ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Autologous fat transfer (AFT) has been proposed as a possible treatment for scar tissue and its associated symptoms. Its effectiveness's evidence is yet unidentified though. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the currently available evidence on the efficacy and safety of autologous fat transfer in treating post-burn and post-traumatic scars using a validated scar measurement tool. METHODS: This study performed a systematic literature review in November 2023 using the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), PUBMED, and Google Scholar. The following key terms were included: (Fat grafting OR Autologous fat transfer) AND (body scars OR body burns OR body wounds) AND (Efficacy OR Safety OR satisfaction). We evaluated articles according to predefined quality criteria. The following data were included during the extraction period: patient demographics, indications for AFT, the number of AFT sessions, follow-up periods, and changes in the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores, which contain both the patient and observer components. RESULTS: This study included 1326 patients and 23 published articles. A total of 14 prospective studies, 7 retrospective studies, and 2 Randomized clinical trials studies were evaluated. These 23 articles came from diverse global locations; the earliest was published in 1992, and the most recently published in 2022. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated significant enhancements in scar characteristics from both patient and observer perspectives. Overall, AFT holds promise as a valuable treatment option for scar-related conditions as it enhances scar quality ,contributing to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Facelift surgery, also known as rhytidectomy, is a commonly performed procedure to address aging-related changes in the face and neck. Over the years, its techniques and methodologies have evolved. This study aimed to provide a bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited publications related to facelift surgery over a fifty-year period (1973-2023). METHODS: The authors obtained data from the Web of Science Core Collection on July 15, 2023. Using a predefined search strategy, the most cited articles from 1973 to 2023 on facelift surgery were identified. The publications were analyzed for their type of study, journal of publication, geographic origin, and primary outcomes. Furthermore, the authorship gender distribution was assessed. RESULTS: The majority of the publications (34 out of 50) were published in the "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery" journal. The USA contributed to 72% of the research, followed by the UK, Mexico, Australia, and Germany. The primary outcomes varied from surgical techniques, anatomical studies, risk factors, patient-specific outcomes, and facial rejuvenation techniques, to comparative and historical progression of techniques. Notably, male authors dominated the field with 47 out of 50 papers having both a first and senior male author. CONCLUSION: Facelift surgery has seen substantial research development over the past fifty years. The USA has been at the forefront of this research, with a predominant focus on surgical techniques and anatomical studies. Male dominance in authorship indicates potential scope for increased gender diversity in this specialty. Annual updates are recommended for continued insights. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .