Linking Primary Care Patients to Mental Health Care via Behavioral Health Social Workers: A Stepped-Wedge Study.

OBJECTIVE: Demand for systematic linkage of patients to behavioral health care has increased because of the widespread implementation of depression screening. This study assessed the impact of deploying behavioral health social workers (BHSWs) in primary care on behavioral health visits for depression or anxiety. METHODS: This quasi-experimental, stepped-wedge study included adults with a primary care visit between 2016 and 2019 at Cleveland Clinic, a large integrated health system. BHSWs were deployed in 40 practices between 2017 and 2019. Patients were allocated to a control group (diagnosed before BHSW deployment) and an intervention group (diagnosed after deployment). Data were collected on behavioral health visits (i.e., to therapists and psychiatrists) within 30 days of the diagnosis. Multilevel logistic regression models identified associations between BHSW deployment period and behavioral health visit, adjusted for demographic variables and clustering within each group. RESULTS: Of 68,659 persons with a diagnosis, 21% had a depression diagnosis, 49% an anxiety diagnosis, and 31% both diagnoses. In the period after BHSW deployment, the proportion of patients with depression who had a behavioral health visit increased by 10 percentage points, of patients with anxiety by 9 percentage points, and of patients with both disorders by 11 percentage points. The adjusted odds of having a behavioral health visit was higher in the postdeployment period for patients with depression (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.50-5.41), anxiety (AOR=4.27, 95% CI=3.57-5.11), and both (AOR= 3.26, 95% CI=2.77-3.84). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of BHSWs in primary care was associated with increased behavioral health visits.

Pilot evaluation of a substance abuse prevention group intervention for at-risk bariatric surgery candidates.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about an increased incidence of substance abuse after bariatric surgery. Alcohol use after surgery may be particularly problematic because of changes in pharmacokinetics leading to greater intoxication. The present study evaluated a substance abuse prevention group pilot intervention for at-risk bariatric surgery candidates. METHODS: Patients with a history of substance abuse/dependence or at-risk substance use applying for weight loss surgery (WLS; N = 86) were referred to a single-session 90-minute intervention (67.4% female; 65.1% Caucasian; mean age 46.2 years; mean body mass index 48.77 kg/m(2)). The session included education about the health effects of alcohol/substances on WLS outcomes, developing alternative coping strategies, identifying warning signs of misuse, and providing treatment resources. Patients completed a preintervention and postintervention questionnaire measuring knowledge of substance use health effects, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption Items, and items on motivation for abstinence. RESULTS: Patients reported a significant increase in knowledge regarding the negative effects of substance abuse after surgery (t = 42.34; P<.001). Patients also reported more healthy alternative coping strategies after the intervention (t = 18.96; P<.001). In addition, a significant number of patients reported a lower intention of consuming alcohol after surgery (χ(2) = 16.18; P<.001) and were more likely to report health reasons as motivation to abstain (χ(2) = 102.89; P< .001). CONCLUSIONS: At-risk patients applying for weight loss surgery may benefit from a substance abuse prevention intervention. More research will be needed to see if such benefits can be sustained over time and if interventions affect postsurgical behaviors.