ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Lower face soft tissue thickness and dentoskeletal features form the lower facial profile. Sagittal skeletal malocclusions with varying degrees of soft tissue thickness in males and females were herein examined using soft tissue cephalometric radiography. METHODS: Based on their dentoskeletal correlations, a total of 160 lateral cephalometric radiographs of adult males and females (n = 80) seeking orthodontic treatment were classified as class I (n = 40), class II division 1 (n = 40), class II division 2 (n = 40), or class III (n = 40). Holdaway analysis was used to assess soft tissue thickness in seven linear parameters. RESULTS: In class I, class II division 1, class II division 2, and class III dentoskeletal connections, males exhibited larger soft tissue thickness. They have an average lower lip thickness, chin depth H, and depth V for class I males. Males and females differed from one another when it came to the thicknesses of the upper and the lower lips. These lip thicknesses as well as the chin's width differed more between men and women in class II division 1. Except for upper lip strain, all measures in the class II division 2 sample males demonstrated a greater significance. In the class III sample, males also demonstrated more significance than females. CONCLUSION: Males with various sagittal skeletal malocclusions demonstrated a significant difference in lower soft tissue thickness (characterized as thicker lower facial soft tissue) compared to female patients in class I, class II division 1, class II division 2, and class III malocclusions.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Differences in the mineral concentration (MC) level of dental enamel may represent a precursor of white spot lesions adjacent to fixed orthodontic brackets. The aim of the current in vitro study was to compare the MC level central, occlusal and cervical to orthodontic attachments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 16 enamel blocks were obtained from sound human premolar samples extracted for orthodontic reasons. The buccal portion of the dental enamel blocks was divided into central, occlusal, and cervical regions and then imaged and measured to calculate the level of MC using quantitative X-ray microtomography methods (XMT) at each site. RESULTS: There was a substantial variation in the mineral concentration with the lowest level being detected in the cervical region when compared with other regions. The MC of the gingival zone was significantly lower than that of the middle zone (P<0.05) and was insignificantly lower than that of the occlusal zone. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the current study, it can be concluded that the cervical region of the permanent enamel had the lowest mineral concentration using XMT. The cervical region may therefore be more vulnerable to the development of white spot lesions (WSLs) adjacent to a fixed orthodontic appliance during orthodontic treatment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Using X-ray microtomography lower mineral concentration in the cervical region of the enamel was observed. This may make these areas particularly susceptible to demineralisation during fixed appliance-based orthodontic treatment and may influence the bond strength of fixed orthodontic attachments.
