Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 42(3): 159-167, 2018 Apr.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28736085

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: An analysis is made of the clinical profile, evolution and differences in morbidity and mortality of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery, according to the 3 diagnostic subgroups defined by the SEMICYUC Consensus 2012. DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective cohort study was carried out. SETTING: ICUs of Spanish hospitals with cardiac surgery. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 2,070 cardiac surgery patients was included, with the analysis of 137 patients with LCOS. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention was carried out. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 68.3±9.3 years (65.2% males), with a EuroSCORE II of 9.99±13. NYHA functional class III-IV (52.9%), left ventricular ejection fraction<35% (33.6%), AMI (31.9%), severe PHT (21.7%), critical preoperative condition (18.8%), prior cardiac surgery (18.1%), PTCA/stent placement (16.7%). According to subgroups, 46 patients fulfilled hemodynamic criteria of LCOS (group A), 50 clinical criteria (group B), and the rest (n=41) presented cardiogenic shock (group C). Significant differences were observed over the evolutive course between the subgroups in terms of time subjected to mechanical ventilation (114.4, 135.4 and 180.3min in groups A, B and C, respectively; P<.001), renal replacement requirements (11.4, 14.6 and 36.6%; P=.007), multiorgan failure (16.7, 13 and 47.5%), and mortality (13.6, 12.5 and 35.9%; P=.01). The mean maximum lactate concentration was higher in cardiogenic shock patients (P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical evolution of these patients leads to high morbidity and mortality. We found differences between the subgroups in terms of the postoperative clinical course and mortality.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output, Low/etiology , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Output, Low/blood , Cardiac Output, Low/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Lactates/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Oliguria/epidemiology , Oliguria/etiology , Oxygen/blood , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/blood , Shock, Cardiogenic/epidemiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Spain/epidemiology
2.
Med Intensiva ; 41(5): 285-305, 2017.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476212

ABSTRACT

The standardization of the Intensive Care Medicine may improve the management of the adult critically ill patient. However, these strategies have not been widely applied in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs). The aim is to elaborate the recommendations for the standardization of the treatment of critical patients. A panel of experts from the thirteen working groups (WG) of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) was selected and nominated by virtue of clinical expertise and/or scientific experience to carry out the recommendations. Available scientific literature in the management of adult critically ill patients from 2002 to 2016 was extracted. The clinical evidence was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus finding of every WG and finally approved by the WGs after an extensive internal review process that was carried out between December 2015 and December 2016. A total of 65 recommendations were developed, of which 5 corresponded to each of the 13 WGs. These recommendations are based on the opinion of experts and scientific knowledge, and are intended as a guide for the intensivists in the management of critical patients.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Critical Care/methods , Critical Illness/therapy , Decision Making , Disease Management , Humans , Intensive Care Units/standards , Life Support Care/standards , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Palliative Care , Patient Care Team , Registries , Societies, Medical , Spain , Terminal Care/standards , Truth Disclosure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...