ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the association between use of fertility drugs and colorectal cancer among women with infertility. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): The study cohort was obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and consisted of all women with infertility aged 20-45 years living in Denmark during 1995-2017. INTERVENTION(S): Information on the use of specific types of fertility drugs, colorectal cancer diagnoses, covariates, and vital status were obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and Danish national registers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for colorectal cancer overall and rectal and colon cancer separately. RESULTS(S): Among 148,036 women in the final study cohort, 205 women were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Ever use of clomiphene citrate (CC) was associated with a lower rate of colorectal cancer (unadjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89; adjusted HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93). However, the lower rate was only seen among women who first used CC >8 years ago (unadjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41-0.76; adjusted HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75). No marked associations were found between the use of any of other types of fertility drugs and colorectal cancer. The results for colon and rectal cancer analyzed separately were similar, except for a suggestion of a decreased risk of rectal cancer associated with the use of gonadotropins (adjusted HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.20-1.08). CONCLUSION(S): Among women with infertility, the use of most types of fertility drugs was not associated with colorectal cancer. However, CC may decrease the risk of colorectal cancer and gonadotropins might decrease the risk of rectal cancer, but we cannot rule out that these findings may be more related to the underlying conditions in these women or are chance findings. Consequently, the results from this study should be investigated further in large epidemiological studies.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Fertility Agents , Infertility, Female , Rectal Neoplasms , Clomiphene , Cohort Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Fertility , Fertility Agents/adverse effects , Gonadotropins , Humans , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Infertility, Female/therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between fertility drugs and tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). METHODS: This cohort study was based on The Danish Infertility Cohort and included 148,016 infertile women living in Denmark (1995-2017). The study cohort was linked to national registers to obtain information on use of specific fertility drugs, cancer diagnoses, covariates, emigration, and vital status. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all CNS tumors and separately for gliomas, meningiomas and diverse benign tumors of the brain and other parts of the CNS. RESULTS: During a median 11.3 years of follow-up, 328 women were diagnosed with CNS tumors. No marked associations were observed between use of the fertility drugs clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor modulators and progesterone and CNS tumors. However, use of human chorionic gonadotropin was associated with a decreased rate of meningiomas (HR 0.49 95% CI 0.28-0.87). No clear associations with CNS tumors were observed according to time since first use or cumulative dose for any of the fertility drugs. CONCLUSION: No associations between use of most types of fertility drugs and CNS tumors were observed. However, our findings only apply to premenopausal women and additional studies with longer follow-up time are necessary.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Fertility Agents , Infertility, Female , Meningeal Neoplasms , Meningioma , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Fertility Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be at increased long-term risk of hospitalization for somatic diseases. However, large population-based cohort studies with risk estimates for survivors successfully cured without experiencing a relapse or requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are lacking. METHODS: Danish and Swedish patients diagnosed with ALL before age 20 years in 1982-2008 were identified in the national cancer registries. Five-year survivors and matched population comparisons without childhood cancer were followed for hospitalization for 120 somatic disease categories in the national hospital registries from 5 years postdiagnosis until 2017, and disease-specific hospitalization rate ratios (RR) were calculated. The mean cumulative count method was used to estimate the mean number of multiple and recurrent disease-specific hospitalizations per individual. RESULTS: A total of 2024 5-year survivors and 9797 population comparisons were included. The overall hospitalization rate was more than twice as high compared with comparisons (RR = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.09 to 2.52). At 30 years postdiagnosis, the mean cumulative hospitalization count was 1.69 (95% CI = 1.47 to 1.90) per survivor and 0.80 (95% CI = 0.73 to 0.86) per comparison. In the subcohort without relapse or HSCT (n = 1709), the RR was 1.41 (95% CI = 1.27 to 1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of childhood ALL were at increased long-term risk for disease-specific hospitalizations; however, in survivors without relapse or HSCT, the rate was only modestly higher than in population comparisons without a childhood cancer. The absolute mean numbers of multiple and recurrent hospitalizations were generally low.
