Prevalence of Nasal Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Objetive: Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus have an increased risk of developing infections caused by S. aureus. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of S. aureus nasal colonization in patients with RA and its relationship to RA treatments. METHODS: Two hundred and seven patients with RA and 37 healthy controls were prospectively included in a cross-sectional study. A nasal secretion sample was collected by swab from both anterior nostrils and was referred to the hospital's microbiology department for culturing. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients (168 women, 78%) was 61 ± 12 years old. The mean disease duration was 13 ± 10 years. Seventy-six percent of the patients were positive for Rheumatoid Factor (RF), and 71% were positive for Anti-citrullinated Peptides Antibodies (ACPA). Seventy percent had joint erosions. The mean DAS28 was 3.1 ± 2.2. S. aureus nasal colonization was found in 36% of the RA patients and 35% of the controls. Three patients and no controls were resistant to oxacilin/ mupirocin. The patients who were positive for ACPA had a higher prevalence of S. aureus colonization (43% vs. 17%; p < 0.05). The colonization prevalence in the patients treated with glucocorticoids was 32% (n: 133); methotrexate and/or leflunomide, 37% (n: 167); anti-TNF agents, 46% (n: 54), p < 0.05 versus patients not treated with anti-TNF agents; rituximab, 22% (n: 18); tocilizumab, 39% (n: 18). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of S. aureus nasal colonization in patients with RA does not appear to be greater than that of the general population. Anti-TNF agents might confer a higher prevalence of colonization.

Treatment of endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound-guided drainage under GnRH analogues and recombinant interleukin-2 left in the cysts.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the therapeutic results of one dose of 3 million IU of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) left intracyst (group I) versus two doses with a 1-month interval (group II) after transvaginal ultrasound (US)-guided drainage of endometriomas under the effect of GnRH analogues. METHODS: Prospective and randomized clinical trial (helped by a random number table) at a University Hospital. Twenty-four consecutive patients with endometriomas initially sent to us for laparotomy and conservative surgery for endometriosis were included. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with GnRH analogues every 28 days, 3 doses. Under their effect, one or two transvaginal US-guided punctures were performed in order to aspirate the endometriomas, and 3 million IU of rIL-2 were left in the aspirated cysts each time. CLINICAL RESULTS: two menstruations after GnRH analogues. Other secondary outcome measures were: the time until recurrence of cysts, symptoms and CA-125 >35 U/ml, and the need for further medical or surgical treatment. RESULTS: They were moderate or good in >50% of cases with one drainage and one dose of 3 million IU of rIL-2 intracyst, but were better with a second drainage and two doses of rIL-2 (25 vs. 58.3% 'good results'). There were fewer recurrences and the interval before recurrence was longer after two doses but differences were not significant. Six patients from group I (50%) and 3 from group II (25%) needed laparotomy and conservative surgery at 17.5 +/- 8.7 months (total time of follow-up = 33 +/- 8.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of endometriomas with transvaginal US-guided drainage and rIL-2 left in the cysts under endometrial suppressive therapy with GnRH analogues has beneficial effects, improving clinical manifestations and avoiding some surgical therapies. The use of a higher dose of rIL-2 does not produce better results, whereas drainage + rIL-2 twice does.