Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Rheumatol Rep ; 23(8): 64, 2021 07 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34216291

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the clinical and genetic findings in four patients from a single family who presented with refractory psoriatic arthritis and were hemizygous in the forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3) gene (c.1222G>A). RECENT FINDINGS: We report four siblings with hemizygous mutation in the FOXP3 gene (c.1222G>A) who presented with type 1 diabetes mellitus and psoriatic arthritis poorly responsive to treatment. Our findings expand the phenotype spectrum of FOXP3 mutations. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, and enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome is a rare disorder caused by mutations in FOXP3 gene, which lead to early onset of constellation of autoimmune manifestations. This report highlights the influence of immune dysregulation in juvenile arthritis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile , Genetic Diseases, X-Linked , Arthritis, Juvenile/genetics , Cluster Analysis , Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics , Genetic Diseases, X-Linked/genetics , Humans , Mutation , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory
2.
Genet Med ; 17(9): 719-25, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25503496

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Molecular karyotyping has rapidly become the test of choice in patients with neurocognitive phenotypes, but studies of its clinical utility have largely been limited to outbred populations. In consanguineous populations, single-gene recessive causes of neurocognitive phenotypes are expected to account for a relatively high percentage of cases, thus diminishing the yield of molecular karyotyping. The aim of this study was to test the clinical yield of molecular karyotyping in the highly consanguineous population of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We have reviewed the data of 584 patients with neurocognitive phenotypes (mainly referred from pediatric neurology clinics), all evaluated by a single clinical geneticist. RESULTS: At least 21% of tested cases had chromosomal aberrations that are likely disease-causing. These changes include both known and novel deletion syndromes. The higher yield of molecular karyotyping in this study as compared with the commonly cited 11% can be explained by our ability to efficiently identify single-gene disorders, thus enriching the samples that underwent molecular karyotyping for de novo chromosomal aberrations. We show that we were able to identify a causal mutation in 37% of cases on a clinical basis with the help of autozygome analysis, thus bypassing the need for molecular karyotyping. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the clinical utility of molecular karyotyping even in highly consanguineous populations.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Disorders/genetics , Consanguinity , Neurocognitive Disorders/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Chromosome Disorders/epidemiology , DNA Copy Number Variations , Developmental Disabilities , Female , Genetic Association Studies , Humans , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Karyotyping/methods , Male , Neurocognitive Disorders/diagnosis , Neurocognitive Disorders/epidemiology , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Retrospective Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...