Temporal Trends of Enrollment by Sex and Race in Major Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trials.

Background: Women and racialized minorities continue to be underrepresented in cardiovascular (CV) trial outcomes data, despite comprising a significant global burden of CV disease. This study evaluated the impact of trial characteristics on the temporal enrollment of women and racialized minorities in prominent CV trials published in the period 1986-2023. Methods: MEDLINE was searched for CV trials published in The Lancet, the Journal of the American Medical Association, and the New England Journal of Medicine. Participant and investigator demographics, types of interventions, clinical indications, and funding sources were compared according to the enrollment of women or racialized minorities. Results: From 799 studies, including 4,071,921 patients, the enrollment of women and racialized minorities significantly increased from 1986 to 2023 (both P ≤ 0.001). Although the enrollment of women varied by trial indication, comprising 25.0% of coronary artery disease, 35.2% of noncoronary and/or vascular disease, 13.8% of heart failure, 17.0% of arrhythmia, and 28.7% of other CV trials (P ≤ 0.001), it did not differ by peer-reviewed vs industry funding. First authors who were women were more likely than first authors who were men to enroll significantly more women (P = 0.01). Conclusions: Active efforts to increase diverse enrollment, along with improved reporting, including of sex and race, in future CV trials may increase the generalizability of their findings and applicability to global populations.

Contexte: Les femmes et les groupes racisés demeurent sous-représentés dans les données de résultats d'essais cliniques sur les maladies cardiovasculaires (CV) malgré l'important fardeau global associé à ces maladies. Cette étude visait à évaluer l'effet des caractéristiques des essais sur la sélection temporelle des femmes et des membres de groupes racisés dans les essais portant principalement sur les maladies CV durant la période de 1986 à 2023. Méthodologie: La base de données MEDLINE a été consultée à la recherche d'essais sur les maladies CV publiés dans The Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association et New England Journal of Medicine. Les données démographiques des participants et des chercheurs, les types d'interventions, les indications cliniques et les sources de financement ont été comparés en fonction de la sélection des femmes ou des membres de groupes racisés. Résultats: Dans 799 études cumulant 4 071 921 patients, la sélection des femmes et des membres de groupes racisés a augmenté significativement entre 1986 et 2023 (p ≤ 0,001 dans les deux cas). Bien que la sélection des femmes variait en fonction des indications des essais, soit 25,0 % dans les essais portant sur les coronaropathies, 35,2 % pour les maladies non coronariennes et/ou vasculaires, 13,8 % pour l'insuffisance cardiaque, 17,0 % pour l'arythmie et 28,7 % pour d'autres maladies CV (p ≤ 0,001), elle ne différait pas selon que les études étaient révisées par des pairs ou qu'elles étaient financées par l'industrie. Lorsqu'une femme était l'autrice principale, le nombre de femmes sélectionnées était susceptible d'être plus élevé que lorsque l'auteur principal était un homme (p = 0,01). Conclusions: Des efforts actifs pour diversifier davantage la sélection des participants et mieux rendre compte des différences, notamment en ce qui concerne le sexe et la race, pourraient élargir la portée des conclusions des futurs essais sur les maladies CV et leur application à l'ensemble de la population.

Temporal Trends of Women Enrollment in Major Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Although it is known that women do not participate in trials as frequently as men, there are limited recent data examining how women recruitment has changed over time. METHODS: We conducted MEDLINE search using a validated strategy for randomized trials published in New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, and Journal of the American Medical Association between 1986 and 2015, and included trials evaluating pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic therapies. We abstracted data on demographics, intervention type, clinical indication, and trial design characteristics, and examined their relationships with women enrollment. RESULTS: In total, 598 trials met inclusion criteria. Women enrollment increased significantly over time (21% between 1986 and 1990 to 33% between 2011 and 2015; Pfor trend < 0.001) and did not differ by journal or funding source. Women enrollment varied with clinical indication, comprising 37% for non-coronary artery disease vascular trials, 30% for coronary artery disease trials, 28% for heart failure trials, and 28% for arrhythmia trials (P < 0.001), which were all significantly lower than the expected proportion in disease populations (P < 0.001). Women enrollment varied with trial type (31%, 29%, and 26% for pharmacologic, device, and procedural trials, respectively; P = 0.001). These findings were corroborated using multivariable analysis. We found significant positive correlations between women enrolled, and mean age and total number of participants. Fewer women were enrolled in trials reporting statistically significant results than those who did not (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although enrollment of women has increased over time, it remains lower than the relative proportion in the disease population. Future studies should elucidate the reasons for persistent under-representation of women in clinical trials.

