ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Conventional creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations have been reported to overestimate renal function in patients with cirrhosis. The Royal Free Hospital (RFH) cirrhosis GFR equation was developed to accurately estimate GFR in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of widely available equations [Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations (MDRD-4, MDRD-6)] and the RFH equation to correctly estimate the GFR of patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with cirrhosis who underwent measurement of GFR with the use of 51Cr-EDTA (GFR-M). The CKD-EPI, MDRD-4, MDRD-6 and RFH equations were calculated, while bias, precision and accuracy were estimated for each one of them and then compared with paired t-tests. Bias was defined as the mean difference between the GFR-M and the result of each equation; precision was defined as the SD of the differences and accuracy was defined as the square root of the mean squared error (mean of the squared differences). Higher values are associated with worse bias and better precision/accuracy. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-four cirrhotic patients were included. Bias was estimated for CKD-EPI, MDRD-4, MDRD-6 and RFH at -5.91, -3.13, 0.92 and 18.24, respectively. Significant differences were observed between all equations (P < 0.001). Regarding precision, only the comparison between MDRD-4 (20.81) and RFH (16.6) yielded a statistically significant result (P = 0.037). Finally, CKD-EPI (19.32) and MDRD-6 (18.81) exhibited better accuracy than GFR-RFH (24.61) (P = 0.006 and 0.001). CONCLUSION: RFH demonstrates inferior accuracy in predicting renal function in patients with cirrhosis, in comparison to conventional equations.
Subject(s)
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Creatinine , Fibrosis , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Hospitals , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Bilious pleural effusion or cholethorax is a rare type of exudative pleural effusion. Here is presented a case of right-sided cholethorax, in which the direct communication between the pleural effusion with the biliary duct was visible only on the posteriori images of dynamic hepatobiliary scintigraphy with [99mTc]mebrofenin.
Subject(s)
Communication , Liver , Humans , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Radionuclide ImagingABSTRACT
The role of 18F-FDG PET in patients with variable grades of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has not been adequately elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of 18F-FDG PET status on disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients receiving PRRT. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to July 2020 and used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) criteria to assess quality/risk of bias. A total of 5091 articles were screened. In 12 studies, 1492 unique patients with NETs of different origins were included. The DCR for patients with negative 18F-FDG PET status prior to PRRT initiation was 91.9%, compared to 74.2% in patients with positive 18F-FDG PET status (random effects odds ratio (OR): 4.85; 95% CI: 2.27-10.36). Adjusted analysis of pooled hazard ratios (HRs) confirmed longer PFS and OS in NET patients receiving PRRT with negative 18F-FDG PET (random effects HR:2.45; 95%CIs: 1.48-4.04 and HR:2.25; 95% CIs:1.55-3.28, respectively). In conclusion, 18F-FDG PET imaging prior to PRRT administration appears to be a useful tool in NET patients to predict tumor response and survival outcomes and a negative FDG uptake of the tumor is associated with prolonged PFS and OS.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of (99m)Tc-HMPAO-labeled white blood cells scintigraphy (RL-WBC scan) in a variety of infectious processes. Despite the technical difficulties of labeling WBCs without altering their viability/pathophysiologic integrity and the lengthy imaging procedure, the RL-WBC scan has gained an evolving role in the detection of occult infection. METHODS: Retrospective review of 66 patient files (34 males and 32 females) that underwent this functional imaging test from September 2013 until September 2015. Their mean age was 58.39±18.63 (range: 11-84) years. Twenty seven of them were investigated for fever of unknown origin, 6 with suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease, 9 with aneurysm of celiac artery before or after abdominal endovascular aortic repair, 6 with joint prostheses, 5 with diabetic angiopathy, and 13 had rather undefined symptoms. RESULTS: The mean labeling yield of the leukocytes with the lipophilic complex (99m)Tc-HMPAO was 57.4±8.6. The RL-WBC scan was positive in 39/66 patients, including 16/27 patients with fever of unknown origin and 8/9 patients with aortic aneurysm/graft infection. It showed expected/suspected localization of radioactivity in 23 patients, whereas 11 of them had equivocal signs of infection. In 16 patients, a significant change in patients' management was conferred, as non-suspected locations of inflammatory process were detected, based on early functional alterations derived from leukocyte recruitment. CONCLUSION: The RL-WBC scan (i) is extremely useful in the diagnosis of perigraft tissue infection and osteomyelitis (except for spine) with high rate of sensitivity and specificity (≈90%) when timely used, and (ii) may provide valuable information in patients with fever of unknown origin, inflammatory bowel disease or vague symptoms. False positive results have been noticed mainly due to artifacts, co-existent skeletal lesions or in the early postoperative course because of the nonspecific radionuclide uptake in the healing tissue. On the other hand, false negative results may appear in delayed aortic graft infection, etc. Difficulties arise in the discrimination between infection and sterile inflammatory lesions accompanying atheromatosis or grafts/prostheses. Our experience shows that there should take place a closer co-operation between nuclear medicine physicians and clinicians to ensure the rational selection of the patients that would benefit from this complex diagnostic procedure, in order to get the optimal results concerning in vivo inflammation/abscess visualization.