ABSTRACT
Diabetes mellitus, a condition characterized by dysregulation of blood glucose levels, poses significant health challenges globally. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in managing diabetes, underpinned by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review scrutinized articles published between January 2019 and February 2024, sourced from six electronic databases: Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE, using keywords such as "Artificial intelligence use in medicine, Diabetes management, Health technology, Machine learning, Diabetic patients, AI applications, and Health informatics." The analysis revealed a notable variance in the prevalence of diabetes symptoms between patients managed with AI models and those receiving standard treatments or other machine learning models, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88-1.08, I2 = 0%). Sub-group analyses, focusing on symptom detection and management, consistently showed outcomes favoring AI interventions, with RRs of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87-1.08, I2 = 0%) for symptom detection and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.56-1.57, I2 = 0%) for management, respectively. The findings underscore the potential of AI in enhancing diabetes care, particularly in early disease detection and personalized lifestyle recommendations, addressing the significant health risks associated with diabetes, including increased morbidity and mortality. This study highlights the promising role of AI in revolutionizing diabetes management, advocating for its expanded use in healthcare settings to improve patient outcomes and optimize treatment efficacy.
ABSTRACT
Background Preoperative investigations are important to assess the clinical condition of patients who undergo elective surgical procedures. However, there is still debate about the usefulness of performing preoperative investigations. We aimed to determine the prevalence of routine preoperative investigation abnormalities among elective general surgery patients. Methodology This retrospective hospital-record-based study was conducted at the King Abdullah Hospital in Bisha Province, southern Saudi Arabia. General and clinical data of 968 patients who underwent elective surgical interventions from February 2022 to January 2023 were retrieved and analyzed. Result A total of 968 patients (578 females and 390 males) aged between 14 and 80 years were included in the study. Four hundred and eleven (42.5%) patients were in the age group of 40 years and above. The commonly detected comorbidities among the patients were diabetes (15%), hypertension (12%), respiratory diseases (7.5%), and cardiac diseases (2.5%). Abnormalities related to hemoglobin (31%), total leucocyte count (12.7%), and platelets (8.5%) were found in 968 patients. Around 15% of patients had increased creatinine levels. Hypokalemia was observed in 6.8% of patients. Increased liver enzymes were reported in limited proportions (10% to 14%) of patients. Slightly abnormal radiological findings were reported for chest X-ray (CXR) (2.8%), electrocardiogram (ECG) (2%), and Doppler echocardiography (Echo) (0.8%). A statistically significant association between the age of the patient and abnormal findings of ECG (p <.001), Echo (p = .001), and CXR (p <.001). Cardiac abnormalities were commonly associated with patients of ≥ 40 years. Abnormal cardiac findings (CXR, ECG, Echo) were significantly (p<.05) increased with the presence of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular comorbidities. Conclusions Preoperative testing revealed limited proportions of abnormal findings among patients with elective surgical procedures. Routine ordering of many preoperative investigations without specifications may not predict postoperative complications of the patients. Therefore, undertaking preoperative testing should be guided by targeted history, physical examination, clinical risk factors, and type of surgical procedure intended to be performed.
ABSTRACT
Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in women, often associated with metabolic issues like obesity and insulin resistance. Lifestyle changes, including weight loss, healthy eating, and regular exercise, are recommended for PCOS management. Studies have explored women's perspectives on these changes, revealing misconceptions and adherence challenges. Recognizing the importance of individualized interventions, particularly addressing knowledge gaps, is vital for improving the quality of life for women with PCOS, especially in cultural contexts like Saudi Arabia. Methodology This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Saudi Arabia from May to August 2023 including PCOS patients. Data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed using IBM SPSS 29 (IBM Corp. Released 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines and principles outlined by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Taif University (no.44-359). All participants provided informed consent, and the study protocols, including data collection, analysis, and publication, adhered to the relevant ethical standards. Results Our study included a majority aged 18-29 (27.4%), married individuals (55.6%) and those with a Bachelor's degree (72%). About 46.9% were medically diagnosed with PCOS. A notable proportion (70.2%) reported no family history of PCOS. Doctors were the primary information source (40.7%). Knowledge about PCOS was generally high, with correct recognition of various PCOS characteristics and treatment options. Attitudes were positive, especially among medically diagnosed individuals, and 91% believed weight reduction could improve PCOS symptoms. Lifestyle modification knowledge, attitude, and practices showed significant associations with demographic factors like age, place of residence, education, marital status, working in healthcare sectors, and PCOS diagnosis status. Conclusions Knowledge about PCOS is generally high among women with positive attitudes toward its management through lifestyle modifications. Women generally show positive practices of lifestyle modifications in PCOS, and they are associated with sociodemographic features.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Saudi Arabia has one of the highest obesity rates (35.4%) in the world, and bariatric surgery (BS) has emerged as the most effective treatment for obesity and its comorbidities. Despite its effectiveness, it is a known risk factor for cholelithiasis. The aim of this study is to identify the incidence and risk factors that contribute to the development of symptomatic cholelithiasis after different types of bariatric surgery in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted among the Saudi adult population. The sample size was 706 participants who underwent bariatric surgery from all over Saudi Arabia. Data collection was done through a validated online self-reported survey. RESULTS: Out of 706 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, it was found that the incidence of gallstones (GS) after bariatric surgery was 18.8%. The most incidence was during the first year of surgery, where the number of individuals reached 80.4%. The majority were in females (22.9%) and those who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery (51.2%). Patients who had a body mass index (BMI) of >25 kg/m² significantly had a higher incidence of gallstones (23.1%) compared to those who had a lesser BMI (15.8%). As the analysis showed, the medication used to prevent the occurrence of gallstones can be considered one of the protective factors, where 85.4% of individuals who used these medications did not develop cholelithiasis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of gallstones after bariatric surgery was high, particularly within the first year of surgery. The increase in postoperative gallstone formation is correlated with hyperlipidemia and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as basic predictive factors. On the contrary, the medication used to prevent the occurrence of gallstones is considered a protective factor.