Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ; 2020: 5842150, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32395067

ABSTRACT

Background: Aerobic vaginitis (AV) is an aberration within the balanced vaginal microbiota. Only few reports have documented the adverse pregnancy outcomes related to AV. Nonetheless, the exact role of AV in pregnancy and the potential benefit of its screening need further study. Our goal was to evaluate the association between aerobic vaginitis (AV) in late pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: In this prospective observational study, a total of 600 singleton pregnant women with intact fetal membranes at a gestational age of 34-36 weeks were recruited (one hundred women with AV and 500 pregnant women without AV). The study protocol excluded patients with other forms of vaginal infection. Pregnancy outcomes were traced and documented. The primary outcome was the association between AV and preterm labor. The current study compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with and without AV in unadjusted and adjusted analyses with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) reported. Results: There was an association between AV and with preterm birth (adjusted OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.58-5.95) and prelabor rupture of membranes (adjusted OR 6.17, 95% CI 3.24-11.7). For neonatal outcomes, AV was associated with a higher incidence of neonatal ICU admission (adjusted OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.1-4.34). Severe forms of AV significantly increased the incidence of PTB (p = 0.0014) and PROM (p = 0.0094) when compared to less severe forms of AV. Conclusion: AV is common in late pregnancy and is linked to a diversity of adversative pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth, PROM, and neonatal ICU admission. Moreover, the incidence of PTB and PROM might further increase with the severity of AV. Clinicians should pay more consideration to vaginal microbiota assessment during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/etiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Vaginitis/complications , Adult , Aerobiosis , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/etiology , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 37(5): 491-496, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30866028

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vaginal progesterone (P) administration during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy on Doppler velocimetry of uterine, umbilical, and middle cerebral vessels. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study conducted on 80 women at risk for preterm labor. Uterine artery, umbilical artery, and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler indices were measured before and after 1 week of administration of 200 mg twice daily vaginal P. The primary outcome parameter was the change of MCA pulsatility index (PI) after P administration. Secondary outcomes included changes in uterine artery and umbilical artery Doppler measurement. RESULTS: There was no significant changes of umbilical artery resistance index (RI) (0.69 ± 0.049 vs. 0.68 ± 0.041), umbilical artery PI (1.14 ± 0.118 vs. 1.11 ± 0.116), uterine artery RI (0.66 ± 0.12 vs. 0.66 ± 0.107), uterine artery PI (1.00 ± 0.26 vs. 1.016 ± 0.24), and MCA PI (1.27 ± 0.18 vs. 1.26 ± 0.23) measurements before and after 1 week of P administration, respectively. CONCLUSION: Administration of vaginal P has no significant effects on uterine artery, umbilical artery, and MCA Doppler indices.


Subject(s)
Blood Flow Velocity/drug effects , Middle Cerebral Artery/physiology , Progesterone/administration & dosage , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Umbilical Arteries/physiology , Uterine Artery/physiology , Administration, Intravaginal , Adult , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Middle Cerebral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Middle Cerebral Artery/embryology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Regional Blood Flow/drug effects , Rheology , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Umbilical Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Umbilical Arteries/embryology , Uterine Artery/diagnostic imaging
3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 148(1): 113-117, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31593299

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flushing the cervical canal and the uterine cavity with local anesthetic in order to reduce the pain felt by patients during office hysteroscopy. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between May 1, 2018, and February 28, 2019, involving 260 women undergoing office hysteroscopy at Kasr Al Ainy Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Women were randomized using a computerized random number generator to intrauterine and intracervical instillation 5 minutes before the procedure of either 5 mL lidocaine 2% diluted in 15 mL normal saline, or 20 mL normal saline alone. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score reported by women during the procedure. Secondary outcomes included VAS score at 10 and 30 minutes after the procedure, the need for analgesia, and occurrence of vasovagal attacks. RESULTS: Women in the lidocaine flushing group reported a significantly lower VAS score during the procedure (1.8 ± 1.1 vs 5.2 ± 1.8) and 10 and 30 minutes after it (1.3 ± 1.15 and 0.8 ± 0.9 vs 4.3 ± 2.1 and 2.98 ± 1.96) when compared with control women (P<0.001). More women without lidocaine flushing experienced vasovagal attacks (25/130 vs 9/130, P<0.001) and needed analgesia (84/130 vs 13/130, P<0.001) when compared with women with lidocaine flushing. CONCLUSION: Flushing of the cervical canal and uterine cavity with local anesthetic significantly decreased pain sensation in women undergoing office hysteroscopy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03530488.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Hysteroscopy/methods , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Egypt , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pregnancy , Preoperative Care/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL