Irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer: a new survival standard.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that prolongs survival in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). This demonstrated activity of irinotecan as effective second-line therapy for colorectal cancer led to evaluation of combination irinotecan/5-FU/LV as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic disease. The results of two prospective phase III randomized, controlled, multicenter, multinational clinical trials in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer served as the basis for U.S. and European approval of irinotecan/5-FU/LV for this indication. An overview of the findings of these two pivotal studies provides insights regarding the application of this new combination in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5-FU/LV, either alone, or with concurrent irinotecan. The study conducted primarily in North America (study 1), employed bolus 5-FU/LV schedules, while the study performed primarily in Europe (study 2), employed infusional 5-FU/LV regimens. Major endpoints included tumor response rate, time to tumor progression (TTP), overall survival, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: In study 1, the respective confirmed response rates for irinotecan/5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV were 39% and 21% (p <.001); median TTPs were 7.0 months and 4.3 months, respectively (p =.004). In study 2, response rates for irinotecan/5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV alone were 35% and 22% (p =.005); median TTPs were 6.7 months and 4.4 months, respectively (p <.001). Survival time increased significantly with irinotecan/5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV alone in both studies (study 1: median 14.8 months versus 12.6 months, p =.042; study 2: median 17.4 months versus 14.1 months, p =.032). The combined analysis of the data from the two studies showed median survivals of 15.9 months versus 13.3 months, favoring the irinotecan-containing combinations (stratified-by-study p =.003). Patients in study 1 had a 36% lower risk of tumor progression and a 20% lower risk of death with the irinotecan combination than with 5-FU/LV alone; comparable risk reduction values in study 2 were 42% and 23%. While grade 3 diarrhea and vomiting were more common with irinotecan/5-FU/LV, grade 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and mucositis were less common with irinotecan/5-FU/LV than with the Mayo Clinic 5-FU/LV regimen. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan/5-FU/LV is superior to 5-FU/LV alone as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, offering consistently improved tumor control and prolonged survival. Irinotecan-based combination therapy sets a new survival standard for the treatment of this life-threatening disease.

Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan is active against colorectal cancer in patients whose disease is refractory to fluorouracil. We investigated the efficacy of these two agents combined for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: 387 patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (other than adjuvant) for advanced colorectal cancer were randomly assigned open-label irinotecan plus fluorouracil and calcium folinate (irinotecan group, n=199) or fluorouracil and calcium folinate alone (no-irinotecan group, n=188). Infusion schedules were once weekly or every 2 weeks, and were chosen by each centre. We assessed response rates and time to progression, and also response duration, survival, and quality of life. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population and on evaluable patients. FINDINGS: The response rate was significantly higher in patients in the irinotecan group than in those in the no-irinotecan group (49 vs 31%, p<0.001 for evaluable patients, 35 vs 22%, p<0.005 by intention to treat). Time to progression was significantly longer in the irinotecan group than in the no-irinotecan group (median 6.7 vs 4.4 months, p<0.001), and overall survival was higher (median 17.4 vs 14.1 months, p=0.031). Some grade 3 and 4 toxic effects were significantly more frequent in the irinotecan group than in the no-irinotecan group, but effects were predictible, reversible, non-cumulative, and manageable. INTERPRETATION: Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil and calcium folinate was well-tolerated and increased response rate, time to progression, and survival, with a later deterioration in quality of life. This combination should be considered as a reference first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P =.008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinblastine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n=203) or mitomycin 12 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks (n=189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantly higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P < .0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer with docetaxel than MV (19 v 1 weeks, P=.001, and 1 1.4 v 8.7 months, P=.0097, respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93.1 % v62.5%; P < .05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV (12.0% v 4.1%; P < .05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse events (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a number of factors, but results were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients with MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

Phase I and pharmacology study of intoplicine (RP 60475; NSC 645008), novel topoisomerase I and II inhibitor, in cancer patients.

