Intersectionality and Inclusive Serious Illness Communication in the Intensive Care Unit.

Serious illness communication can be especially distressing for patients who are critically ill and their loved ones who experience forms of discrimination based on identities such as their race, gender, sexual orientation, and other intersecting identities. In this article, we discuss the concept of intersectionality and its association with serious illness communication, decision-making, and care in the intensive care unit. Additionally, we present relevant concepts from clinical practice and contemporary nursing and health care literature to support critical care nurses in fostering more inclusive serious illness communication in the intensive care unit.

Impact of deceased organ donor marijuana use on donor culture positivity and solid organ transplant recipient outcomes.

With the increasing prevalence of marijuana use in the US, many deceased organ donors have a history of marijuana use, raising concerns about infectious risks to transplant recipients. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study in which exposed donors were those with recent marijuana use (in the prior 12 months) and unexposed donors were those with no recent marijuana use. Primary outcomes included the following: (1) positive donor cultures for bacteria or fungi, (2) recipient infection due to bacteria or fungi within 3 months posttransplant, and (3) recipient graft failure or death within 12 months posttransplant. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationship between donor marijuana use and each outcome. A total of 658 recipients who received organs from 394 donors were included. Recent marijuana use was not associated with donor culture positivity (aOR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.39-1.81, P = .65), recipient infection (aHR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.76-1.38, P = .90), or recipient graft failure or death (aHR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.90-3.02, P = .11). Our data suggest that organs from donors with a history of recent marijuana use do not pose significant infectious risks in the early posttransplant period.

Impact of deceased organ donor injection drug use on donor culture positivity and recipient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Due to the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States, deceased organ donors increasingly have a history of injection drug use (IDU), raising concerns about infectious risks to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We sought to determine how recent IDU among deceased organ donors impacted donor culture results and recipient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at three transplant centers. Exposed donors were those with "recent IDU" (in the prior 12 months). Primary outcomes included (1) positive donor cultures for bacteria or Candida species, (2) recipient bacterial or Candida infection within 3 months posttransplant, and (3) recipient graft failure or death within 12 months posttransplant. Mixed effects multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between recent donor IDU and each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 658 SOT recipients who received organs from 394 donors were included. Sixty-six (17%) donors had a history of recent IDU. Recent IDU in donors was associated with a significantly increased odds of donor culture positivity (aOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.06-12.60, p = .04) but was not associated with SOT recipient infection (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71-1.36, p = .92) or graft failure or death (aHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29-1.51, p = .33). CONCLUSION: Donors with recent IDU are more likely to have positive cultures, but their recipients' outcomes are unaffected, suggesting organs from donors with recent IDU may be safely utilized.

Impact of donor multidrug-resistant organisms on solid organ transplant recipient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of donor colonization or infection with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) on solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient outcomes remains uncertain. We thus evaluated the association between donor MDROs and risk of posttransplant infection, graft failure, and mortality. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed. All SOT recipients with a local deceased donor were included. The cohort was divided into three exposure groups: recipients whose donors had (1) an MDRO, (2) a non-MDRO bacterial or candidal organism, or (3) no growth on cultures. The primary outcomes were (1) bacterial or invasive candidal infection within 3 months and (2) graft failure or death within 12 months posttransplant. Mixed effect multivariable frailty models were developed to evaluate each association. RESULTS: Of 658 total SOT recipients, 93 (14%) had a donor with an MDRO, 477 (73%) had a donor with a non-MDRO organism, and 88 (13%) had a donor with no organisms on culture. On multivariable analyses, donor MDROs were associated with a significantly increased hazard of infection compared to those with negative donor cultures (adjust hazard ratio [aHR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.01-2.62, p = .04) but were not associated with graft failure or death (aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.15-1.36, p = .16). CONCLUSIONS: MDROs on donor culture increase the risk of early posttransplant infection but do not appear to affect long-term graft or recipient survival, suggesting organ donors with MDROs on culture may be safely utilized. Future studies aimed at reducing early posttransplant infections associated with donor MDROs are needed.

Antibiotic Utilization in Deceased Organ Donors.

Antibiotic use in deceased organ donors has not been previously described. In a retrospective cohort of 440 donors, we found 427 (97%) received at least one antibiotic course, 312 (71%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics, and 61 (14%) received potentially redundant antibiotics during their terminal hospitalization, suggesting a need for stewardship.