Subject(s)
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Survivors , Adult , Cohort Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology , Recurrence , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies on the risk of new primary cancer in patients with posterior uveal melanoma (UM) have produced conflicting results, and the role of socioeconomic status (SES) is unknown. The purpose of this population-based matched cohort study was to determine the risk of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM. METHODS: 2179 patients with posterior UM 1968-2016 and 22,717 matched controls without cancer were included. Incidence and time-dependent hazard ratio (HR) of new primary cancer were described, and the effect of SES was emphasized in a sub-cohort. RESULTS: The incidence of new primary cancer was increased in patients with posterior UM, rate ratio (RR) 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08; 1.35), but the specific cancer types did not differ compared to the controls. The rate of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM was significantly increased 2-5 years (HR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23; 1.80)) and 11-15 years (HR: 1.49 (95% CI: 1.12; 1.99)), and adjusting for SES did not change the rate (HR 1.35 (95% CI:1.20; 1.55)). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with posterior UM have an increased risk of new primary cancer independent of SES. No difference in incidence of specific cancer type was observed compared to the control group.
ABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: Do fertility drugs increase the risk of thyroid cancer among infertile women? SUMMARY ANSWER: The use of most types of fertility drugs was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The incidence of thyroid cancer is higher for women than men, especially during reproductive years, indicating that reproductive hormones may be involved in the development of thyroid cancer. Only a few previous studies have examined the association between the use of fertility drugs and incidence of thyroid cancer and the results are inconclusive. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective, population-based cohort study including all 146 024 infertile women aged 20-45 years and living in Denmark in the period 1995-2017. The women were followed from the date of entry in the cohort (i.e. date of first infertility diagnosis) until the occurrence of thyroid cancer or any other cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer), death, emigration, total thyroidectomy or the end of follow-up (31 December 2018), whichever occurred first. The median length of follow-up was 11.3 years. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In total, 167 women were diagnosed with thyroid cancer during the follow-up period. Information on the use of specific fertility drugs (clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, hCGs, GnRH receptor modulators and progesterone), thyroid cancer, covariates and vital status was obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and various Danish national registers. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for thyroid cancer overall and for papillary thyroid cancer. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After adjustment for the calendar year of infertility diagnosis, the highest obtained level of education, parity status, obesity or thyroid disease and mutual adjustment for other registered fertility drugs, no marked associations were observed between the use of clomiphene citrate, hCG, gonadotropins or GnRH receptor modulators and risk of overall or papillary thyroid cancer. However, ever use of progesterone was associated with an increased rate of both overall (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.07-2.48) and papillary (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.04-2.65) thyroid cancer after mutual adjustment for other specific fertility drugs. For most specific fertility drugs, we observed a tendency toward higher associations with thyroid cancer within the first 5 years after the start of drug use than after 5 years from the start of use. No marked associations were detected according to the cumulative dose for any of the specific fertility drugs. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite a large study population, the statistical precision in some subgroup analyses may be affected due to the low number of thyroid cancer cases. Although we were able to adjust for a number of potential confounders, residual and unmeasured confounding may potentially have affected the observed associations, as we could not adjust for some factors that may influence the association between fertility drugs and thyroid cancer, including age at menarche and BMI. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although this study, which is the largest to date, provides reassuring evidence that there is no strong link between the use of fertility drugs and thyroid cancer incidence, we observed a modest increased thyroid cancer incidence after the use of progesterone. However, we cannot rule out that this is a chance finding and the potential association between the use of progesterone and thyroid cancer should therefore be investigated further in large epidemiological studies. The results of the present study provide valuable knowledge for clinicians and other health care personnel involved in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was supported by research grants from the Jascha Foundation and the Aase and Ejner Danielsens Foundation. B.N. received honoraria and/or non-financial support by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, IBSA Nordic APS and Merck KGAA. The remaining authors have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Subject(s)
