Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 52(1): 93-96, 01 jan. 2024. ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-229181

ABSTRACT

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a more frequent pathology in adults than in children, because, in most cases, allergic sensitization requires a prolonged exposure time to the allergen, mostly months or years. In fact, the actual incidence and prevalence of ACD in children and adolescents is unknown. However, there is a hypothesis that ACD is increasing in the pediatric population. Among the allergens involved in ACD, the frequency of paraphenylenediamine (PPDA) is increasing. PPDA is one of the five most common contact allergens in the general population and one of the 10 most common contact allergens in children. The most relevant sources today are henna tattoos and hair dyes. Currently, European Union legislation limits the use of PPDA in hair dyes and prohibits its use in henna tattoos. Despite this legislation, the use of henna tattoos with PPDA is becoming more frequent in younger ages. We report an early presentation of ACD by PPDA, with a permanent hypopigmented skin area as an aftermath, in a 7-year-old male child. We believe that health authorities should advise against making these tattoos in children (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Contact/diagnosis
2.
Artif Intell Med ; 143: 102630, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37673587

ABSTRACT

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in childhood that often persists into adulthood. Objectively diagnosing ADHD can be challenging due to the reliance on subjective questionnaires in clinical assessment. Fortunately, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have shown promise in providing objective diagnoses through the analysis of medical images or activity recordings. These AI-based techniques have demonstrated accurate ADHD diagnosis; however, the growing complexity of deep learning models has introduced a lack of interpretability. These models often function as black boxes, unable to offer meaningful insights into the data patterns that characterize ADHD. OBJECTIVE: This paper proposes a methodology to interpret the output of an AI-based diagnosis system for combined ADHD in age and gender-stratified populations. METHODS: Our system is based on the analysis of 24 hour-long activity records using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to classify spectrograms of activity windows. These windows are interpreted using occlusion maps to highlight the time-frequency patterns explaining ADHD activity. RESULTS: Significant differences in the frequency patterns between ADHD and controls both in diurnal and nocturnal activity were found for all the populations. Temporal dispersion also presented differences in the male population. CONCLUSION: The proposed interpretation techniques for CNNs highlighted gender- and age-related differences between ADHD patients and controls. Leveraging these differences could potentially lead to improved diagnostic accuracy, especially if a larger and more balanced dataset is utilized. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings pave the way for the development of an AI-based diagnosis system for ADHD that offers interpretability, thereby providing valuable insights into the underlying etiology of the disease.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Deep Learning , Humans , Male , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Artificial Intelligence , Neural Networks, Computer
3.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 962022 Mar 23.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35318300

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder characterised primarily by three core symptoms: inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. It is one of the most commonly diagnosed childhood psychiatric disorders, with a worldwide prevalence of between 3% and 5%, and between 6% and 7% in the Spanish population. The aim of the study is to analyse the trend in the consumption of drugs used for the treatment of ADHD between 2010-2019 in Castilla y León. METHODS: Epidemiological registry study of all dispensing in pharmacies in Castilla y León between 2010 and 2019 to patients under 19 years of age, of active substance N06BA04 (methylphenidate), N06BA09 (atomoxetine), N06BA12 (lisdexamfetamine), N06BA07 (modafinil) and C02AC02 (guanfacine). Data on drug use were obtained from the information system for the pharmaceutical provision of Castilla y León, CONCYLIA. Frequencies in absolute values and the corresponding percentages were calculated. Student's t-test was used to estimate differences between continuous variables and Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical variables, while the trend in consumption was analysed using the Cochran-Armitage test. RESULTS: ADHD medication was dispensed annually to 1.77% of the population, with consumption being more than three times higher in boys than in girls (2.69% vs 0.81%; p=0.001). The age group with the highest peak use was 10-14 years with 3.42%. Methylphenidate was the drug used by the highest percentage of the population (2.44%) followed by lisdexamfetamine (0.37%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 2 out of every 100 people aged 0-19 years were treated with some ADHD medication, mainly methylphenidate, in Castilla y León between 2010 and 2019.