Temporal Trends in Use of Composite End Points in Major Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trials in Prominent Medical Journals.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular mortality has decreased over the past 5 decades, making it increasingly difficult to demonstrate significant benefits of new therapies in randomized clinical trials. We sought to determine whether the use of composite end points in major cardiovascular trials has changed over time and examine temporal trends in the clinical importance of individual components of these composite end points. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a validated search strategy, we searched MEDLINE for randomized trials of therapies for primary or secondary cardiovascular prevention published in New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association between 1986 and 2015. We abstracted and categorized study population demographics, type of intervention, and primary and secondary outcomes. Composite end point components were ranked according to importance (minor, moderate, major, critical, and death) and temporal trends analyzed. In total, 604 of 2607 trials retrieved met inclusion criteria. Use of composite end points increased significantly over time from 18.8% between 1986 and 1990 to 83.0% between 2011 and 2015 (P<0.001). The number of components in the primary end point also increased significantly (median 1 in 1986-1990, median 3 in 2011-2015; P<0.001). Contemporary trials were more likely to include end points of lesser importance to patients (minor 3.1% and moderate 6.3% in 1986-1990, minor 4.5% and moderate 44.6% in 2011-2015; P<0.001). Use of death as the sole primary end point declined significantly over time (53.1% in 1986-1990, 17.9% in 2011-2015; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary cardiovascular randomized clinical trials are more likely to use primary composite end points that contain a larger number of components. Furthermore, these composite end points have increasingly incorporated components of lesser clinical importance. Clinicians and policymakers interpreting results of randomized trials should recognize that the significance of individual components in a composite end point is often heterogeneous.

Effect of voice recognition on radiologist reporting time.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect that voice recognition (VR) has on radiologist reporting efficiency in a clinical setting and to identify variables associated with faster reporting time. METHODS: Five radiologists were observed during the routine reporting of 402 plain radiograph studies using either VR (n = 217)or conventional dictation (CD) (n = 185). Two radiologists were observed reporting 66 computed tomography (CT) studies using either VR (n = 39) or CD (n = 27). The time spent per reporting cycle, defined as the radiologist's time spent on a study from report finalization to the subsequent report finalization, was compared. As well, characteristics about the radiologist and their reporting style were collected and correlated against reporting time. RESULTS: For plain radiographs, radiologists took 13.4% (P= 0.048) more time to produce reports using VR, but there was significant variability between radiologists. Significant association with faster reporting times using VR included: English as a first language (r = -0.24), use of a template (r = -0.34), use of a headset microphone (r = -0.46), and increased experience with VR (r= -0.43). Experience as a staff radiologist and having a previous study for comparison did not correlate with reporting time. For CT, there was no significant difference in reporting time identified between VR and CD (P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, VR slightly decreases the reporting efficiency of radiologists. However, efficiency may be improved if English is a first language, a headset microphone, and macros and templates are used.

Improvement in health-related quality of life in osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with osteoporosis and recent vertebral fractures suffer from pain and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). To determine whether patients with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide experienced improvement in HRQL and pain symptoms after several months of therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a sample of osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide in a Canadian rheumatology practice. We included patients that received teriparatide therapy with baseline and follow-up Mini-Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ) data. Follow-up data was measured at three or six months. We used a paired Student's t-test to compare baseline and follow-up measurements for each of the questionnaire's ten questions (five domains). Statistical analysis was also repeated to only include patients who suffered a prior vertebral fracture. RESULTS: 57 patients were included in the study, including 47 women. The mean age was 63.8 years (standard deviation 12.1 years). About sixty five percent (37/57) had previously sustained one or more osteoporotic fractures and about 38.6% (22/57) had suffered a prior vertebral fracture. About 44% (25/57) of individuals were taking one or more types of pain medications regularly prior to starting therapy. At follow-up, significant improvements were observed in the OQLQ domains of pain symptoms. This was seen when all patients on teriparatide were included, and also when only patients with prior vertebral fractures were included. There was also an improvement in emotional functioning, relating to fear of falling at 3 months follow-up (p = 0.019). Respondents also reported improvement in the domain of activities of daily living, relating to vacuuming at 6 months follow-up (p = 0.036), and an improvement in the leisure domain, relating to ease of traveling in the prior vertebral fracture population at 3 months follow-up (p = 0.012). However, there was no significant improvement observed in the domains of physical functioning. Participants also reported a decrease in need for pain medications, with 26% (15/57) requiring analgesics at the time of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Teriparatide use may be associated with improvements in HRQL in osteoporosis patients, in particular alleviation of pain symptoms. These results were especially evident in patients with a history of vertebral fractures. These findings should be confirmed in larger prospective studies with a suitable control group.