ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A positive bronchodilator response has been defined as a 12% increase in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) from their respective pre-bronchodilator values, combined with at least a 0.2 L absolute change. Recent recommendations suggested the use of the percent change in FEV1 and FVC relative to their predicted normal values without having applied them in patients with airflow obstruction. The aim of the current study was to compare the two approaches over a wide range of pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and FVC values. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing spirometry and bronchodilator testing was completed. The change in FEV1 and FVC with a bronchodilator was expressed relative to the pre-bronchodilator and predicted normal FEV1 and FVC. RESULTS: In 1,040 patients with a non-paradoxical change in FEV1, 19.0% had a ≥ 12% change in FEV1 using their pre-bronchodilator value compared to 5.7% using their predicted normal value. For FVC, the respective values were 12.7% vs. 5.8%. The difference was retained in patients with a ≥ 0.2 L change in FEV1 or FVC. In unobstructed patients, the upper threshold (two standard deviations above the mean) of the bronchodilator response was 14% for FEV1 and 10% for FVC using predicted normal values. CONCLUSIONS: Expressing the percent change in FEV1 and FVC relative to predicted normal values reduces the over-estimation of the bronchodilator response, especially in patients with a very low pre-bronchodilator FEV1, including in those with a ≥ 0.2 L change in FEV1. Irrespective of pre-bronchodilator values, a ≥ 14% change in FEV1 and ≥ 10% change in FVC relative to the predicted normal values could be considered a positive bronchodilator response.
Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Bronchodilator Agents/pharmacology , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Reference Values , Lung , Vital Capacity , Spirometry , Forced Expiratory VolumeABSTRACT
Background: Concern for drug-drug interactions leading to treatment failure and drug-resistant strains have discouraged clinicians from attempting concomitant treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and tuberculosis (TB). Increased metabolism of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) by rifamycins has hindered concurrent use. Development of an assay for ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) serum concentrations for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can ensure adequate therapy. We present the first cases of concomitant therapy of active TB and HCV with rifamycin-containing regimens and DAAs using TDM. Methods: Using TDM, we aim to determine whether concomitant therapy with rifamycin-containing regimens and DAAs is safe and effective for patients coinfected with TB and HCV. Five individuals with TB and HCV who experienced transaminitis before or during TB therapy were concomitantly treated with rifamycin-containing regimens and LDV/SOF. Therapeutic drug monitoring was performed for LDV, SOF, and rifabutin during therapy. Baseline laboratory tests and serial liver enzymes were performed. Hepatitis C virus viral load and mycobacterial sputum cultures were obtained upon completion of therapy to determine efficacy of therapy. Results: All patients were found to have nondetectable HCV viral loads and negative mycobacterial sputum cultures upon completion of therapy. No clinically significant adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: These cases illustrate concomitant use of LDV/SOF and rifabutin in patients with HCV/TB coinfection. Utilizing serum drug concentration monitoring to guide dosing, correction of transaminitis were achieved, which allowed the use rifamycin-containing TB therapy. These findings suggest that concomitant therapy of TB/HCV is possible, safe, and effective.
