ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) are associated with increased risk of bleeding events, including hemorrhagic stroke, and periprocedural and gastrointestinal bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) among this patient population has been uncertain with studies showing contradictory results. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for studies comparing outcomes among patients with and without significant CKD, and with and without ESRD who underwent LAAO device implantation. Data on outcomes from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed using random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. RESULTS: Data from eleven studies with 61,724 patients with and without kidney disease were included in the final analyses. There was an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.76, 95 % CI [1.15-6.64]; p = 0.02) and peri-procedural bleeding (1.51 [1.33-1.71]; p < 0.01) associated with kidney disease. There was no significant difference in risk of stroke (1.19 [0.70-2.03]; p = 0.53), pericardial effusion (1.22 [0.77-1.92]; p = 0.40), vascular complications (1.18 [0.92-1.52]; p = 0.20), or device related thrombus (1.13 [0.53-2.40]; p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an increased risk of complications among patients with kidney disease, who undergo LAAO device implantation. These findings suggest the need for studies with randomized control design specifically designed to compare outcomes with LAAO versus anticoagulation in the CKD and ESRD populations.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides mechanical cardioembolic protection for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who cannot use oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT). Patients with a thrombotic event despite OAT are at high risk for recurrence and may also benefit from LAAO. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the efficacy of LAAO in AF patients with a thrombotic event on OAT compared to: 1) LAAO in AF patients with a contraindication for OAT; and 2) historical data. METHODS: The international LAAO after stroke despite oral anticoagulation (STR-OAC LAAO) collaboration included patients who underwent LAAO because of thrombotic events on OAT. This cohort underwent propensity score matching and was compared to the EWOLUTION (Evaluating Real-Life Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology) registry, which represents patients who underwent LAAO because of OAT contraindications. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. Event rates were compared between cohorts and with historical data without OAT, yielding relative risk reductions based on risk scores. RESULTS: Analysis of 438 matched pairs revealed no significant difference in the ischemic stroke rate between the STR-OAC LAAO and EWOLUTION cohorts (2.5% vs 1.9%; HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.72-2.61). STR-OAC LAAO patients exhibited a higher thromboembolic risk (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.04-2.83) but lower bleeding risk (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18-0.88) compared to EWOLUTION patients. The mortality rate was slightly higher in EWOLUTION (4.3% vs 6.9%; log-rank P = 0.028). Relative risk reductions for ischemic stroke were 70% and 78% in STR-OAC LAAO and EWOLUTION, respectively, compared to historical data without OAT. CONCLUSIONS: LAAO in patients with a thrombotic event on OAT demonstrated comparable stroke rates to the OAT contraindicated population in EWOLUTION. The thromboembolic event rate was higher and the bleeding rate lower, reflecting the intrinsically different risk profile of both populations. Until randomized trials are available, LAAO may be considered in patients with an ischemic event on OAT.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Cardiac Catheterization , Contraindications, Drug , Ischemic Stroke , Registries , Humans , Atrial Appendage/physiopathology , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Female , Male , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Aged , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment , Aged, 80 and over , Time Factors , Administration, Oral , Ischemic Stroke/prevention & control , Ischemic Stroke/mortality , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Treatment Failure , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Recurrence , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , EuropeABSTRACT