OBJETIVO: El trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad (TDAH) es un trastorno común del neurodesarrollo infantil que se caracteriza fundamentalmente por tres síntomas a nivel central: falta de atención, hiperactividad e impulsividad. Se trata de uno de los trastornos psiquiátricos infantiles más comúnmente diagnosticados, con una prevalencia a nivel mundial que oscila entre el 3% y el 5%, y entre el 6% y el 7% en la población española. El objetivo del estudio es analizar la tendencia del consumo de los fármacos utilizados para el tratamiento del TDAH entre los años 2010-2019 en Castilla y León. METODOS: Estudio epidemiológico de registro de todas las dispensaciones realizadas en las oficinas de farmacia de Castilla y León entre el año 2010 y 2019 a pacientes menores de 19 años, de los principios activos N06BA04 (metilfenidato), N06BA09 (atomoxetina), N06BA12 (lisdexanfetamina), N06BA07 (modafinilo) y C02AC02 (guanfacina). Los datos de utilización de medicamentos se obtuvieron a partir del sistema de información para la prestación farmacéutica de Castilla y León, CONCYLIA. Se calcularon frecuencias en valores absolutos y los porcentajes correspondientes. Se utilizó el test-t de Student para estimar diferencias entre variables continuas y el test Chi-cuadrado de Pearson para las categóricas, mientras que la tendencia de consumo se analizó mediante el test de Cochran-Armitage. RESULTADOS: Se dispensaron anualmente los medicamentos para el TDAH al 1,77% de la población, siendo el consumo más de tres veces mayor en niños que en niñas (2,69% vs 0,81%; p=0,001). La franja de edad donde se observó el mayor pico de consumo fue de los 10 a 14 años con un 3,42%. El metilfenidato fue el medicamento consumido por un mayor porcentaje de la población (2,44%) seguido de la lisdexanfetamina (0,37%). CONCLUSIONES: Aproximadamente 2 de cada 100 personas entre 0 y 19 años fueron tratadas con algún medicamento para la TDAH, fundamentalmente metilfenidato, en Castilla y León entre 2010 y 2019.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Central Nervous System Stimulants , Methylphenidate , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Adult , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Rev. esp. salud pública ; 96: e202203033-e202203033, Mar. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-211288

ABSTRACT

Fundamentos: El trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad (TDAH) es un trastorno común del neurodesarrollo infantil que se caracteriza fundamentalmente por tres síntomas a nivel central: falta de atención, hiperactividad e impulsividad. Se trata de uno de los trastornos psiquiátricos infantiles más comúnmente diagnosticados, con una prevalencia a nivel mundial que oscila entre el 3% y el 5%, y entre el 6% y el 7% en la población española. El objetivo del estudio es analizar la tendencia del consumo de los fármacos utilizados para el tratamiento del TDAH entre los años 2010-2019 en Castilla y León. Métodos: Estudio epidemiológico de registro de todas las dispensaciones realizadas en las oficinas de farmacia de Castilla y León entre el año 2010 y 2019 a pacientes menores de 19 años, de los principios activos N06BA04 (metilfenidato), N06BA09 (atomoxetina), N06BA12 (lisdexanfetamina), N06BA07 (modafinilo) y C02AC02 (guanfacina). Los datos de utilización de medicamentos se obtuvieron a partir del sistema de información para la prestación farmacéutica de Castilla y León, CONCYLIA. Se calcularon frecuencias en valores absolutos y los porcentajes correspondientes. Se utilizó el test-t de Student para estimar diferencias entre variables continuas y el test Chi-cuadrado de Pearson para las categóricas, mientras que la tendencia de consumo se analizó mediante el test de Cochran-Armitage. Resultados: Se dispensaron anualmente los medicamentos para el TDAH al 1,77% de la población, siendo el consumo más de tres veces mayor en niños que en niñas (2,69% vs 0,81%; p=0,001). La franja de edad donde se observó el mayor pico de consumo fue de los 10 a 14 años con un 3,42%. El metilfenidato fue el medicamento consumido por un mayor porcentaje de la población (2,44%) seguido de la lisdexanfetamina (0,37%).(AU)


Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood neurodevelopmental disorder characterised primarily by three core symptoms: inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity. It is one of the most commonly diagnosed childhood psychiatric disorders, with a worldwide prevalence of between 3% and 5%, and between 6% and 7% in the Spanish population. The aim of the study is to analyse the trend in the consumption of drugs used for the treatment of ADHD between 2010-2019 in Castilla y León. Methods: Epidemiological registry study of all dispensing in pharmacies in Castilla y León between 2010 and 2019 to patients under 19 years of age, of active substance N06BA04 (methylphenidate), N06BA09 (atomoxetine), N06BA12 (lisdexamfetamine), N06BA07 (modafinil) and C02AC02 (guanfacine). Data on drug use were obtained from the information system for the pharmaceutical provision of Castilla y León, CONCYLIA. Frequencies in absolute values and the corresponding percentages were calculated. Student’s t-test was used to estimate differences between continuous variables and Pearson’s Chi-square test for categorical variables, while the trend in consumption was analysed using the CochranArmitage test. Results: ADHD medication was dispensed annually to 1.77% of the population, with consumption beingmore than three times higher in boys than in girls (2.69% vs 0.81%; p=0.001). The age group with the highest peak use was 10-14 years with 3.42%. Methylphenidate was the drug used by the highest percentage of the population (2.44%) followed by lisdexamfetamine (0.37%). Conclusions: Approximately 2 out of every 100 people aged 0-19 years were treated with some ADHD medication, mainly methylphenidate, in Castilla y León between 2010 and 2019. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Pharmacoepidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Comorbidity , Methylphenidate , Atomoxetine Hydrochloride , Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate , Modafinil , Guanfacine , Prevalence , Public Health , Health Promotion , Spain , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Retrospective Studies
5.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform ; 24(9): 2690-2700, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31905156

ABSTRACT

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral disorder in children and adolescents. However, its etiology is still unknown, and this hinders the existence of reliable, fast and inexpensive standard diagnostic methods. OBJECTIVE: This paper proposes an end-to-end methodology for automatic diagnosis of the combined type of ADHD. METHODS: Diagnosis is based on the analysis of 24 hour-long activity records using Convolutional Neural Networks to classify spectrograms of activity windows. RESULTS: We achieve up to [Formula: see text] average sensitivity, [Formula: see text] specificity and AUC values over [Formula: see text]. Overall, our figures overcome those obtained by actigraphy-based methods reported in the literature as well as others based on more expensive (and not so convenient) acquisition methods. CONCLUSION: These results reinforce the idea that combining deep learning techniques together with actimetry can lead to a robust and efficient system for objective ADHD diagnosis. SIGNIFICANCE: Reliance on simple activity measurements leads to an inexpensive and non-invasive objective diagn-ostic method, which can be easily implemented with daily devices.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Actigraphy , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Child , Humans , Neural Networks, Computer
6.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 90(6): 386-392, jun. 2019. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-186679

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La prevalencia del embarazo múltiple está experimentando un ascenso en los últimos años, lo que conlleva un aumento de la morbimortalidad fetal y de la morbilidad materna. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la evolución de los partos múltiples en Castilla y León durante 13 años y sus implicaciones maternas y fetales. Material y métodos: Estudio de asociación cruzada, sobre el conjunto mínimo básico de datos (CMBD), de altas hospitalarias de la red Sanidad de Castilla y León (SACYL) entre 2001 y 2013. Se realizó un análisis de tendencias mediante regresión lineal de joinpoint, un análisis ritmométrico y un análisis multivariante mediante regresión logística binaria. Resultados: A lo largo de los 13 años de estudio se observa una tendencia creciente en la proporción de partos múltiples, en contraste con los únicos, con un porcentaje anual de cambio del 3,4% (IC del 95%: 2,5-4,4%). Se encontró asociación estadística entre la edad materna, la tolerancia anormal a la glucosa, el parto operatorio, la macrosomía fetal, el parto prematuro, la muerte fetal, las malposiciones fetales, la fecundación in vitro y los estados hipertensivos maternos y el parto gemelar, destacando que la fecundación in vitro se asocia con un exceso de riesgo de 9,3 veces de parto múltiple (IC del 95%: 7,4-11,5), así como la edad de la madre se asocia con un exceso de riesgo del 5% por cada año de edad (OR: 1,05; IC 95%: 1,04-1,05). No se evidenció estacionalidad en los partos múltiples en contraposición con los únicos. Conclusiones: Los partos múltiples experimentaron un continuo ascenso, sin seguir un ritmo estacional, asociados a la extensión del uso de las técnicas de reproducción asistida y al retraso en la edad de la maternidad, lo que conlleva mayor morbimortalidad fetal y materna