Intoplicine (RP 60475F; NSC 645008) is a novel 7H-benzo[e]pyrido[4,3-b]indole derivative which interacts with both topoisomerases I and II. Because of its high activity in preclinical cancer models, original mechanism of action and acceptable toxicity profile, intoplicine was further evaluated in a phase I and pharmacology study. Thirty-three (33) patients (24 men and nine women) meeting standard phase I eligibility criteria were included: median age was 56 years, performance status 0-1 in 28 patients and 2 in five patients. Tumor primary sites were head and neck (9), colon (6), lung (3) and various other sites (15). Thirty-one patients had received prior radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Sixty-nine coursed of intoplicine were administered as a 1 h i.v. infusion at dose levels ranging from 12 to 360 mg/m2. Dose-dependent and reproducible hepatotoxicity was dose limiting in three out of four patients at 360 mg/m2: this toxicity was reversible in two of three patients, but fatal in one. Two sudden deaths occurred in this study at 12 and 48 mg/m2, and the drug implication could not be excluded. No myelosuppression was noted. Hepatotoxicity is therefore dose limiting at 360 mg/m2, and the phase II recommended dose is 270 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with close monitoring of hepatic and cardiac functions. Intoplicine pharmacokinetics was determined in plasma (23 patients) and whole blood (18 patients) at doses ranging from 12 to 360 mg/m2. Intoplicine plasma concentration decay was either bi- or triphasic with the following pharmacokinetic values (mean +/- SEM): half-life alpha, 0.04 +/- 0.004 h; half-life beta, 0.61 +/- 0.13 h; terminal half-life, 19.4 +/- 4.0 h; mean residence-time (MRT), 11.3 +/- 2.4; total plasma clearance (CL), 74 +/- 5 l/h; volume of distribution beta (V beta), 1982 +/- 477 l: volume of distribution at steady state (Vss): 802 +/- 188 l. both the area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) increased linearly with the intoplicine dose, indicating linear pharmacokinetics (AUC: r = 0.937; slope = 0.01305; p < 0.001; Cmax: r = 0.847; slop = 0.01115; p < 0.001). Plasma AUC was also predicted very accurately by the Cmax values (r = 0.909; slope = 1.0701; p < 0.001). Other plasma pharmacokinetic parameter values increased significantly with dose, e.g. the terminal half-life (r = 0.748, p < 0.001) the MRT (r = 0.728, p < 0.001), the V beta (r = 0.809, p < 0.001), and the Vss (r = 0.804, p < 0.001). This was probably due to a longer detectability of the drug in plasma at higher doses. Blood pharmacokinetics was also evaluated in 18 patients since it was found that red blood cells represented a significant drug reservoir for intoplicine. Blood intoplicine disposition curves were either bi- or triphasic with the following pharmacokinetic parameter values (mean +/- SEM): half-life alpha, 0.04 +/- 0.01 h; half-life beta, 0.94 +/- 0.22 h; terminal half-life, 57.1 +/- 6.6 h; MRT, 82.2 +/- 9.9 h; CL, 18 +/- 3 l/h; V beta, 1188 +/- 147 I; Vss 1163 +/- 138 I. Blood pharmacokinetics was linear, since AUC and Cmax increased linearly with dose (AUC: r = 0.879; slop = 0.06884; p < 0.001; Cmax: r = 0.835, slop = 0.01223; p < 0.001). Blood AUC values could also be determined by the blood Cmax (r = 0.768; slop = 5.0206; p < 0.001). Other blood pharmacokinetic parameter values presented a dose dependence, e.g. the terminal half-life (r = 0.626, p = 0.005), the V beta (r = 0.682, p = 0.002) and the Vss (r = 0.555, p = 0.017). The plasma or blood intoplicine concentrations achieved in vivo in humans are potentially cytotoxic levels based on preclinical in vivo and in vitro data. In conclusion, the phase II recommended dose of intoplicine is 270 mg/m2 administered as a 1 h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Plasma and blood pharmacokinetics were linear within the dose range studied. Potentially cytotoxic concentrations were reached at clinically achievable doses.

Phase I study of RP 49532A, a new protein-synthesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.

Giroline (RP 49532A) is a new protein-synthesis inhibitor with broad antitumor activity in experimental models. In the present phase I study, Giroline was given by 24-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 3 to 15 mg/m2 to 12 patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. The dose-limiting toxic effects were delayed hypotension and severe asthenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 15 mg/m2. Transient nausea and vomiting during infusion were reported at all dose levels. Mild reversible prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time was observed in most patients at dose levels above 3 mg/m2. No antitumor activity was observed. The toxicity profile of Giroline precludes further evaluation in cancer patients.

A phase II trial with docetaxel (Taxotere) in second line treatment with chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A study of the EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel, a semisynthetic analog of paclitaxel, made for the needles of the European yew, Taxus baccata, is a potentially important chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase II study patients with advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer and bidimensionally measurable disease, were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks as a 1 hour infusion without any premedication. Treatment was evaluated after 2 courses and every 2 subsequent courses. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were entered, 32 were eligible. The eligible patients had a median age of 51 years (range 30-73) and a performance status WHO 1 median, (range 0-2). Twenty-eight patients had been treated with surgery, 24 with radiation. Hormonal treatment was previously given in 23, chemotherapy in 32. Of 24 patients treated as second line strategy, 13 achieved a partial remission, 1 a complete remission (overall response rate 58% (95% CI 37%-78%)). Eight patients treated as first line: 2 PR's, 1 CR. The median overall response duration was 38 weeks. The main toxicity consisted of transient grade 4 neutropenia in 149 of 167 evaluable courses (89%). However, the related infection rate was low. Re-treatment at 3 weeks, as scheduled, was nearly always possible. Other toxicities consisted of skin reactions (81%) and nail changes (41%), neurosensory toxicity (59%) and occasionally hypersensitivity reactions (16%). Fluid retention was a toxicity of major concern, observed in 59% of patients. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is a very active drug against breast cancer. Further studies are required to alleviate the non-hematological toxicities.

