ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-Cov-2. Four major vaccine types are being used to fight against this deadly pandemic and save precious human lives. All types of vaccines have been associated with a risk of neurological complications ranging from mild to severe. Cervical dystonia occurring after a COVID-19 vaccine was not previously reported in the literature. In this article, we describe a case of acute cervical dystonia occurring after the first dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. We attribute the occurrence of cervical dystonia to the vaccine due to the temporal relationship. This report adds to the literature a possible rare side effect of a COVID-19 vaccine and contributes to the limited literature on potential neurological side effects of mRNA-based vaccines. The likely mechanism is autoimmune. Further research is needed to probe and study the exact mechanism.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Torticollis , Viral Vaccines , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Torticollis/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare infection of the central nervous system due to the reactivation of the John Cunningham polyomavirus. It is commonly a progressive fatal disease with worldwide distribution. CASE REPORT: We describe a rare case of PML, which was misdiagnosed as neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with a catastrophic outcome due to delay in diagnosis with superadded cyclophosphamide therapy. CONCLUSION: There are several lessons taught from our case. Firstly, in patients with autoimmune disorders who are strongly immunosuppressed, the new onset of cognitive impairment and seizures should alert the treating physician to look carefully for PML. Secondly, in cases of SLE where the diagnosis of the cause of cognitive impairment and seizures is not clear, we suggest that immunosuppression should not be intensified until PML has clearly been ruled out. Lastly, multidisciplinary care in patients with suspected neuropsychiatric SLE including a neurologist, an infectious diseases consultant, a neuroradiologist, and a rheumatologist is needed.
Subject(s)
Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Lupus Vasculitis, Central Nervous System , Diagnostic Errors/adverse effects , Humans , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/diagnosis , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/etiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Vasculitis, Central Nervous System/complications , Lupus Vasculitis, Central Nervous System/diagnosis , Seizures/complicationsABSTRACT
Unexplained flank pain should alert physicians regarding the possibility of acute renal infarction. Despite its rare occurrence, prompt diagnosis and management of renal infarction can improve outcomes. We report a previously healthy 37-year-old male who presented to the emergency department complaining of left flank pain. Computed tomography angiogram showed a thrombus in the left renal artery. The patient responded well to treatment with anticoagulation, and the symptoms resolved. The present case conforms with other experiences of good outcomes when treatment is initiated in a timely manner. Anticoagulation led to resolution of the thrombus and restoration of perfusion. This case report should remind physicians to consider renal infarction in the differential diagnosis of an acute abdomen patient with no risk factors.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of screening for sepsis using an electronic sepsis alert vs. no alert in hospitalized ward patients on 90-day in-hospital mortality. METHODS: The SCREEN trial is designed as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Hospital wards (total of 45 wards, constituting clusters in this design) are randomized to have active alert vs. masked alert, 5 wards at a time, with each 5 wards constituting a sequence. The study consists of ten 2-month periods with a phased introduction of the intervention. In the first period, all wards have a masked alert for 2 months. Afterwards the intervention (alert system) is implemented in a new sequence every 2-month period until the intervention is implemented in all sequences. The intervention includes the implementation of an electronic alert system developed in the hospital electronic medical records based on the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA). The alert system sends notifications of "possible sepsis alert" to the bedside nurse, charge nurse, and primary medical team and requires an acknowledgment in the health information system from the bedside nurse and physician. The calculated sample size is 65,250. The primary endpoint is in-hospital mortality by 90 days. DISCUSSION: The trial started on October 1, 2019, and is expected to complete patient follow-up by the end of October 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04078594 . Registered on September 6, 2019.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Sepsis , Electronics , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Patients , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/therapyABSTRACT
Amitriptyline is one of the leading medications used for migraine as prophylaxis. Amitriptyline may cause various side effects ranging from mild symptoms such as constipation and dry mouth to severe adverse events such as seizures and coma. Here we present a case of a young gentleman who was started on amitriptyline for migraine but developed hypertension. The patient's blood pressure normalized after stopping amitriptyline but became elevated when reintroduced. The case highlights the possibility of amitriptyline-induced hypertension even without concomitant medication use or high doses. We recommend regular blood pressure monitoring for patients on amitriptyline regardless of the dose.
ABSTRACT
Background The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the globe dramatically. It has affected daily life noticeably and the teaching process is one of the significantly affected aspects as the learning approach has been shifted to distance learning (DL). These new changes may affect student performance and emotional well-being. This study aimed to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and distance learning on healthcare students. Method An online self-administered cross-sectional survey was distributed to healthcare students for the period between April 2020 to June 2020. The study included students from different universities in Saudi Arabia. Knowledge and perception of COVID-19 and the experience of distance learning during the pandemic period were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Psychological effect was evaluated using Four-Item Patient Health Questionnaire for Anxiety and Depression (PHQ-4). Results A total of 721 students completed the survey with the majority being females. Around 25% of students had experienced anxiety, while 35% had depression. Severe anxiety and depression were noted in over 6% of the participants. Younger age and female gender were more affected psychologically. Students with higher scores in PHQ-4 were strongly disagreeing that hand gloves and surgical masks may help in preventing COVID-19 transmission. Students with normal psychological assessment were more likely to favor DL, while students with moderate to severe anxiety and depression disagreed. Conclusion Healthcare students have alarmingly high levels of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. General knowledge of the pandemic is not associated with the psychological impact. DL is a convenient approach for students with normal PHQ-4 scores. Programs to help students overcome the psychological impact of COVID-19 are highly recommended.