Introduction: Multiple pregnancy has increased in prevalence in the last few years, which could lead to more foetal and maternal morbidity issues. The aim of this study is to describe the trend of multiple pregnancy deliveries in Castilla y León during the last 13years and the subsequent impact on foetal and maternal health. Material and methods: Data was collected from the hospital discharge reports registered in the Regional Health-care database (SACYL: Health care in Castilla y León) between 2001 and 2013. A cross sectional descriptive study was conducted, including trend analysis with log-linear joint point model, a rhythm metric study, as well as a risk assessment with multivariate analysis. Results: A pronounced upward trend was observed in the proportion of multiple deliveries in this time period, compared to single ones, with an annual percentage change of 3.4% (95% CI: 2.5-4.4). Multiple pregnancy was significantly correlated with advanced maternal age, abnormal glucose tolerance, dystocia and caesarean section delivery, premature birth, foetal malposition, foetal macrosomia, stillbirth, in vitro fertilisation, and hypertensive episodes of pregnancy. In vitro fertilization showed a 9.3 fold increased risk in multiple pregnancy (95% CI: 7.4-11.5), with maternal age increasing the risk up to 5% per year of age (OR: 1.05: 95%CI: 1.04-1.05). No seasonal rhythm was observed in multiple deliveries compared with single ones. Conclusion: Multiple pregnancy has experienced a continuous increase, with no seasonal trend, and is associated with the increase in assisted reproductive technology and advanced maternal age. This involves more problems regarding foetal and maternal morbidity and mortality


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Multiple Birth Offspring/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy, Multiple/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors
7.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 90(6): 386-392, 2019 Jun.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30237019

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Multiple pregnancy has increased in prevalence in the last few years, which could lead to more foetal and maternal morbidity issues. The aim of this study is to describe the trend of multiple pregnancy deliveries in Castilla y León during the last 13years and the subsequent impact on foetal and maternal health. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was collected from the hospital discharge reports registered in the Regional Health-care database (SACYL: Health care in Castilla y León) between 2001 and 2013. A cross sectional descriptive study was conducted, including trend analysis with log-linear joint point model, a rhythm metric study, as well as a risk assessment with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A pronounced upward trend was observed in the proportion of multiple deliveries in this time period, compared to single ones, with an annual percentage change of 3.4% (95% CI: 2.5-4.4). Multiple pregnancy was significantly correlated with advanced maternal age, abnormal glucose tolerance, dystocia and caesarean section delivery, premature birth, foetal malposition, foetal macrosomia, stillbirth, in vitro fertilisation, and hypertensive episodes of pregnancy. In vitro fertilization showed a 9.3 fold increased risk in multiple pregnancy (95% CI: 7.4-11.5), with maternal age increasing the risk up to 5% per year of age (OR: 1.05: 95%CI: 1.04-1.05). No seasonal rhythm was observed in multiple deliveries compared with single ones. CONCLUSION: Multiple pregnancy has experienced a continuous increase, with no seasonal trend, and is associated with the increase in assisted reproductive technology and advanced maternal age. This involves more problems regarding foetal and maternal morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Multiple Birth Offspring/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy, Multiple/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors
8.
Psicothema (Oviedo) ; 29(1): 103-110, feb. 2017. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-160218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this research is to analyze Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scales IV (ADHD RS-IV) criteria validity and its clinical usefulness for the assessment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as a function of assessment method and age. METHODOLOGY: A sample was obtained from an epidemiological study (n = 1095, 6-16 years). Clinical cases of ADHD (ADHD-CL) were selected by dimensional ADHD RS-IV and later by clinical interview (DSM-IV). ADHD-CL cases were compared with four categorical results of ADHD RS-IV provided by parents (CATPA), teachers (CATPR), either parents or teachers (CATPAOPR) and both parents and teachers (CATPA&PR). Criterion validity and clinical usefulness of the answer modalities to ADHD RS-IV were studied. RESULTS: ADHD-CL rate was 6.9% in childhood, 6.2% in preadolescence and 6.9% in adolescence. Alternative methods to the clinical interview led to increased numbers of ADHD cases in all age groups analyzed, in the following sequence: CATPAOPR> CATPRO> CATPA> CATPA&PR> ADHD-CL. CATPA&PR was the procedure with the greatest validity, specificity and clinical usefulness in all three age groups, particularly in the childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated use of ADHD RS-IV leads to an increase in ADHD cases compared to clinical interview, and varies depending on the procedure used


