ABSTRACT
Introduction Air pollution is a critical public health issue associated with various respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. The lungs and heart are the organs most affected by air pollution, and damage to these organs is strongly associated with inhaled particulate matter produced by burning fossil fuels. Household and ambient air pollution have been closely linked to lower respiratory infections, with ambient air pollution alone estimated to be responsible for millions of deaths globally each year. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the general public knowledge attitude and practice regarding air pollution and cardiopulmonary morbidity in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods The study was conducted in Saudi Arabia using a self-administered questionnaire distributed through popular social media apps. A snowball sampling technique was used, including only Saudi citizens aged 18 or older. The questionnaire consisted of 30 questions derived from a comprehensive literature review on the subject matter. Questions were validated through face validity, pilot testing, and Cronbach's alpha reliability measurement. The questionnaire included questions on demographic data, knowledge of air pollution, the relationship between air pollution and cardiopulmonary diseases, and attitudes and practices toward lowering exposure to air pollution. Results The study included 649 participants, with a mean age of 32.11 ± 13.47 years, and over half were females (54.7%). Most participants were aware of outdoor and indoor air pollution, but only a tiny percentage recognized cooking as a primary indoor source of pollution. However, the majority believed that indoor pollution could contribute to outdoor pollution. Participants associated air pollution with cardiopulmonary diseases, mainly secondhand tobacco smoke and outdoor air pollution caused by factories and industrial facilities. Knowledge and practice levels varied, with older individuals, females, and those in non-health-related occupations having higher levels of knowledge. Positive attitudes, particularly believing that moving to a less polluted area improves health, were associated with better knowledge. Females exhibited better air pollution-related practices, and there was a positive correlation between knowledge and practice scores. Conclusion The study highlighted the need for targeted public health campaigns to improve awareness and promote healthier practices, particularly among young adults, to mitigate the potential health impacts of air pollution, especially cardiopulmonary health.
ABSTRACT
Background: A supportive educational climate in which learners are educated and monitored is a significant determinant of the medical trainees' performance and progress and eventually contributes to better patient care. Therefore, residents' training programs need to be assessed and incorporated according to the views and expectations of the candidates. The objectives of this research are to compare and evaluate the learning environment of Family Medicine (FM) programs in Jeddah and make practical recommendations for improvement of the learning environment. Methods: A descriptive causal-comparative study was designed at FM programs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia during January, and February 2021, including all residents from R1 to R4. A Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) questionnaire was used in this study. The overall score and the three domains were calculated. Results: Two hundred and eighty-three questionnaires were distributed, and 262 were completed and collected, making a response rate of 92.6%. Females represented were 150 (57.3%), and males were 112 (42.7%). The study shows that 78 (29.8%) of the residents reported that the learning environment was excellent, and 154 (58.8%) described it as a more positive than the negative environment, whereas 29 (11.1%) described it as having a lot of problems. Out of 160 maximum scores, the highest total score (127) was observed among residents at the National Guard program, whereas the lowest score (108) was in the FM joint program, P < 0.001. Conclusion: Evaluation of the training programs is an essential component of quality assurance procedures. The satisfaction of the FM residents at different programs in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, is better than reported previously, but however, further improvement is warranted. Juniors and residents of the National Guard program were more satisfied than their peers. We recommend low score items should have special consideration from high authorities and ongoing evaluation of the FM training program for further improvement of the learning environment.
ABSTRACT
Any organ system is prone to extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) development, including the spine. Spinal TB is a rare involvement, although considered one of the most dangerous forms of skeletal TB (STB). A 31-year-old man, who is a healthcare worker, presented to the outpatient Orthopedic Spine clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (KAMC-MNGHA) Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, with a complaint of axial neck and upper back pain whose condition deteriorated quickly, necessitating urgent admission for surgical treatment in the form of cervical spine decompression and fusion, in addition to the anti-tuberculosis drug (ATD) scheme. Cervical TB is a rare spinal disease that supposedly has a slow, insidious progression. The main presenting symptoms of which are axial and/or radicular pain, with a possible neurological deficit(s). In this particular case, the rapid progression of the disease necessitated rapid action. In spite of what is known about spine TB and its slow progression, the case presented here was beyond our expectations. Treatment planning and urgency should not rely on the known natural history of the disease but rather be tailored to each case individually. This delineates the importance of reporting the quick, unexpected deterioration of our patient's condition.
