion in different skeletal classes limited by the vertical relationship with the maxillary sinus floor.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the anatomical relationship between the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) and the posterior maxillary teeth (PMT) is important when planning the orthodontic intrusion of the posterior teeth. This study aimed to determine the vertical relationship between posterior maxillary teeth and maxillary sinus floor in different skeletal classes in the Chinese adult population. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involved cone beam computed tomography images of 298 adult patients (145 males and 153 females) between 20 and 45 years old. The sample was categorized according to A point, Nasion, B point (ANB) angle into 102 Class I, 102 Class II, and 94 Class III malocclusion. Non-parametric Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the studied groups. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability analysis. RESULTS: Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean distance between both genders (P < 0.001). The measured distance increased with age in all posterior tooth roots (P < 0.001). The root apex in the sagittal view appeared to be closer to the maxillary sinus than in the coronal view; 2.2 ± 4.3 and 3.1 ± 5.5 mm, respectively. The most frequent root scores were Type 1 and Type 2P. In both sagittal and coronal views, Class I demonstrated a higher Type 2P prevalence, whereas Class III showed a lower prevalence. The second molars' mesiobuccal root had the largest number of penetration in the three examined skeletal classes. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary molars of Class I malocclusion with the majority of Type 2P root-sinus relationship have the highest possible risk of root resorption during molar intrusion due to cortical bone encroachment, while Class III malocclusion showed the least possible risk.

Three-dimensional assessment of the favorability of maxillary posterior teeth intrusion in different facial patterns limited by the vertical relationship with the maxillary sinus floor.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior teeth intrusion is one of the best treatment options for treatment of skeletal open bite in adults; the surrounding anatomical landmarks are one of the restraining factors. This study aimed to assess the vertical relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth (MPT) and the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) in different facial growth patterns in the Chinese adult population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography images of 298 patients, 145 males and 153 females aged between 20 and 45 years, were analyzed. Based on Jarabak ratio and the mandibular plane inclination, the sample was categorized into 94 hyperdivergent, 102 hypodivergent, and 102 normodivergent facial patterns subjects. The vertical relationship between the root-apex distances were classified as favorable, indicating no contact (type 1), or unfavorable, indicating roots in contact (type 2) for the posterior teeth intrusion. The relationship in the unfavorable group was subdivided into three subgroups (T2C, T2LC, and T2P). Comparative statistical tests were done related to age, gender, tooth side, and type of multiplanar view (sagittal and coronal). The significant level was set to be P < 0.05. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean distance between both genders in the hyperdivergent group (P < 0.001). The measured distance increased with age in all tooth roots (P < 0.001). In both sagittal and coronal views, the most frequent root scores were type 1 and type 2p (54.2%, 27.5%) and (55.1%, 21.4%), respectively. The hyperdivergent group demonstrated a higher prevalence of type 2P (31.6% and 25.5%), whereas the hypodivergent group showed a lower prevalence (25.1% and 19.2%); furthermore, the second molar's mesiobuccal root in hyperdivergent patients showed the closest distance to the maxillary sinus in sagittal and coronal views, 0.3 ± 3.7 and 0.4 ± 3.1 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary molars of hyperdivergent patients have the highest possible risk of root resorption due to the possible risk of cortical bone encroachment, while hypodivergent patients have the least possible risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Analysis of apex-sinus distances can be of great help for safe posterior teeth intrusion and providing correct and adequate treatment.