ANTECEDENTES: se estudia la validez de criterio y utilidad clínica del Attention Deficit Hiperactivity Disorder Rating Scales IV (ADHD RS-IV) en el Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad (TDAH) en función del método y edad. MÉTODO: muestra extraída de un estudio epidemiológico (n = 1095, 6-16 años). Los casos de TDAH clínico (TDAH-CL) fueron seleccionados mediante ADHD RS-IV dimensional y entrevista clínica (DSM-IV) y fueron comparados con cuatro modalidades categoriales de respuesta al ADHD RS-IV implementado por padres (CATPA), profesores (CATPR), padres o profesores indistintamente (CATPAOPR) y/o conjuntamente (CATPAYPR). Se estudió la validez de criterio y utilidad clínica de las modalidades de respuesta. RESULTADOS: la tasa de TDAHCL es 6,9% en infancia, 6,2% en preadolescencia y 6,9% en adolescencia. Los procedimientos alternativos a la entrevista clínica aumentan los casos de TDAH en los tres grupos de edad, siguiendo la sucesión CATPAOPR > CATPRO > CATPA > CATPAYPR > TDAH-CL. El procedimiento con mayor índice de validez, especifidad, utilidad clínica y capacidad predictiva de TDAH fue CATPAYPR. CONCLUSIONES: la utilización de una versión categorial del ADHD RS-IV produce un incremento de casos de TDAH respecto a la entrevista clínica que varía en función del método utilizado


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Psychometrics/methods , Behavior Rating Scale/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Reproducibility of Results , Interview, Psychological
9.
Psicothema ; 29(1): 103-110, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28126067

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this research is to analyze Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scales IV (ADHD RS-IV) criteria validity and its clinical usefulness for the assessment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) as a function of assessment method and age. METHODOLOGY: A sample was obtained from an epidemiological study (n = 1095, 6-16 years). Clinical cases of ADHD (ADHD-CL) were selected by dimensional ADHD RS-IV and later by clinical interview (DSM-IV). ADHD-CL cases were compared with four categorical results of ADHD RS-IV provided by parents (CATPA), teachers (CATPR), either parents or teachers (CATPAOPR) and both parents and teachers (CATPA&PR). Criterion validity and clinical usefulness of the answer modalities to ADHD RS-IV were studied. RESULTS: ADHD-CL rate was 6.9% in childhood, 6.2% in preadolescence and 6.9% in adolescence. Alternative methods to the clinical interview led to increased numbers of ADHD cases in all age groups analyzed, in the following sequence: CATPAOPR> CATPRO> CATPA> CATPA&PR> ADHD-CL. CATPA&PR was the procedure with the greatest validity, specificity and clinical usefulness in all three age groups, particularly in the childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated use of ADHD RS-IV leads to an increase in ADHD cases compared to clinical interview, and varies depending on the procedure used.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Symptom Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Child , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Parents , Prevalence , Sampling Studies , Teaching
10.
Rev. psiquiatr. salud ment ; 7(2): 80-87, abr.-jun. 2014. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-122171

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El trastorno negativista desafiante (TND) se caracteriza por un patrón de comportamiento negativista, desafiante, desobediente y hostil, dirigido a las figuras de autoridad. El TND es uno de los motivos más frecuentes de consulta clínica en salud mental durante la infancia y adolescencia. Presenta gran morbilidad y disfuncionalidad, mostrando repercusiones futuras si no es tratado de forma temprana. Objetivo: Determinar la tasa de prevalencia de TND en escolares de 6-16 años de Castilla y León (España). Material y métodos: Estudio epidemiológico poblacional, con diseño muestral polietápico estratificado, proporcional y por conglomerados. Muestra analizada: 1.049 sujetos. Casos definidos según criterios DSM-IV. Resultados: La prevalencia de TND es 5,6% (IC 95%: 4,2-7%). Prevalencia género masculino = 6,8%; femenino = 4,3%. Prevalencia educación secundaria = 6,2%; educación primaria = 5,3%. No existen diferencias significativas en función del sexo, edad, tipo de centro, ni por zona sociodemográfica. La prevalencia de TND sin considerar deterioro funcional aumentaría al 7,4%. Los casos de TND presentan significativamente peores resultados académicos (resultados académicos globales, lectura, matemáticas y expresión escrita) y peor conducta en clase (relación con compañeros, respeto a las normas, destrezas de organización, realización de tareas académicas e interrupción de la clase). Conclusiones: Castilla y León presenta una tasa de prevalencia de TND levemente superior a la observada en publicaciones internacionales. En función de su distribución por edad, morbilidad y repercusión clínica disfuncional, parece necesaria una planificación sanitaria que incida en un diagnóstico temprano e intervención preventiva (AU)