Advances in cardiology have led to improved survival among patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Racial disparities in cardiovascular and maternal outcomes are well known and are likely to be more profound among pregnant women with CHD. Using the 2001 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all hospitalizations for delivery among women ≥ 18 years of age with CHD. Unadjusted and adjusted between-race differences in adverse maternal cardiovascular, obstetric, and fetal events were assessed using logistic regression models. During the study period, we identified 52,711 hospitalizations for delivery among women with concomitant CHD. Of these, 66%, 11%, and 16% were White, Black, and Hispanic, respectively. Obstetric complications and fetal adverse events were higher among Blacks compared to Whites and Hispanics (44% vs. 33% vs. 37%, p < .001; 36% vs. 28% vs. 30%, p < .001), respectively. No between-race differences were observed in overall cardiovascular adverse events (27% vs. 24% vs. 23%, p < .21). However, heart failure was significantly higher among Black women (3.6% vs. 1.7% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.001). While a lower income quartile was associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes, adjustment for income did not attenuate the adverse impact of race. Black females with CHD diagnoses were more likely to experience adverse obstetric, fetal events, and heart failure compared to White and Hispanic women irrespective of their income status. Further research is needed to identify causes and devise interventions to mitigate racial disparities in the care of pregnant women with CHD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Scarce data exist on the evolution of device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of persistent and recurrent DRT in LAAC recipients. METHODS: Data were obtained from an international multicenter registry including 237 patients diagnosed with DRT after LAAC. Of these, 214 patients with a subsequent imaging examination after the initial diagnosis of DRT were included. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was defined as either persisting or recurrent DRT. RESULTS: DRT resolved in 153 (71.5%) cases and persisted in 61 (28.5%) cases. Larger DRT size (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.15; P = 0.009) and female (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.12-5.26; P = 0.02) were independently associated with persistent DRT. After DRT resolution, 82 (53.6%) of 153 patients had repeated device imaging, with 14 (17.1%) cases diagnosed with recurrent DRT. Overall, 75 (35.0%) patients had unfavorable evolution of DRT, and the sole predictor was average thrombus size at initial diagnosis (OR per 1-mm increase: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; P = 0.003), with an optimal cutoff size of 7 mm (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.39-4.52; P = 0.002). Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a higher rate of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT (26.7% vs 15.1%; HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.15-3.94; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: About one-third of DRT events had an unfavorable evolution (either persisting or recurring), with a larger initial thrombus size (particularly >7 mm) portending an increased risk. Unfavorable evolution of DRT was associated with a 2-fold higher risk of thromboembolic events compared with resolved DRT.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Thromboembolism , Thrombosis , Humans , Female , Incidence , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Thromboembolism/diagnostic imaging , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/etiology , Stroke/etiologyABSTRACT
Our study aimed to explore the national trends in the rates of perioperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and readmissions after pericardiectomy and the impact of center volume on these outcomes. Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, we identified patients who underwent isolated pericardiectomy from 2010 to 2019. In-hospital mortality and readmission rates were assessed using orthogonal polynomial contrasts, with the linear and nonlinear trends evaluated as needed. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify the independent predictors of mortality and readmission. All analyses accounted for the Nationwide Readmission Database sampling design and were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.) with p <0.05 used to indicate statistical significance. A total of 26,169 hospitalizations for pericardiectomy were identified during the study period. The median age was 59 years and 44% were female. In-hospital mortality was 5.2%, and the median length of stay was 7 days. Advanced age, higher co-morbidity index, and lower annual facility pericardiectomy volume were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The 30- and 90-day readmission rates after pericardiectomy were 18% and 28%, respectively. Previous cardiac surgery, diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis, and greater co-morbidity score were independent predictors of readmission. In conclusion, isolated pericardiectomy rates have remained mostly constant, with relatively small changes in in-hospital mortality and 30- and 90-day readmission rates over the last decade. Advanced age, lower facility pericardiectomy volume, and higher Elixhauser co-morbidity index are independent predictors of surgical mortality.