Fertility Agents , Infertility, Female , Thyroid Neoplasms , Adult , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Fertility Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Incidence , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/chemically induced , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Investigate all-cause and cause-specific late mortality after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a population-based Nordic cohort. METHODS: From the cancer registries of Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, we identified 3765 five-year survivors of ALL, diagnosed before age 20 during 1971-2008. For each survivor, up to five matched comparison subjects were randomly selected from the general population (n = 18,323). Causes of death were classified as relapse related, health related, and external. Late mortality was evaluated by cumulative incidences of death from 5-year survival date. Mortality hazard ratios (HR) were evaluated with Cox proportional models. RESULTS: Among the survivors, 315 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 16 years from 5-year survival date (range 0-42). The majority were attributable to relapse (n = 224), followed by second neoplasm (n = 45). Cumulative incidence of all-cause late mortality at 15 years from diagnosis decreased gradually over treatment decades, from 14.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.6-17.2) for survivors diagnosed during 1971-1981, to 2.5% (95% CI: 1.3-3.7) for those diagnosed during 2002-2008. This was mainly attributable to a reduction in relapse-related deaths decreasing from 13.4% (95% CI: 10.7-16.1) for survivors diagnosed during 1971-1981 to 1.9% (95% CI: 0.9-2.8) for those diagnosed during 2002-2008. Health-related late mortality was low and did not change substantially across treatment decades. Compared to comparison subjects, all-cause mortality HR was 40 (95% CI: 26-61) 5-9 years from diagnosis, and 4.4 (95% CI: 3.4-5.6) ≥10 years from diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of ALL have higher late mortality than population comparison subjects. Among the survivors, there was a temporal reduction in risk of death from relapse, without increments in health-related death.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adult , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Overtreatment , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/mortality , Sweden/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Hormonal changes related to pregnancy and lactation among women treated for cancer might influence the risk of second primary cancer. We investigated whether pregnancy near the time of breast cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma or other cancer diagnoses is associated with increased risk of developing a new primary cancer. METHODS: Women born after 1 April 1935 diagnosed with cancer at ages 15-44 years during 1968-2006 were identified in the Danish Cancer Registry. Information about pregnancies from various nationwide registers was used to identify women with a pregnancy-associated cancer defined as a cancer diagnosed 6 or fewer months before the pregnancy, during the pregnancy or up to 1 year after the pregnancy. Second primary cancers were ascertained through 2013, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression models adjusted for age, calendar-period and number of pregnancies with the reference defined as cancer not associated with a pregnancy. RESULTS: We identified 2,974 women with pregnancy-associated cancer and 31,970 women who were not pregnant near the time of their cancer diagnosis. There was no association between pregnancy-associated cancer and a second cancer (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.79-1.05). Among 680 women with either breast cancer or Hodgkin lymphoma associated with pregnancy, a HR of 1.16 (95% CI 0.87-1.56) for second breast cancer was observed based on 48 cases. CONCLUSION: While hormonal changes might stimulate development of specific cancers, in particular breast cancer, it is reassuring that risk of breast and other second cancers was not related to pregnancy near the time of a first primary cancer diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Adolescent , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lactation , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patients with prostate cancer (PC) who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) experience impaired sexual and urinary function. AIM: To compare the effect of early couple counseling and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with usual care for sexual and urinary dysfunction after RP. METHODS: The ProCan study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel treatment arms and 1:1 allocation. Between January 2016 and December 2017, candidates for RP were invited to a longitudinal questionnaire study and provided baseline measures before surgery. Patients who underwent RP, had a female partner, and were sexually active were invited to the ProCan RCT. Couples who provided informed consent were allocated to usual care or usual care and up to six couple counseling sessions, up to three instructions in PFMT and a video home-training program. All couples filled in follow-up questionnaires at 8 and 12 months and non-participants provided 12 months' follow-up. Linear mixed-effect models and 95% confidence intervals were used to measure effects of the intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome was erectile function, measured with The International Index of Erectile Function, at 8 and 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were sexual and urinary function and use of treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) by patients; sexual function in female partners; and relationship function, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy in both patients and female partners. RESULTS: Thirty-five couples were randomized. No significant effect of the intervention was found on erectile function at 8 months (estimated difference in change, 1.41; 95% CI; -5.51 ; 8.33) or 12 months (estimated difference in change, 0.53; 95% CI; -5.94; 6.99) or in secondary outcomes, except for significantly increased use of ED treatment at 8 months. CONCLUSION: We found no effect of early couple counseling and PFMT, possibly because of the limited number of participants. Karlsen RV, Bidstrup PE, Giraldi A, et al. Couple Counseling and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Men Operated for Prostate Cancer and for Their Female Partners. Results From the Randomized ProCan Trial. Sex Med 2021;9:100350.