Activity of intoplicine (RP60475), a new DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitor, against human tumor colony-forming units in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Intoplicine (RP60475) is the most active analogue evaluated in the 7H-benzo[e]-pyrido-[4,3-b]-indole series of antineoplastic compounds. It exerts its activity through inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I and II. PURPOSE: This study was planned to determine plasma concentrations of intoplicine necessary for optimal clinical antitumor activity, as well as to pinpoint possible responsive tumor types that can be included in phase II clinical studies. METHODS: Tumor specimens were collected from patients as part of routine clinical measures. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from freshly obtained solid tumor biopsy specimens and were exposed to intoplicine either for 1 hour or continuously. The sensitivity of these specimens to intoplicine was evaluated in a human tumor soft-agar cloning assay. Response was considered positive when the colony-forming unit count in drug-treated samples was 50% or less than the response of control tumor samples treated with saline. RESULTS: With 1-hour exposure to intoplicine at final concentrations of 2.5 micrograms/mL and 10.0 micrograms/mL, 26% and 54% of the assessable specimens showed positive in vitro responses, respectively. With continuous exposure to intoplicine at concentrations of 0.25 micrograms/mL and 2.5 micrograms/mL, 16% and 71% of the assessable specimens showed positive responses, respectively. Activity was seen against breast (71%), non-small-cell lung (69%), and ovarian (45%) cancer colony-forming units at a intoplicine concentration of 10.0 micrograms/mL after 1-hour exposure. Incomplete cross-resistance with doxorubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, vinblastine, and etoposide was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intoplicine appears to be active in vitro against a variety of human tumors, including a subgroup of tumors insensitive in vitro to standard antineoplastic compounds. If plasma levels of 10.0 micrograms/mL can be achieved in subjects in ongoing clinical trials, intoplicine could have significant clinical activity. IMPLICATIONS: These data indicate that further investigation of intoplicine is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 4'-iodo-4'-deoxy-doxorubicin in humans.

PURPOSE: 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin is a new anthracycline that currently is under clinical evaluation. To improve the management of future trials, we have determined its pharmacokinetics and metabolism during a phase I/II study and have tried to relate the parameters obtained to the hematologic toxicity of the drug in terms of the survival of blood cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pharmacologic study included 19 patients who were entered at dose levels that ranged between 6 and 90 mg/m2; nine patients were treated at 80 mg/m2, which is close to the maximum recommended dose level. Blood sampling was performed from the end of the bolus infusion to 48 hours after treatment. Drug and metabolites were extracted and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the data were processed by nonlinear fitting to multicompartment models. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations were best fitted to a three-compartment model with half-lives of 5.2 minutes, 0.79 hours, and 10.3 hours. The total body clearance and volume of distribution at steady state were high (350 L/h/m2 and 2,065 L/m2). The drug was metabolized extensively to a 13-dihydroderivative, 4'-iodo-4'-deoxy-doxorubicinol; the mean area under the curve (AUC) ratio metabolite/parent drug was the highest observed ever for an anthracycline (12.1 +/- 7.4); the metabolite was cleared from the plasma with an elimination half-life of 15.3 hours. The AUCs of the parent compound and its metabolite were related linearly to the dose administered, and showed no saturation phenomenon. Urinary excretion was studied in nine patients and showed a cumulative elimination of less than 6% of the dose administered, two thirds of which were eliminated in the first 12 hours after injection. Ninety-three percent to 100% of the elimination of fluorescent compounds occurred in the form of the metabolite. Drug concentration in five tumor samples showed a rapid uptake of the drug from plasma and a preferential uptake of the parent drug compared with the metabolite. Blood cell counts after 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin treatment showed significant correlations among the surviving fractions of both granulocytes and platelets and the AUCs of the parent drug and its metabolite; the most significant correlations were obtained for the granulocytes and the metabolite. Significant correlations between AUCs and blood-cell survivals were maintained, even if only the nine patients treated at the dose of 80 mg/m2 were taken into account for the computation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results especially show that myelosuppression that is induced by 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin can be well predicted by the measure of the AUC of the drug and its metabolite. This could be used for the further development of the drug toward high-dosage schedules.

Specificity of the phase I trial for cytotoxic drugs in oncology.

The phase I trial in oncology follows a very different methodology than in other areas of medicine. Its main objective is the identification of the maximal tolerated dose with short and middle range toxicity limits. In general the therapeutic index of anticancer drugs is narrow and the efficacy of drugs is closely associated with their toxic range: specially hematologic. This toxicity has to be well defined within its nature, its gravity, its dose relationship and its reversibility. It is usually correlated with pharmacokinetic. The cytotoxic agents have as their main target DNA and therefore the long term toxicity is poorly defined and seldom wellknown. The oncology phase I trial is always done in advanced cancer patients and in the great majority of cases after several therapeutic tentative having failed. It is never done in healthy volunteers. Patients have to be informed of the nature of the trial with the possibility of a therapeutic response as an associated objective.