Impact of Quiet Time on Psychological Outcomes of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Nurses in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although quiet time is implemented in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for the benefit of infants, it may also positively impact the psychological outcomes of healthcare professionals. Several studies have examined the impact of quiet-time implementation on patients; however, there is a paucity of research assessing its impact on the psychological outcomes of NICU nurses, particularly in Saudi Arabia. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This study aimed to assess the impact of quiet time on the psychological outcomes (stress, anxiety, and depression) of NICU nurses in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional design was used for this study. A total of 87 NICU nurses from two hospitals participated in this study. One group did not practice quiet time, while the second group did. A questionnaire survey assessed participants' demographic characteristics, and their depression, anxiety, and stress were assessed using the depression, anxiety, and stress scale-21 (DASS-21). The data were analyzed for frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD). Bivariate analysis, independent t-tests, and one-way analysis of variance were used to test the differences between variables and groups. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to analyze the relationships between continuous variables and perceived stress, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS: A substantial number of NICU nurses perceived stress, anxiety, and depression; however, there were no significant differences in perceived stress, anxiety, and depression between the nurses who worked in NICUs that applied quiet time and NICUs that did not (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study found no statistically significant relationship between quiet-time implementation and perceived stress, anxiety, or depression among NICU nurses. Further research with a larger sample size or increased quiet-time implementation may be required.

Octreotide Infusion for the Treatment of Congenital Chylothorax.

Congenital chylothorax is an uncommon cause of pleural effusion in the pediatric age group, and it should be kept in consideration when evaluating a neonate with pleural effusion, as it is the commonest cause of pleural effusion in this age group (Tutor, 2014). No commonly accepted guidelines have been published so far regarding the management of congenital chylothorax in the neonate, but trials of octreotide have appeared to be promising (Bellini et al., 2018). We present a neonate with congenital chylothorax successfully treated with octreotide infusion.

Evaluation of neonatal jaundice in the Makkah region.

The aims of this study were to detect the frequency at which the different types of neonatal jaundice occur in Makkah and to estimate the malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. This study included 239 neonates with neonatal jaundice, 20 anemic neonates and 21 healthy neonates. ABO incompatibility was observed in 31.6% of neonates with indirect hyperbilirubinemia, in 14.3% of those with early onset jaundice, in 9.5% of those with persistent jaundice, in 8.5% of those with physiological jaundice, in 5% of anemic neonates and in 12% of all neonates. glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency was observed in 10.5% of neonates with indirect hyperbilirubinemia, in 3.9% of those with physiological jaundice, in 11.1% of those with direct hyperbilirubinemia, in 12% of those with persistent jaundice, in 10% of anemic neonates and in 6.6% of all neonates. Rh incompatibility and polycythemia were found in 2.6% of neonates with indirect hyperbilirubinemia and in 0.4% of all neonates. In comparison to control group, MDA was significantly higher in all groups except for the anemic group. In conclusion, ABO incompatibility and G6PD deficiency frequently result in neonatal jaundice in Makkah, whereas Rh incompatibility and polycythemia are rare. The MDA level may serve as an indicator of oxidative stress.

Comparison of jeopardy game format versus traditional lecture format as a teaching methodology in medical education.

OBJECTIVE: To compare students` performance, satisfaction, and retention of knowledge between a `jeopardy game format` and a `didactic lecture format` in teaching viral exanthema to fifth-year medical students. METHODS: We conducted a parallel-group randomized controlled trial in the Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia from November 2008 to January 2009. We randomized fifth-year medical students into 2 groups. We taught viral exanthema to group one in lecture format, while group 2 received the same instruction in a jeopardy style game format. Both groups underwent a pretest, post-test I, and satisfaction survey. We conducted post-test II after 2 months to assess the retention of knowledge. The satisfaction survey consisted of 5 questions using a 5 point Likert scale. We used the paired sample t-test, and independent sample t-test to compare the results. RESULTS: Eighty-two students participated in the study (41 in each group). Both groups showed significant improvement in their knowledge on the post-test I compared with the pre-test scores. However, the post-test II conducted after 2 months showed that retention of knowledge was significantly better in the game format. The satisfaction survey showed that the game format was more enjoyable and fun. CONCLUSION: The game format teaching strategy has an added advantage in retaining knowledge of the subject for a longer time compared with a lecture format.