ABSTRACT
We investigated the risk of depression in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and associated risk factors. The 1324 patients with CRC and 6620 matched cancer-free participants from the Diet, Cancer and Health study were followed for up to 16 years for either a first hospitalization for depression or antidepressant prescription after diagnosis of CRC cancer or study entry date. Information on the outcome and covariates was retrieved from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, the national health registries and questionnaires. Cumulative incidence of depression was estimated, and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between risk factors and depression incidence. During follow-up, 191 (14.4%) patients with CRC and 175 (2.6%) cancer-free comparison persons experienced depression. After adjustments, in the first year after cancer diagnosis, patients with CRC had a 12-fold higher hazard compared with the cancer-free population (HR, 12.01; 95% CI, 7.89-18.28). The risk decreased during follow-up but remained significantly elevated with an HR of 2.65 (95% CI, 1.61-4.36) after five years. Identified risk factors were presence of comorbidities, advanced disease stage and use of radiotherapy, while life style factors (pre-cancer or at diagnosis) and chemotherapy did not seem to contribute to the increased risk.
ABSTRACT
There is limited information addressing the occurrence of esophageal strictures among the growing population of survivors of childhood cancer. Using the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we analyzed data from 17,121 5-year survivors and 3400 siblings to determine the prevalence and risk factors for esophageal strictures. Prevalence among survivors was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-2.2%), representing a 7.6-fold increased risk compared to siblings. Factors significantly associated with risk of esophageal stricture included diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma, greater chest radiation dose, younger age at cancer diagnosis, platinum chemotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While uncommon, survivors are at risk for therapy-related esophageal strictures.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Esophageal Diseases/epidemiology , Hodgkin Disease , Neoplasms , Child , Constriction, Pathologic , Hodgkin Disease/epidemiology , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Risk Factors , SurvivorsABSTRACT
Fertility drugs have not definitively been linked to malignant melanoma. By the use of data from a large nationwide cohort of women aged 20.0-45.0 years and living in Denmark between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2011, we assessed the association between the use of fertility drugs and the risk of malignant melanoma. Information on fertility status and the use of fertility drugs was obtained from the population-based Danish Infertility Cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals with adjustment for potential confounders. The study population comprised 1,330,954 women, of whom 86,231 (6.5%) were treated with fertility drugs. During a median follow-up of 21.0 years, 6,139 women were diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Compared with fertile women, women with fertility challenges who had used any fertility drugs had an increased risk of malignant melanoma (hazard ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.27). Furthermore, the use of specific types of fertility drugs (clomiphene, gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone preparations, and progesterone) was also associated with an increased risk of malignant melanoma, with hazard ratios ranging between 1.09 and 1.13; however, the association did not reach statistical significance. Our findings indicate that the use of fertility drugs was associated with a modestly increased risk of malignant melanoma.
