ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the recognition of the importance of physician knowledge and physician-patient communication about the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), few studies have explored this issue. Therefore, this study aims to assess physicians' knowledge and physician-patient communication regarding CAM. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians working at governmental hospitals and primary healthcare centers in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. The data collection tool was a validated English language questionnaire distributed using social media platforms. The questionnaire included sections to assess physician knowledge and communication about CAM. RESULTS: Of the 373 completed questionnaires, around 151 (40.5%) of the respondents stated that they have a poor level of knowledge about CAM, and 272 (72.9%) need to gain additional knowledge to properly counsel patients on CAM. Medical journals were the main source of knowledge about CAM. There were 121 (32.4%) physicians who believed that <20% of their patients use some form of CAM, and 180 (48.3%) believed that <20% of their patients spontaneously reported their CAM use without prompting or direct questioning. Around 180 (48.3%) of physicians believed that they asked <20% of their patients about using CAM. Regarding barriers that limit communication with the patient about CAM, the highest percentage was insufficient knowledge about CAM (137, 36.7%). CONCLUSION: The study showed that a significant number of physicians lack the appropriate knowledge about CAM and most of them agreed to gain additional knowledge to properly counsel their patients. Further research is needed to evaluate physicians' knowledge about CAM using a more objective method.
ABSTRACT
Background and purpose Vaccinations provide disease protection through a variety of mechanisms; however, vaccines can occasionally cause adverse effects. Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to assess the short- and long-term adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccinations in Saudi Arabia. Methods In Saudi Arabia, between October 2021 and October 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted. A validated Arabic and English dual-language online questionnaire were utilized to collect data. Results This investigation included 492 participants who were all immunized against the COVID-19 virus. There were 152 (30.9%) male participants and 340 (69.1%) female participants, with a mean age of 35±10.7 years. About 72.2% of study participants received three doses of vaccine, with 75.6% receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, 22.2% receiving the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, and 2.2% receiving the Moderna vaccine. Fever was observed in 66.3% (326/492) of the participants following vaccination, headache in 57.3% (282/492) of the participants, fatigue in 54.7% (269/492) of the participants, and influenza-like symptoms in 51% (251/492) of the participants. Younger participants (18-29 years old) exhibited influenza-like symptoms and fever after vaccination in comparison to older participants (P=0.03, P=0.02, respectively). In contrast, older participants reported more immobilization of the hands or legs, difficulty breathing, and chest pain than younger participants (P=0.04, P=0.02, and P=0.03, respectively). There was a significant correlation between gender and injection-site pain, headache, lethargy or convulsions, and flu-like symptoms. In addition, the participants' clinical history of chronic diseases was significantly associated with the occurrence of post-vaccination adverse effects. Conclusion The majority of the documented adverse reactions are of a temporary and minimal nature. Additional research is required to assess the enduring adverse reactions and efficacy of the vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 reoccurrence.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess social awareness of ischemic stroke amongst Saudi citizens in Medina city. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study conducted between February and September 2019, we used a validated questionnaire to conduct face-to-face interviews and collect data, at 4 shopping malls and 5 supermarkets in Medina city, KSA. RESULTS: Five hundred and nineteen participants completed the questionnaire. Of the respondents, 57.4% correctly defined stroke, 42.6% correctly chose ≥2 stroke signs and made ≤one mistake, 23.1% knew of blood clot-dissolving drugs, 32.8% correctly identified ≥ 4 risk factors with ≤ one mistake, 85.93% knew that going to the Emergency Room (ER) was the correct action, and 35.84% identified ≥ 3 post-discharge requirements, with ≤one mistake. Most participants (65.77%) cited internet and social media as information sources. In the univariate comparison, older age (p<0.001) and family history of stroke (p=0.001) better predicted stroke knowledge. In a multivariate logistic regression, the only predictor for stroke recognition was the educational level. The gender and family history were predictors for stroke signs knowledge. Educational level and the family history of stroke were predictors for risk factors knowledge respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed a significant stroke knowledge deficit in our Saudi cohort, thus there is a need to increase public awareness about stroke risk factors, warning signs and emphasizing prevention approaches.