Introduction: Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is characterized by a pattern of negative, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures. ODD is one of the most frequent reasons for clinical consultation on mental health during childhood and adolescence. ODD has a high morbidity and dysfunction, and has important implications for the future if not treated early. Objective: To determine the prevalence of ODD in schoolchildren aged 6-16 years in Castile and Leon (Spain). Material and methods: Population study with a stratified multistage sample, and a proportional cluster design. Sample analyzed: 1,049. Cases were defined according to DSM-IV criteria. Results: An overall prevalence rate of 5.6% was found (95% CI: 4.2%---7%). Male gender prevalence = 6.8%; female = 4.3%. Prevalence in secondary education = 6.2%; primary education = 5.3%. No significant differences by gender, age, grade, type of school, or demographic area were found. ODD prevalence without considering functional impairment, such as is performed in some research, would increase the prevalence to 7.4%. ODD cases have significantly worse academic outcomes (overall academic performance, reading, maths and writing), and worse classroom behavior (relationship with peers, respect for rules, organizational skills, academic tasks, and disruption of the class). Conclusions: Castile and Leon has a prevalence rate of ODD slightly higher to that observed in international publications. Depending on the distribution by age, morbidity and clinical dysfunctional impact, an early diagnosis and a preventive intervention are required for health planning (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/epidemiology , Learning Disabilities/prevention & control , Passive-Aggressive Personality Disorder/epidemiology , Negativism , Cluster Sampling , Early Medical Intervention , Risk Factors
11.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment ; 7(2): 80-7, 2014.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24161231

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is characterized by a pattern of negative, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures. ODD is one of the most frequent reasons for clinical consultation on mental health during childhood and adolescence. ODD has a high morbidity and dysfunction, and has important implications for the future if not treated early. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of ODD in schoolchildren aged 6-16 years in Castile and Leon (Spain). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Population study with a stratified multistage sample, and a proportional cluster design. Sample analyzed: 1,049. Cases were defined according to DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: An overall prevalence rate of 5.6% was found (95% CI: 4.2%-7%). Male gender prevalence=6.8%; female=4.3%. Prevalence in secondary education=6.2%; primary education=5.3%. No significant differences by gender, age, grade, type of school, or demographic area were found. ODD prevalence without considering functional impairment, such as is performed in some research, would increase the prevalence to 7.4%. ODD cases have significantly worse academic outcomes (overall academic performance, reading, maths and writing), and worse classroom behavior (relationship with peers, respect for rules, organizational skills, academic tasks, and disruption of the class). CONCLUSIONS: Castile and Leon has a prevalence rate of ODD slightly higher to that observed in international publications. Depending on the distribution by age, morbidity and clinical dysfunctional impact, an early diagnosis and a preventive intervention are required for health planning.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Spain/epidemiology
12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23366855

ABSTRACT

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the most common mental health problem in childhood and adolescence. It is commonly diagnosed by means of subjective methods which tend to overestimate the severity of the pathology. A number of objective methods also exist, but they are either expensive or time-consuming. Some recent proposals based on nonlinear processing of activity registries have deserved special attention. Since they rely on actigraphy measurements, they are both inexpensive and non-invasive. Among these methods, those shown to have higher reliability are based on single-channel complexity assessment of the activity patterns. This way, potentially useful information related to the interaction between the different channels is discarded. In this paper we propose a new methodology for ADHD diagnosis based on joint complexity assessment of multichannel activity registries. Results on real data show that the proposed method constitute a useful diagnostic aid tool reaching 87:10% sensitivity and 84.38% specificity. The combination of ADHD indicators extracted with the proposed method with single-channel complexity-based indices previously proposed lead to sensitivity and specifity values above 90%.