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A widespread and serious eye condition is a refractive error (RE). Globally, uncorrected refractive defects affect numerous individuals, with some who are blind. Numerous studies in Saudi Arabia have been conducted to assess reflective error. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding RE among school-age children in Bisha province, southwest Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and types of RE among school-age children in Bisha, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involved 360 schoolchildren from primary schools was carried out between December 2022 and November 2023 in Bisha. A validated questionnaire form was used to collect sociodemographic information and clinical data (history of the ocular problem, visual acuity test findings, and the refractor machine's result). RESULT: A total of 360 schoolchildren aged from seven to 14 years, with a mean of 10.1 years (standard deviation (SD)=2.05). The prevalence of hyperopia was 21% in the right eye and 23% in the left eye. In addition, the prevalence of myopia was 20% in the right eye and 22.5% in the left eye. A significant association between visual acuity and myopia (p=0.001). By contrast, there was no significant correlation between hyperopia and visual acuity (p=0.412). CONCLUSION: The current study summarized the prevalence of REs among school-age children in Bisha, Saudi Arabia. The study population included nearly half of those with at least some degree of RE. These results highlight the need for prompt and careful screening programs to detect and treat refractive disorders across this age range.
ABSTRACT
Omega is a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) that has an essential impact on cognitive performance at all stages of life. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) are essential for brain functions. DHA, the dominant omega-3 in the brain, impacts neurotransmitters and functions of the brain. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of omega-3 on brain functions. We searched for articles from 2010 to 2022 in PubMed, electronic databases: discover, academic search complete (EBSCO), and Cochrane. To increase search efficiency, search terms include database-specific indexed phrases and keywords. Search terms included "omega three," "DHA," "fish oil," "eicosapentaenoic acid," "EPA," "docosahexaenoic acid," "omega-3," "cognition," "brain," "mental health," and "PUFAs".We conducted a review of only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that were published in English. We evaluated the quality of the studies using the Cochrane Collaboration bias assessment tool. Our search strategy yielded 174 articles, out of which 33 full-text articles were reviewed and nine articles were selected for data abstraction. The overall number of individuals in all nine studies was 1319. Of the participants, 591 (44.81%) were men, and 728 (55.19%) were women. Participants who received omega-3 were 700 (65.06%) compared to 376 (34.94%) who received a placebo, and their mean age was 45. Ingestion of omega-3 fatty acids increases learning, memory, cognitive well-being, and blood flow in the brain. Omega-3 treatments are advantageous, well-tolerated, and risk-free. Lonelier people, the elderly, and those who eat fewer healthy foods containing omega-3 may benefit from an omega-3 supplement. We suggest that natural omega-3 consumption through the diet should be promoted.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nowadays patients are encouraged to partake in healthcare decision making and patient preferences are given increasing weight. Patient's choice is important to reduce waiting time and to encourage competition between providers, as most patients look for high-quality care while minimizing costs, according to different studies this may not be as simple as the attributes and factors that patients value when selecting a hospital or surgeon. Overall, Saudi Arabia has minimal research on how patients select surgeons or surgical facilities. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to evaluate the criteria Saudi population patients used to select their surgeons. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to determine the relative importance of the following aspects that patients may consider when selecting a surgeon: (a) physician-related considerations; (b) elements relating to healthcare service and access; (c) the perspectives of patients on various factors. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study attempts to investigate the criteria that people in Saudi Arabia considered most important while selecting their surgeons. This study was conducted between August and November 2022. The questionnaire is also given in English along with Arabic. RESULTS: Six hundred nine completed the survey with a response rate of 91.6%. Concerning physician-related factors considered when choosing a surgeon attitudes of the physician were the factor most significantly contributed to physician selection rather than reputation or professional experience and physician social media: (84.7%) mentioned that paying attention to patient's needs and opinions is important; sparing enough time for patients is important as reported by 83.9% of the participants; Personal care and hygiene is important for 83.4% of the participants; Communication skills were considered to be important as stated by 82.6% of the participants. Regarding healthcare services/access-related factors considered by patients in physician selection; it was found that patients considered hospital hygiene-cleanliness (91.3 %) as the most significant healthcare service/access-related factor in physician selection and then it comes Ease of obtaining an appointment (89.7%), reasonable scheduling and wait for time (87.7%) and cost of surgery (82.1%). Physician selection was deemed crucial to the success of the therapy by 87.7% of patients, while 88.3% of patients thought it was crucial to research the doctor before contacting her or him for the current admission. CONCLUSION: Patients consider a wide range of variables when selecting their surgeons and the location of their procedure. Depending on sociodemographic, cultural, and other aspects, the conditions surrounding patients' decisions may vary. Overall, the selection of a surgeon by surgery patients appears to be more influenced by the doctor's attitudes than by his or her reputation, professional experience, or social media presence. In order to elicit preferences across a wider range of surgical subspecialties and patient demographics, more study is necessary.