Subject(s)
Fertility Agents/therapeutic use , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Melanoma/diagnosis , Population Groups , Adult , Clomiphene/adverse effects , Clomiphene/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Fertility Agents/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Risk , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With modern therapy, over 90% of Wilms tumor patients can expect to become long-term survivors, and focus on morbidity and late effects become increasingly important. We provide a novel evaluation and insight to subsequent hospitalizations in 5-year survivors of Wilms tumor. METHODS: As part of the Adult Life after Childhood Cancer in Scandinavia (ALiCCS) study, we identified 5-year survivors of Wilms tumor. Based on stratified random sampling, we constructed a population comparison cohort. Outcomes of interest were overall hospitalizations; hospitalizations for specific organ systems and disease-specific categories. Standardized hospitalization rate ratios (SHRR) and absolute excess risks (AER) were calculated. RESULTS: We included 913, 5-year survivors of Wilms tumor and 152 231 population comparisons. Survivors of Wilms tumor had an increased overall risk of being hospitalized (SHRR 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-2.0). The hospitalization risk was increased within all major organ systems: urinary and genital organs (SHRR 2.5; 95% CI 2.1-3.0), endocrine (SHRR 2.5; 95% CI 1.9-3.3), cardiovascular (SHRR 2.2; 95% CI 1.7-2.9), and gastrointestinal (SHRR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.8). Risks for specific diseases are reported in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of Wilms tumor had higher risks than population comparisons for a wide range of diseases, with the highest risks seen for urinary, endocrine, and cardiovascular disorders. Five to 20 years after the Wilms tumor diagnosis, 43% of survivors had been hospitalized at least once versus 29% of population comparisons. The overall AER was 2.3, which translates into 0.2 extra hospitalizations in 10 years for every Wilms tumor survivor.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Neoplasms/complications , Wilms Tumor/complications , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Using data from a large population-based cohort of women with fertility problems in Denmark, we examined the association between use of fertility drugs and endometrial cancer incidence. METHODS: Women aged 20-45 years living in Denmark during 1 January 1995-31 December 2017 and diagnosed with fertility problems (i.e., subfertile women) were identified from the Danish Infertility Cohort. Information on use of fertility drugs, endometrial cancer, covariates and vital status was obtained from various Danish national registers. Cox proportional hazard models were used adjusted for calendar year of study entry, highest level of education, parity status, hormonal contraceptive use, obesity and diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: Of the 146,104 subfertile women, 129,478 (88.6%) were treated with fertility drugs. During a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 119 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Use of any fertility drugs was not associated with an increased rate of overall (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.50-1.34) or type I endometrial cancer (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.60-1.95). No associations between use of specific types of fertility drugs and endometrial cancer were observed. No marked associations were observed according to cumulative dose of specific fertility drugs, parity status, or with increasing follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: No marked associations between use of fertility drugs and risk of endometrial cancer were observed. The relatively young age of the cohort at end of follow-up, however, highlights the need for longer follow-up of women after fertility drug use.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Adult , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , RiskABSTRACT
Large, comprehensive studies of the risk for neurologic disorders among long-term survivors of noncentral nervous system (CNS) childhood cancers are lacking. Thus, the aim of our study was to assess the lifetime risk of Nordic non-CNS childhood cancer survivors for neurologic disorders. We identified 15,967 5-year survivors of non-CNS childhood cancer diagnosed in Denmark, Iceland, Finland and Sweden in 1943-2008, and 151,118 matched population comparison subjects. In-patient discharge diagnoses of neurologic disorders were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs). A neurologic disorder was diagnosed in 755 of the survivors while 370 were expected, yielding a RR of 2.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-2.2). The highest risks were found among survivors of neuroblastoma (4.1; 95% CI 3.2-5.3) and leukemia (2.8; 95% CI 2.4-3.2). The AER decreased from 331 (278-383) excess neurologic disorders per 100,000 person-years 5-9 years after diagnosis to 82 (46-118) ≥ 20 years after diagnosis. Epilepsy was the most common diagnosis (n = 229, 1.4% of all survivors), and significantly increased risks were seen among survivors of eight out of 12 types of childhood cancer. Survivors of neuroblastoma had remarkably high risks (RR ≥ 10) for hospitalization for paralytic syndromes and hydrocephalus, while survivors of leukemia had additional high risks for dementia and encephalopathy. In conclusion, survivors of non-CNS childhood cancer are at high risk for neurologic disorders, especially within the first decade after diagnosis. Therefore, intensive follow-up to identify those who require close management is needed.