Subject(s)
Actigraphy/methods , Actigraphy/statistics & numerical data , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Registries , Adult , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nonlinear Dynamics , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spain/epidemiology
13.
Psicothema (Oviedo) ; 23(4): 818-823, oct.-dic. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-91449

ABSTRACT

El objetivo de este estudio fue buscar el mejor modelo estadístico de estilos cognitivos, basado en las pruebas MFFT-20, CEFT y STROOP para predecir el trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH), analizando la validez del modelo para el diagnóstico del trastorno. Se estudió una muestra de 100 casos de TDAH (criterios DSM-IV) y 100 controles entre 7 y 11 años. Los controles fueron reclutados de forma aleatoria y emparejados según edad, sexo y zona sociodemográfica con los casos. Los casos presentaron en promedio mayor impulsividad (d: 1,28), menor flexibilidad cognitiva (d: ,91) y más dependencia de campo (d: 1,62) que los controles. El modelo de regresión logística que mejor predice TDAH está formado por las variables edad, CEFT, MFFT-20 y STROOP, y la fórmula derivada del modelo presenta una sensibilidad del 85% y especifidad del 85% para TDAH, tomando como prueba de referencia criterios DSM-IV. El modelo estadístico de estilos cognitivos presenta indicadores de adecuada validez diagnóstica en TDAH, contribuyendo a incrementar la objetividad en su análisis (AU)


The purpose of this study was to determine the best statistical model of cognitive styles, based on the MFFT-20, CEFT and Stroop tests to predict attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), analyzing the validity of the model for the diagnosis of the disease. We studied 100 ADHD cases (DSM-IV criteria) and 100 controls, age ranging between 7 and 11 years. Controls were randomly recruited and matched in age, gender and sociodemographic area with ADHD cases. On average, ADHD cases showed more impulsiveness (d: 1.28), less cognitive flexibility (d: 0.91) and more field dependence (d: 1.62) than controls. The logistic regression model that predicts ADHD best is made up of age, CEFT, MFFT-20 and Stroop tests and the formula derived from the model shows 85% sensitivity and 85% specificity for ADHD, regarding the DSM-IV criteria as the standard. The statistical model of cognitive styles presents valid indicators to diagnose ADHD, contributing to an increase in the objectivity of its analysis (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Models, Statistical , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Reproducibility of Results/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology
14.
Psicothema ; 23(4): 818-23, 2011 Nov.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22047878

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to determine the best statistical model of cognitive styles, based on the MFFT-20, CEFT and Stroop tests to predict attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), analyzing the validity of the model for the diagnosis of the disease. We studied 100 ADHD cases (DSM-IV criteria) and 100 controls, age ranging between 7 and 11 years. Controls were randomly recruited and matched in age, gender and sociodemographic area with ADHD cases. On average, ADHD cases showed more impulsiveness (d: 1.28), less cognitive flexibility (d: 0.91) and more field dependence (d: 1.62) than controls. The logistic regression model that predicts ADHD best is made up of age, CEFT, MFFT-20 and Stroop tests and the formula derived from the model shows 85% sensitivity and 85% specificity for ADHD, regarding the DSM-IV criteria as the standard. The statistical model of cognitive styles presents valid indicators to diagnose ADHD, contributing to an increase in the objectivity of its analysis.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Cognition , Models, Psychological , Models, Statistical , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
15.
Rev Neurol ; 50(6): 333-40, 2010 Mar 16.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20309831

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this study is to analyse the differences in the Stroop effect between cases with attention deficit hyper-activity disorder (ADHD) and controls. It also seeks to find the best model based on the third task of the colours and words test (Stroop-CW) for predicting ADHD and to analyse the validity of the Stroop-CW test for diagnosing the disorder. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sample studied consisted of 100 cases of ADHD -according to Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) criteria- and 100 controls, between 7 and 11 years of age, who were evaluated using the Stroop test. The controls were recruited at random and paired by age, sex and sociodemographic area with the cases. RESULTS: The cases present a mean cognitive style that is significantly less flexible (d = -1.06) and they also display a lower capacity to inhibit or control automatic responses than the controls at all ages (7 years: d = 1.67; 8 years: d = 1.02; 9 years: d = 1.32; 10 years: d = 2.04; 11 years: d = 0.89). The model of logistic regression analysis that best predicts ADHD is made up of age and Stroop-CW. The formulation derived from the model offers a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 72%, taking the criteria of the DSM-IV for ADHD as the reference test. CONCLUSIONS: The Stroop-CW test presents usefulness and complementary criteria validity for the diagnosis of ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Stroop Test , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
16.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 50(6): 333-340, 16 mar., 2010. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-86816

