ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is the leading etiology for atraumatic humeral head avascular necrosis worldwide. Treatment of this condition is not standardized, with only few studies evaluating clinical outcomes after surgical interventions. The aim of this study was to review the available evidence on the results of surgical intervention for humeral head avascular necrosis in the sickle cell disease population. METHODS: A systematic electronic search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Relevant studies that reported the outcomes of surgical intervention for humeral head avascular necrosis for patients with sickle cell disease were reviewed. Outcome parameters were pain, range of motion, specific shoulder outcome scores, and complications. RESULTS: Six studies, three retrospective cohorts (2 level III and 1 level IV) and three case series (level IV), were included in this review. A total of forty-three patients with sickle cell disease, comprising forty-nine shoulders, underwent different surgical procedures. Surgical procedures were core decompression, arthroscopic intervention, humeral head resurfacing, shoulder hemiarthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention for humeral head avascular necrosis in patients with sickle cell disease is selected based on the osteonecrosis stage. In the precollapse stage, core decompression is regarded as the first surgical option. However, in the light of current evidence, it has not been confirmed to prevent or delay natural progression of the disease. Shoulder arthroplasty is reserved for late stages, which despite the fairly good outcomes, data for long-term implant survival and complications are not well documented.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine the trends of kidney cancer over the last 2 decades in a subset of a Saudi Arabian population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary care center including all adult patients with primary kidney cancer who presented and were managed between 1990 and 2010. The time period was split into 4 quartiles, and variables tested and compared using chi-square, T-test, and Kaplan-Meier curves for survival. RESULTS: The total was 215 patients with a mean age of 57.8 years. There was an increase in the number of kidney cancer cases over the last 2 decades. There was no significant difference in the mode of presentation or stage distribution between quartiles. A significant change was observed in the management towards minimally invasive and nephron-sparing surgeries (p less than 0.001). There was no change in recurrence-free and disease-specific survival over the last 20 years. CONCLUSIONS: There have been an increasing number of kidney cancer patients over the last 2 decades with no observed migration towards more incidental and low stage tumors as compared with developed countries.