Impact of deceased donor multidrug-resistant bacterial organisms on organ utilization.

The extent to which donor multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) affect organ utilization remains unclear. We performed a retrospective cohort study at 4 transplant centers between 2015 and 2016 to evaluate this question. All deceased donors who donated at least one organ were included. Exposed donors had at least one MDRO on culture. Unexposed donors had no MDRO-positive cultures. Only cultures obtained during the donor's terminal hospitalization were evaluated. Multivariable regression was used to determine the association between donor MDRO and (1) number of organs transplanted per donor and (2) the match run at which each organ was accepted. Subsequently, we restricted the analysis to donors with MDR-Gram-negative (GN) organisms. Of 440 total donors, 29 (7%) donors grew MDROs and 7 (2%) grew MDR-GNs. There was no significant association between donor MDRO and either measure of organ utilization. However, donor MDR-GNs were associated with a significant reduction in the number of organs transplanted per donor (incidence rate ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.48, P < .01), and organs were accepted significantly further down the match list (relative count 5.08, 95% CI 1.64-15.68, P = .01). Though donor MDR-GNs were infrequent in our study, their growing prevalence could meaningfully reduce the donor pool over time.

Risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms among deceased organ donors.

Donor infection or colonization with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) affects organ utilization and recipient antibiotic management. Approaches to identifying donors at risk of carrying MDROs are unknown. We sought to determine the risk factors for MDROs among transplant donors. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at four transplant centers between 2015 and 2016. All deceased donors who donated at least one organ were included. Cultures obtained during the donor's terminal hospitalization and organ procurement were evaluated. The primary outcome was isolation of an MDRO on culture. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine risk factors associated with time to donor MDRO. Of 440 total donors, 64 (15%) donors grew an MDRO on culture. Predictors of an MDRO on donor culture included hepatitis C viremia (hazard ratio [HR] 4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-9.78, P = .002), need for dialysis (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.09-19.21, P = .037), prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HR 7.57, 95% CI 1.03-55.75, P = .047), and exposure to antibiotics with a narrow gram-negative spectrum (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27, P = .045). This is the first study to determine risk factors for MDROs among deceased donors and will be important for risk stratifying potential donors and informing transplant recipient prophylaxis.

Improving perceptions of patient safety through standardizing handoffs from the emergency department to the inpatient setting: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient handoffs have long been identified as a potentially challenging time for patients because poor communication produces numerous complications. This is especially true with regards to patient care handoffs between areas such as the emergency department (ED) and inpatient setting. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze existing literature pertaining to standardized handoffs between the ED and inpatient setting and its effect on perceived patient safety to guide future research, clinical practice, and patient safety. METHODS: A review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were selected using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria: primary research and patient handoff from the ED to the inpatient setting. Quality assessment of the studies was completed using The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. CONCLUSION: Existing studies demonstrate the potential for increased perception of patient safety as well as provider satisfaction when appropriate staff education and standardized handoff tools are implemented. There is a lack of data on the standardization of handoff tools between the ED and inpatient setting and their impact on perceived patient safety. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The combination of provider education and implementation of standardized handoff tools in the ED positively affects perceptions of patient safety and provider satisfaction. Hospital administrations should strongly consider incorporating standardized handoff tools into practice.

Gaining strength and focus from hardship.

Three members of my family have been diagnosed with cancer in the past five years. During the fall of my freshman year of high school, my older brother was diagnosed with acute lymphocytic leukemia. His health began to deteriorate in August 2006. My mother would take him to the hospital weekly, insisting that the doctors run every test on her ill-ridden son. Chris's diagnosis in November 2006 accounted for his rapidly failing health and provided treatment options that would hopefully restore his once lively appearance and attitude. Now, five years after his diagnosis and less than a year from completion of treatment, I am able to call Chris's cancer a blessing. During his intensive and long protocol, my focus was on how unfair this diagnosis was. It was as if my eyes were shielded from anything positive and all I could see was darkness. Why my family? Why my brother? Why me? Is he going to die? These thoughts constantly pounded my brain, drawing me deeper into self-wallowing and pity. And, with each obstacle, whether it was a grand mal seizure, a near-deadly rash, or some other allergic reaction, I would dive deeper into this darker state. It took me a year to finally be able to say my brother has cancer without bursting into tears. And, within two years, I was beginning to feel alive again as I watched my brother gain strength with each new day.