ABSTRACT
Surgical resection of an oral tumour (and the associated free flap reconstruction) can significantly alter the oral anatomy. The lack of sulcus depth, alveolar ridge, presence of a mobile flap and limited tongue movement can make it impossible for patients to control a removable prosthesis. To help this cohort of patients, dental implants can be invaluable. The Oral Rehabilitation Team at Central Manchester University Dental Hospital have used dental implants to rehabilitate oral cancer patients for over thirty years. After their resective surgery, a number of patients were dentally rehabilitated with a laboratory-made, precious metal-alloy bar supported by at least four dental implants. A metal-alloy under-sleeve retained overdenture was then provided to fit over the milled bar. The majority of the 50 patients in this case series had tumours in the anterior floor of the mouth. It was noted that 76% of the patients received a rim resection and were reconstructed with a fasciocutaneous, soft tissue free flap. Six percent of patients received a segmental resection and were reconstructed with either a fibular or deep circumflex iliac artery free flap. The dental implants and sleeve overdentures had a survival rate of 100%. None of the dentures lost retention, implying that the frictional grip between the overcasting and the milled bar was sufficient to appease the retention demands of this cohort. However, 10% of patients encountered complications. This would suggest a success (or complication free) rate of 90% for this cohort of 50 oncology patients. This would still imply that milled bars/sleeve overdentures carry a relatively low maintenance burden and may be a useful treatment option for oral cancer patients.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Denture, Overlay , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Prosthesis , Dental Prosthesis Design , Denture Retention , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/rehabilitationABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to report on the 7-year follow-up of 15 patients who took part in a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth trial to evaluate the performance and patient satisfaction of 107 direct composite restorations bonded to their worn anterior mandibular dentition. This is the continuation of a study by Poyser et al., which investigated the performance of the same direct composite restorations on this cohort of patients at 2.5 years. The results of the present study suggest that direct composite restorations bonded to the worn anterior mandibular dentition to have an approximate survival of 85% at the 7-year follow-up. Approximately 53% of patients experienced survival of all of their restorations. Pre-operative circumferential preparation did not influence restoration survival, patient satisfaction or other clinical variables (restoration staining, marginal discolouration, shade match, surface roughness and marginal adaptation). The time taken to initially build-up the restorations was shown to be statistically significant with a longer procedural time meaning less chance of the restoration being present at 7 years. This treatment modality exhibited no biological complications for the teeth, supporting periodontium or TMJ apparatus. The placement of these restorations provided an improvement in the aesthetics of the teeth, a reduction in the concern over the longevity of the worn lower anterior teeth, and improvements with regard to sensitivity experienced with hot or cold foods or drinks. Marginal breakdown was the most frequently recorded clinical complication. Thus, for the majority of patients, the restorations offered a high degree of patient satisfaction and required an acceptable level of maintenance in the 7-year follow-up period.
Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Tooth Wear/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Color , Cuspid/pathology , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Pulp Test , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Restoration Wear , Dentin Sensitivity/prevention & control , Esthetics, Dental , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incisor/pathology , Mandible , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Periodontal Index , Prospective Studies , Surface Properties , Survival Analysis , Tooth Preparation/classificationABSTRACT
The replantation of avulsed primary incisors is contra-indicated. This case describes an 8-year-old child who six years previously had avulsed and had replanted a primary central incisor. At presentation, this tooth was retained, the permanent successor had failed to erupt and appearance of the adjacent lateral incisor was notably delayed. Investigation revealed a radicular cyst in relation to the replanted deciduous incisor together with severe displacement of the permanent tooth, which could not be saved.
