Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Pharmacol ; 181(11): 1553-1575, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519837

ABSTRACT

In 2023, seventy novel drugs received market authorization for the first time in either Europe (by the EMA and the MHRA) or in the United States (by the FDA). Confirming a steady recent trend, more than half of these drugs target rare diseases or intractable forms of cancer. Thirty drugs are categorized as "first-in-class" (FIC), illustrating the quality of research and innovation that drives new chemical entity discovery and development. We succinctly describe the mechanism of action of most of these FIC drugs and discuss the therapeutic areas covered, as well as the chemical category to which these drugs belong. The 2023 novel drug list also demonstrates an unabated emphasis on polypeptides (recombinant proteins and antibodies), Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (gene and cell therapies) and RNA therapeutics, including the first-ever approval of a CRISPR-Cas9-based gene-editing cell therapy.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval , United States Food and Drug Administration , Humans , Europe , United States
3.
Br J Pharmacol ; 177(21): 4942-4966, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358833

ABSTRACT

In this review, we identify opportunities for drug discovery in the treatment of COVID-19 and, in so doing, provide a rational roadmap whereby pharmacology and pharmacologists can mitigate against the global pandemic. We assess the scope for targeting key host and viral targets in the mid-term, by first screening these targets against drugs already licensed, an agenda for drug repurposing, which should allow rapid translation to clinical trials. A simultaneous, multi-pronged approach using conventional drug discovery methods aimed at discovering novel chemical and biological means of targeting a short list of host and viral entities which should extend the arsenal of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. This longer term strategy would provide a deeper pool of drug choices for future-proofing against acquired drug resistance. Second, there will be further viral threats, which will inevitably evade existing vaccines. This will require a coherent therapeutic strategy which pharmacology and pharmacologists are best placed to provide. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The Pharmacology of COVID-19. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.21/issuetoc.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Animals , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Development , Drug Discovery , Drug Repositioning , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
7.
Hear Res ; 356: 51-62, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29108871

ABSTRACT

Cannabinoids have been suggested as a therapeutic target for a variety of brain disorders. Despite the presence of their receptors throughout the auditory system, little is known about how cannabinoids affect auditory function. We sought to determine whether administration of arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide (ACEA), a highly-selective CB1 agonist, could attenuate a variety of auditory effects caused by prior administration of salicylate, and potentially treat tinnitus. We recorded cortical resting-state activity, auditory-evoked cortical activity and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), from chronically-implanted awake guinea pigs, before and after salicylate + ACEA. Salicylate-induced reductions in click-evoked ABR amplitudes were smaller in the presence of ACEA, suggesting that the ototoxic effects of salicylate were less severe. ACEA also abolished salicylate-induced changes in cortical alpha band (6-10 Hz) oscillatory activity. However, salicylate-induced increases in cortical evoked activity (suggestive of the presence of hyperacusis) were still present with salicylate + ACEA. ACEA administered alone did not induce significant changes in either ABR amplitudes or oscillatory activity, but did increase cortical evoked potentials. Furthermore, in two separate groups of non-implanted animals, we found no evidence that ACEA could reverse behavioural identification of salicylate- or noise-induced tinnitus. Together, these data suggest that while ACEA may be potentially otoprotective, selective CB1 agonists are not effective in diminishing the presence of tinnitus or hyperacusis.


Subject(s)
Arachidonic Acids/pharmacology , Auditory Cortex/drug effects , Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Hyperacusis/prevention & control , Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/agonists , Salicylic Acid , Tinnitus/prevention & control , Acoustic Stimulation , Alpha Rhythm/drug effects , Animals , Auditory Cortex/metabolism , Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Cytoprotection , Disease Models, Animal , Electrocorticography , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/drug effects , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/drug effects , Female , Guinea Pigs , Hyperacusis/chemically induced , Hyperacusis/metabolism , Hyperacusis/physiopathology , Male , Noise , Reaction Time/drug effects , Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Time Factors , Tinnitus/chemically induced , Tinnitus/metabolism , Tinnitus/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...