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Nervous System Neoplasms/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Nervous System Neoplasms/mortality , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Most cancer survivors receive follow-up care after completion of treatment with the primary aim of detecting recurrence. Traditional follow-up consisting of fixed visits to a cancer specialist for examinations and tests are expensive and may be burdensome for the patient. Follow-up strategies involving non-specialist care providers, different intensity of procedures, or addition of survivorship care packages have been developed and tested, however their effectiveness remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to compare the effect of different follow-up strategies in adult cancer survivors, following completion of primary cancer treatment, on the primary outcomes of overall survival and time to detection of recurrence. Secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life, anxiety (including fear of recurrence), depression and cost. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases and two trials registries on 11 December 2018 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised trials comparing different follow-up strategies for adult cancer survivors following completion of curatively-intended primary cancer treatment, which included at least one of the outcomes listed above. We compared the effectiveness of: 1) non-specialist-led follow-up (i.e. general practitioner (GP)-led, nurse-led, patient-initiated or shared care) versus specialist-led follow-up; 2) less intensive versus more intensive follow-up (based on clinical visits, examinations and diagnostic procedures) and 3) follow-up integrating additional care components relevant for detection of recurrence (e.g. patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans) versus usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological guidelines by Cochrane and Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. For each comparison, we present synthesised findings for overall survival and time to detection of recurrence as hazard ratios (HR) and for health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression as mean differences (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). When meta-analysis was not possible, we reported the results from individual studies. For survival and recurrence, we used meta-regression analysis where possible to investigate whether the effects varied with regards to cancer site, publication year and study quality. MAIN RESULTS: We included 53 trials involving 20,832 participants across 12 cancer sites and 15 countries, mainly in Europe, North America and Australia. All the studies were carried out in either a hospital or general practice setting. Seventeen studies compared non-specialist-led follow-up with specialist-led follow-up, 24 studies compared intensity of follow-up and 12 studies compared patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans with usual care. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear in most of the studies, with a higher risk of bias in the smaller trials. Non-specialist-led follow-up compared with specialist-led follow-up It is uncertain how this strategy affects overall survival (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.15; 2 studies; 603 participants), time to detection of recurrence (4 studies, 1691 participants) or cost (8 studies, 1756 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Non-specialist- versus specialist-led follow up may make little or no difference to health-related quality of life at 12 months (MD 1.06, 95% CI -1.83 to 3.95; 4 studies; 605 participants; low-certainty evidence); and probably makes little or no difference to anxiety at 12 months (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.73 to 0.67; 5 studies; 1266 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We are more certain that it has little or no effect on depression at 12 months (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.42; 5 studies; 1266 participants; high-certainty evidence). Less intensive follow-up compared with more intensive follow-up Less intensive versus more intensive follow-up may make little or no difference to overall survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.14; 13 studies; 10,726 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably increases time to detection of recurrence (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.92; 12 studies; 11,276 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-regression analysis showed little or no difference in the intervention effects by cancer site, publication year or study quality. It is uncertain whether this strategy has an effect on health-related quality of life (3 studies, 2742 participants), anxiety (1 study, 180 participants) or cost (6 studies, 1412 participants) because the certainty of evidence is very low. None of the studies