"Veins first" versus "artery first" approach for management of mixed arterial venous leg ulcers (MAVLU): Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Mixed Arterial and Venous Leg Ulcers (MAVLU) are challenging. The optimal intervention sequence (artery-first vs vein first) is unclear. This review evaluates current evidence on surgical intervention sequencing. METHODS: MEDLINE, PUBMED, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched using the term 'mixed arterial venous leg ulcers.' Studies were eligible if they reported ulcer healing outcomes in MAVLU patients. Pooled proportions were calculated by random effects modelling. RESULTS: The search yielded 606 studies, eight of which contained sufficient data to include in the analysis. There were no randomized controlled trials. Initial modified compression (MCT) and rescue revascularisation in MAVLU with ABI 0.5 to 0.85 achieved a pooled healing rate of 75% (95% CI 69% to 80%) compared to 79% (95% CI 61% to 93%) in patients with standard VLUs. The pooled rescue revascularisation rate for MAVLU patients with moderate arterial disease was 25% (95% CI 6% to 51%). Patients with severe arterial disease (ABI <0.5) who underwent arterial intervention first were less likely to heal (pooled proportion 40%; 95% confidence interval 16% to 66%). No studies compared either MCT or venous ablation with arterial revascularisation as first-line in patients with moderate arterial disease (ABI 0.5 to 0.85) alone or severe arterial disease (ABI <0.5) alone. There was marked heterogeneity between studies with respect to ulcer healing outcomes reported, definitions of ulcer healing, duration and size of ulcers at presentation, use of adjunct procedures such as skin grafting, unit of measurement (legs vs patients) and duration of follow up. CONCLUSION: A 'veins first' approach to MAVLU is plausible but robust data are lacking and should be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

Review of Mixed Arterial Venous Leg Ulcers (MAVLU) Disease in Contemporary Practice.

BACKGROUND: Mixed Arterial and Venous Leg Ulcers (MAVLU) are challenging. Clinical evidence specific to MAVLU management is scarce. We evaluated our recent experience with MAVLU patients and reviewed current data regarding MAVLU epidemiology, aetiology, diagnostic assessment and management options. METHODS: A prospective leg ulcer database was retrospectively interrogated to determine the prevalence and clinical outcome of MAVLU over 2-year period (2021-2022). The literature was reviewed to determine if optimal treatment strategies. RESULTS: 307 patients attended the ulcer clinic over a 2-year period. Most were venous leg ulcers (71%), 24% were arterial and 5% were MAVLU. The highest healing rate was in MAVLU (93%), followed by (74%) and (41%), in arterial and venous leg ulcer groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based guidelines for MAVLU remain lacking. Well-developed randomised controlled trials are warranted to guide current clinical practice.

Left-sided appendicitis in intestinal malrotation: a minimally invasive approach.

Intestinal malrotation is a rare clinical entity that occurs in 1/6000 live births. Acute appendicitis (AA) is commonly recognized clinically by migratory right iliac fossa pain. We present a rare case of AA in a patient with previously undiagnosed IM that posed a diagnostic challenge due to abnormal caecal location, which was managed by a laparoscopic approach. The presence of undiagnosed congenital anomalies such as IM can render diagnosis of even seemingly straightforward conditions such as AA challenging, meaning that the presence of classical clinical findings cannot always be relied upon. One should have a low threshold for performing cross-sectional imaging in cases where clinical findings do not yield a satisfactory diagnosis. The adult patient with AA in the context of incidental type 1 IM can be managed laparoscopically by a simple modification of standard technique, without the need to correct malrotation, thus allowing the patient to benefit minimally invasive surgery.

Pre and retroperitoneal necrotizing fasciitis after COVID-19 infection: A case report.

Necrotizing fasciitis is a serious infection that originates in the subcutaneous tissues. We present a case of 52 years old male patient who developed preperitoneal and retroperitoneal necrotizing fasciitis 2 weeks after the start of Coronavirus-19 infection. Preoperative abdominal computed tomography with intravenous and oral contrast revealed pre and retroperitoneal spread of air loculi with turbid fluid patches within necrotic tissues. After surgical excision of the lesion, histopathological and microbiological examinations of the samples revealed necrotizing fasciitis. This is the first report of preperitoneal and retroperitoneal necrotizing fasciitis after Coronavirus-19 infection in 52 years old male with no history of trauma or immunocompromised condition. Coronavirus-19 infection may increase the liability of patients to develop overwhelming infection and it may also delay the patient presentation causing serious health-related emergencies. The findings of necrotizing fasciitis on clinical grounds or imaging studies can help in diagnosis as well as the surgical intervention and appropriate antibiotics can highly impact the prognosis and survival of the patient.

Diagnostic Performance of Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index in Lower Extremity Arterial Disease.

Introduction Ankle-brachial pressure indices (ABIs) continue to form the basis of diagnostics for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). However, there remains a paucity of data to support its accuracy. This study aims to evaluate its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity using established arterial-imaging modalities as a benchmark. Methods In this retrospective study, a regional, prospectively maintained, vascular laboratory database was interrogated to identify referred patients with arterial disease who underwent concomitant assessment with ABI and lower limb arterial duplex ultrasound (DUS). Duplex acted as the reference standard. Those who had peripheral computed tomography angiogram (CTA) within 3 months of initial assessment were included in a subgroup analysis to correlate ABI with CTA. The primary end point was the sensitivity and specificity of ABI compared with DUS as the reference standard. Results Concomitant assessment was performed in 438 limbs (250 patients) over a 27-month period. The ABI was normal (0.9 to 1.4) in 196 limbs (44.9%) and abnormal in the remaining 241 limbs (55.1%). False-positive results occurred in 83 out of 241 limbs (34.4%), and false-negative results occurred in 54 limbs out of 196 (27.5%). True-positive results were 158 out of 241 limbs (65.6%), whereas true-negative results were 142 out of 196 limbs (72.4%). ABI using DUS as a benchmark identified a sensitivity for peripheral artery disease of 72.3% and a specificity of 69.3%. Concomitant CTA imaging was available in 200 limbs. The sensitivity and specificity of ABI correlated with CTA were 65.5 and 68.8%, respectively. Conclusion ABIs have a moderate predictive value in the diagnosis of LEAD. Normal range outcomes cannot be taken to infer the absence of LEAD and, as such, further arterial imaging in the form of DUS or angiography should be strongly considered in those with suspected underlying disease requiring intervention. Further noninvasive tests such as exercise studies or pulse volume waveforms should be considered, if diagnostic uncertainty exists, in those requiring nonoperative intervention and risk factor control.

A rare anatomical variation of great saphenous vein at the level of saphenofemoral junction.

The saphenofemoral junction is one of the major connections between the superficial and deep venous system in the leg. It is important to understand the anatomic variations in the lower extremity for treatment of venous disorders. There are many variations of the superficial system, most of them are with the great saphenous vein. A rare anatomic variant where the great saphenous vein is located between the superficial femoral and profunda arteries at the level of saphenofemoral junction is discussed in our case report.