ABSTRACT

Objetivos. Analizar las diferencias entre casos de trastorno por déficit de atención/hiperactividad (TDAH) y controles en el efecto Stroop, y buscar el mejor modelo basado en la tercera prueba del test de colores y palabras (Stroop-PC) que permita predecir el TDAH y analizar la validez del Stroop-PC para el diagnóstico del trastorno. Sujetos y métodos. Se estudia una muestra de 100 casos de TDAH –criterios del Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales, 4 ed. (DSM-IV)– y 100 controles, entre 7 y 11 años, evaluados mediante el test de Stroop. Los controles fueron reclutados de forma aleatoria y emparejados según la edad, el sexo y la zona sociodemográfica con los casos. Resultados. Los casos presentan un estilo cognitivo medio significativamente menos flexible (d = –1,06) y reflejan menor capacidad para inhibir o controlar respuestas automáticas que los controles en todas las edades (7 años: d = –1,67; 8 años: d = –1,02; 9 años: d = –1,32; 10 años: d = –2,04; 11 años: d = –0,89). El modelo de regresión logística que mejor predice el TDAH está formado por edad y Stroop-PC. La formulación derivada del modelo presenta una sensibilidad del 81% y una especificidad del 72%, tomando como prueba de referencia los criterios del DSM-IV para el TDAH. Conclusiones. El Stroop-PC presenta utilidad y validez de criterio complementaria para el diagnóstico de TDAH (AU)


Aims. The aim of this study is to analyse the differences in the Stroop effect between cases with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and controls. It also seeks to find the best model based on the third task of the colours and words test (Stroop-CW) for predicting ADHD and to analyse the validity of the Stroop-CW test for diagnosing the disorder. Subjects and methods. The sample studied consisted of 100 cases of ADHD –according to Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) criteria– and 100 controls, between 7 and 11 years of age, who were evaluated using the Stroop test. The controls were recruited at random and paired by age, sex and sociodemographic area with the cases. Results. The cases present a mean cognitive style that is significantly less flexible (d = –1.06) and they also display a lower capacity to inhibit or control automatic responses than the controls at all ages (7 years: d = 1.67; 8 years: d = 1.02; 9 years: d = 1.32; 10 years: d = 2.04; 11 years: d = 0.89). The model of logistic regression analysis that best predicts ADHD is made up of age and Stroop-CW. The formulation derived from the model offers a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 72%, taking the criteria of the DSM-IV for ADHD as the reference test. Conclusions. The Stroop-CW test presents usefulness and complementary criteria validity for the diagnosis of ADHD(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Case-Control Studies , Logistic Models , Color Perception Tests , Word Association Tests
17.
Clín. salud ; 21(1): 93-103, mar. 2010. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-85344

ABSTRACT

El estudio analiza diferencias entre casos de Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad (TDAH) y controles en su modo global / analítico de procesar la información, buscando el mejor modelo basado en el Children’s Embedded Figures Test (CEFT) que permita predecir TDAH y analizando la validez de la prueba para el diagnóstico del trastorno. Se estudia una muestra de 100 casos de TDAH (criterios DSM-IV) y 100 controles, entre 7 y 11 años, evaluados mediante el CEFT. Los controles fueron reclutados de forma aleatoria y emparejados según edad, sexo y zona sociodemográfica con los casos. Los casos presentan un estilo cognitivo medio significativamente mas dependiente de campo (d = 1.36), reflejando un modo de procesamiento mas global que los controles en todas las edades. El modelo de regresión logística que mejor predice TDAH está formado por edad, sexo y CEFT. La formulación derivada del modelo presenta sensibilidad del 80% y especifidad del 84%, tomando como prueba de referencia criterios DSM-IV para TDAH. Concluimos valorando que el CEFTpresenta utilidad y adecuada validez de criterio para TDAH (AU)


Objectives: To assess the differences among patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and control subjects, in relation to their global/analytical way of processing information and to find the best model based in Children´s Embedded Figures Test (CEFT) which permits prediction and diagnosis of ADHD, and analyzing the validity of the test for the diagnostic of the disease. Method: We study 100 ADHD cases (DSM-IV criteria) and 100 controls, ranging between 7 and 11 years of age, analyzed with CEFT. Controls were randomly recruited and matched by age, gender and sociodemography area with cases. Results: Cases show an average cognitive style significantly more field dependent (d = 1.36), reflecting a more global way of processing information than controls at all ages. The logistic regression model that best predicts ADHD is constituted by age, gender and CEFT direct marks and the derived formula from the model shows an 80% of sensitivity and a 84% specificity for ADHD, taking as gold standard the DSM-IV criteria. Conclusion: CEFT test shows utility and of appropriate validity for diagnosing ADHD (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Psychological Tests , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...