reported on depression. Follow-up strategies integrating additional patient symptom education or monitoring, or survivorship care plans compared with usual care: None of the studies reported on overall survival or time to detection of recurrence. It is uncertain whether this strategy makes a difference to health-related quality of life (12 studies, 2846 participants), anxiety (1 study, 470 participants), depression (8 studies, 2351 participants) or cost (1 studies, 408 participants), as the certainty of evidence is very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of the different follow-up strategies varies substantially. Less intensive follow-up may make little or no difference to overall survival but probably delays detection of recurrence. However, as we did not analyse the two outcomes together, we cannot make direct conclusions about the effect of interventions on survival after detection of recurrence. The effects of non-specialist-led follow-up on survival and detection of recurrence, and how intensity of follow-up affects health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, are uncertain. There was little evidence for the effects of follow-up integrating additional patient symptom education/monitoring and survivorship care plans.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Patient Satisfaction , Anxiety/rehabilitation , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Continuity of Patient Care , Depression/rehabilitation , Fatigue/rehabilitation , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Using a nationwide cohort of Danish women, we investigated the association between use of fertility drugs and risk of breast cancer. METHODS: The study cohort included women ages 20 to 44 years and living in Denmark between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2011. Information on fertility status, use of fertility drugs, breast cancer, covariates, and vital status was obtained from the Danish Infertility Cohort and various Danish national registers. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 1,330,852 women included, 96,782 (7.3%) were infertile, and 20,567 (1.5%) were diagnosed with breast cancer during a median follow-up of 20.9 years. Compared with fertile women, infertile women who had used any fertility drugs did not have an increased hazard for breast cancer overall (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10), or for any of the histologic types (ductal, lobular, or mucinous) of breast cancer. Furthermore, no associations were observed between use of specific types of fertility drugs and breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: No convincing associations between use of fertility drugs and breast cancer were observed after two decades of follow-up. IMPACT: Our results do not support a marked association between fertility drugs and breast cancer and are therefore reassuring for infertile women treated with fertility drugs.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Fertility Agents/adverse effects , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Young AdultSubject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Penile Neoplasms , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 , DNA , Humans , Male , PrevalenceABSTRACT
We estimated the overall and type-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 overexpression in vaginal cancer and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN). We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library to identify studies published between 1986 and 2017 using PCR-based or Hybrid Capture 2 tests to evaluate the presence of HPV DNA and/or using any method to detect p16 overexpression in VaIN, vaginal squamous cell carcinoma (VaSCC), or other types of vaginal cancer. Applying a random effects model, we estimated the pooled prevalence of HPV and p16 overexpression along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. We included 26 studies, reporting HPV prevalence and six studies evaluating p16 overexpression. The pooled HPV prevalences in VaSCC (n = 593) and VaIN (n = 1,374) were 66.7% (95% CI = 54.7-77.8) and 85.2% (95% CI = 78.2-91.0), respectively. Substantial inter-study heterogeneity was observed, and analyses stratified on geographic region, type of tissue, HPV detection method or PCR primer type did not fully explain the observed heterogeneity. The most predominant HPV type among the HPV positive VaSCC and VaIN cases was HPV16, followed by HPV33, and HPV45 (in VaIN) and HPV18, and HPV33 (in VaSCC). In pooled analyses, 89.9% (95% CI = 81.7-94.6) of HPV positive and 38.9% (95% CI = 0.9-90.0) of HPV negative vaginal cancers were positive for p16 overexpression. Our findings suggest that vaccination against HPV might prevent a substantial proportion of vaginal neoplasia and highlight the need for further studies of the possible clinical value of p16 testing in these patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma in Situ/virology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/biosynthesis , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Vaginal Neoplasms/virology , Carcinoma in Situ/metabolism , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Grading , Papillomavirus Infections/metabolism , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Prevalence , Vaginal Neoplasms/metabolism , Vaginal Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although previous meta-analyses have examined human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA prevalence in penile cancer, none, to our knowledge, have assessed pooled HPV DNA prevalence in penile intraepithelial neoplasia or p16INK4a percent positivity in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Therefore, we aimed to examine the prevalence of HPV DNA and p16INK4a positivity in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia worldwide. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until July 24, 2017, for English-language articles published from Jan 1, 1986, onwards reporting the prevalence of HPV DNA and p16INK4a positivity, either alone or in combination, in at least five cases of penile cancer or penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Only studies that used PCR or hybrid capture for the detection of HPV DNA and immunohistochemical staining or methylation for the detection of p16INK4a were included. Data were extracted and subsequently crosschecked, and inconsistencies were discussed to reach consensus. Using random-effects models, we estimated the pooled prevalence and 95% CI of HPV DNA and p16INK4a positivity in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia, stratifying by histological subtype and HPV DNA or p16INK4a detection method. Type-specific prevalence of HPV6, HPV11, HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, HPV33, and HPV45 in penile cancer was estimated. FINDINGS: Our searches identified 1836 non-duplicate records, of which 73 relevant papers (71 studies) were found to be eligible. The pooled HPV DNA prevalence in penile cancer (52 studies; n=4199) was 50·8% (95% CI 44·8-56·7; I2=92·6%, pheterogeneity<0·0001). A high pooled HPV DNA prevalence was seen in basaloid squamous cell carcinomas (84·0%, 95% CI 71·0-93·6; I2=48·0%, pheterogeneity=0·0197) and in warty-basaloid carcinoma (75·7%, 70·1-81·0; I2=0%, pheterogeneity=0·52). The predominant oncogenic HPV type in penile cancer was HPV16 (68·3%, 95% CI 58·9-77·1), followed by HPV6 (8·1%, 4·0-13·7) and HPV18 (6·9%, 2·9-12·4). The pooled HPV DNA prevalence in penile intraepithelial neoplasia (19 studies; n=445) was 79·8% (95% CI 69·3-88·6; I2=83·2%, pheterogeneity<0·0001). The pooled p16INK4a percent positivity in penile cancer (24 studies; n=2295) was 41·6% (95% CI 36·2-47·0; I2=80·6%, pheterogeneity<0·0001), with a high pooled p16INK4a percent positivity in HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma (85·8%, 95% CI 72·1-95·4; I2=56·4%, pheterogeneity=0·0011) as compared with non-HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma (17·1%, 7·9-29·1; I2=78·3%, pheterogeneity<0·0001). Moreover, among HPV-positive cases of penile cancer, the p16INK4a percent positivity was 79·6% (95% CI 65·7-90·7; I2=89·9%, pheterogeneity<0·0001), compared with 18·5% (9·6-29·6; I2=89·3%, pheterogeneity<0·0001) in HPV-negative penile cancers. The pooled p16INK4a percent positivity in penile intraepithelial neoplasia (six studies; n=167) was 49·5% (95% CI 18·6-80·7). INTERPRETATION: A large proportion of penile cancers and penile intraepithelial neoplasias are associated with infection with HPV DNA (predominantly HPV16), emphasising the possible benefits of HPV vaccination in men and boys. FUNDING: None.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/metabolism , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Penile Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/virology , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Humans , Male , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Penile Neoplasms/pathology , Penile Neoplasms/virology , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Background: A comprehensive overview of neurologic complications among survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in childhood is lacking. We aimed to investigate the risk for these disorders in a large, population-based study with outcome measures from nationwide hospital registries. Methods: We identified 4858 five-year survivors with diagnoses of CNS tumor in childhood in Denmark, Iceland, Finland, and Sweden in 1943-2007, and 166658 matched population comparison subjects. Inpatient discharge diagnoses of neurologic disorders were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs). Results: A neurologic disorder was verified in 1309 survivors, while 92.4 were expected, yielding an overall RR of 14.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.3-15.1) and an AER of 20 hospitalizations per 1000 persons per year. The risks remained increased more than 20 years after diagnosis (RR: 6.3, 95% CI: 5.6-7.2; AER: 11, 9-12). The most frequent diagnoses were epilepsy (affecting 14.1% of all survivors) followed by hydrocephalus (9.5%) and paralytic syndromes (4.2%), with RRs of 28.7 (95% CI: 26.0-31.6), 243 (95% CI: 190-311), and 40.3 (95% CI: 33.1-49.2), respectively. Of these outcomes, 30%-40% were diagnosed prior to or synchronously with the CNS tumor. The survivors had highly increased RRs for infectious diseases of the CNS, disorders of cranial nerves, and degenerative diseases of the nervous system. Conclusions: Survivors of childhood CNS tumors are at markedly increased risk for neurologic disorders throughout their lives. Health care professionals must be aware of survivors who might benefit from preventive interventions and intensive follow-up.