Subject(s)
Patient Readmission , Pericardiectomy , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Male , Hospital Mortality , Contrast Media , Databases, FactualABSTRACT
Intracoronary imaging (ICI) facilitates stent implant by characterizing the lesion calcification, providing accurate vessel dimensions, and optimizing the stent results. We sought to investigate the outcomes of routine ICI versus coronary angiography (CA) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second- and third-generation drug-eluting stents. A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases was conducted from their inception to July 16, 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing routine ICI with CA. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary outcomes of interest were target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and cardiac and all-cause mortality. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled incidence and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 9 randomized controlled trials with 5,879 patients (2,870 ICI-guided and 3,009 CA-guided PCI) met the inclusion criteria. The ICI and CA groups were similar in demographic characteristics and co-morbidity profiles. Compared with CA, patients in the routine ICI-guided PCI group had lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78, p <0.0001), target lesion revascularization (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.83, p = 0.002), target vessel revascularization (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.00, p = 0.05), and myocardial infarction (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.95, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in stent thrombosis or cardiac/all-cause mortality between the 2 strategies. In conclusion, routine ICI-guided PCI strategy, compared with CA guidance alone, is associated with improved clinical outcomes, largely driven by lower repeat revascularization.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Drug-Eluting Stents , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Thrombosis , Humans , Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Stents/adverse effects , Thrombosis/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD), defined by the concurrent presence of aortic stenosis (AS) and insufficiency is frequently seen in patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, studies comparing the outcomes of TAVI in MAVD versus isolated AS have demonstrated conflicting results. Therefore, we aim to assess the outcomes of TAVI in patients with MAVD in comparison with those with isolated severe AS. Patients who underwent native valve TAVI for severe AS at 3 tertiary care academic centers between January 2012 and December 2020 were included and categorized into 3 groups based on concomitant aortic insufficiency (AI) as follows: group 1, no AI; group 2, mild AI; and group 3, moderate to severe AI. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality and all-cause readmission rates at 30 days and 1 year. Other outcomes include bleeding, stroke, vascular complications, and the incidence of paravalvular leak at 30 days after the procedure. Of the 1,588 patients who underwent TAVI during the study period, 775 patients (49%) had isolated AS, 606 (38%) had mild AI, and 207 (13%) had moderate to severe AI. Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores were significantly different among the 3 groups (5% in group 1, 5.5% in group 2, and 6% in group 3, p = 0.003). Balloon-expandable valves were used in about 2/3 of the population. No statistically significant differences in 30-day or 1-year all-cause mortality and all-cause readmission rates were noted among the 3 groups. Post-TAVI paravalvular leak at follow-up was significantly lower in group 1 (2.3%) and group 2 (2%) compared with group 3 (5.6%) (p = 0.01). In summary, TAVI in MAVD is associated with comparable outcomes at 1 year compared with patients with isolated severe AS.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aspiration is utilized for removal of thrombi and vegetations in inoperable patients and high-risk surgical candidates where medical therapy alone is unlikely to achieve desired outcome. A number of case reports and series have been published since the introduction of AngioVac system (AngioDynamics Inc., Latham, NY) in 2012 where this technology was used in the treatment of endocarditis. However, there is a lack of consolidated data reporting on patient selection, safety and outcomes. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for publications reporting cases where transcatheter aspiration was used for endocarditis vegetation debulking or removal. Data on patient characteristics, outcomes and complications from select reports were extracted and systematically reviewed. RESULTS: Data from 11 publications with 232 patients were included in the final analyses. Of these, 124 had lead vegetation aspiration, 105 had valvular vegetation aspiration, and 3 had both lead as well as valvular vegetation aspiration. Among the 105 valvular endocarditis cases, 102 (97 %) patients had right sided vegetation removal. Patients with valvular endocarditis were younger (mean age 35 years) vs. patients with lead vegetations (mean age 66 years). Among the valvular endocarditis cases, there was a 50-85 % reduction in vegetation size, 14 % had worsening valvular regurgitation, 8 % had persistent bacteremia and 37 % required blood transfusion. Surgical valve repair or replacement was subsequently performed in 3 % and in-hospital mortality was 11 %. Among patients with lead infection, procedural success rate was reported at 86 %, 2 % had vascular complications and in-hospital mortality was 6 %. Persistent bacteremia, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and clinically significant pulmonary embolism occurred in about 1 % each. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aspiration of vegetations in infective endocarditis has acceptable success rates in vegetation debulking as well as rates of morbidity or mortality. Large prospective multi-center studies are warranted to determine predictors of complications, thus helping identify suitable patients.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Endocarditis , Female , Humans , Adult , Aged , Prospective Studies , Vacuum Curettage , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Endocarditis/surgery , Bacteremia/complications , Bacteremia/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with readmission following hospitalization for catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified all hospitalizations from the last quarter of 2015 through 2019 with a Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group designation for a percutaneous intracardiac procedure, a procedure code for CA, and a primary discharge diagnosis of AF. Cases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at index hospitalization were excluded to define stable CAD. The primary outcome was all-cause 90-day hospital readmission; secondary end points included readmissions for AF, repeated CA, ACS, and heart failure (HF). RESULTS: Among 28,466 hospitalizations for CA for AF identified, 3171 (11.1%) involved patients with stable CAD. No hospitalizations included patients with HF diagnosis codes. The incidence of 90-day all-cause readmission was higher in patients with stable CAD (18.4% [400 of 2172] vs 14.4% [2549 of 17,667]; P=.006), as was the incidence of subsequent hospitalization with ACS (5.3% [21] vs 1.1% [28]; P<.001) or HF (17.0% [68] vs 10.2% [260]; P=.007). The incidence of readmission within 90 days with recurrent AF did not differ for those with or without stable CAD (21.9% [88] vs 26.5% [675]; P=.217). Pooled analysis of 90-day HF readmissions revealed a higher incidence among older patients, those with chronic kidney or pulmonary disease, and those with persistent and chronic AF subtypes. CONCLUSION: Results of this large-scale analysis suggest that among patients hospitalized for CA for AF, stable CAD is associated with hospital readmissions within 90 days, including admissions for ACS and decompensated HF.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Failure , Humans , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Patient Readmission , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Risk Factors , Medicare , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Readmission following Heart failure (HF) hospitalization is common: 25% are readmitted within a month of discharge and ≈50% within 6 months. A small proportion of these patients can have multiple readmissions within this period, adding disproportionately to the health care costs. In this study, we assessed the trends, predictors and costs associated with multiple readmissions using National readmissions database (NRD). METHODS: We queried NRD for HF hospitalizations from 2010 to 2018 using ICD-9/10-CM codes. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare readmission cohorts, with the multivariable model adjusting for other factors. All analyses accounted for the NRD sampling design were conducted using SAS v. 9.4 with p < 0.05 used to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Within the study period, an estimated 6,763,201 HF hospitalizations were identified. Of these, 58% had no readmission; 26% had 1 readmission; and 16% had ≥2 readmissions within 90 days of index hospitalization. There was no statistically significant change in readmission rates during the observation period. Multiple readmissions which accounted for 37% of all readmissions contributed to 57% of readmission costs. Younger age was identified as a predictor of multiple readmissions while sex, comorbidities and the type of insurance were not significantly different from those with single readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple readmissions in HF are common (16%), have remained unchanged between 2010 and 2018 and impose a significant health care cost burden. Future research should focus on identifying these patients for targeted intervention that may minimize excessive readmissions particularly in those patients who are in the palliation phase of HF.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Patient Readmission , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Comorbidity , Patient Discharge , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Databases, FactualABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Absence of subclinical atherosclerosis is considered safe to defer statin therapy in general population. However, impact of statins on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes stratified by coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and extent of non-obstructive CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has not been evaluated. METHODS: CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multi-center Registry) study enrolled consecutive adults 18 years of age between 2005 and 2009 who underwent 364-detector row CCTA for suspected CAD. The long-term registry includes data on 12,086 subjects who underwent CCTA at 17 centers in 9 countries. In this sub-study of CONFIRM registry, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and without diabetes mellitus with normal CCTA or non-obstructive plaque (<50 % diameter stenosis) for whom data on baseline statin use was available were included. CAC score was calculated using Agatston score. The magnitude of non-obstructive coronary artery disease on CCTA was quantified using segment involvement score (SIS). Primary outcome was major cardiovascular events (MACE) which included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel re-vascularization. RESULTS: A total of 7247 patients (Mean age 56.8 years) with a median follow up of 5 years were included. For DM patients, baseline statin therapy significantly reduced MACE for patients with CAC ≥100 (HR: 0.24; 95 % CI 0.07-0.87; p = 0.03) and SIS≥3 (HR: 0.23; 95 % CI 0.06-0.83; p = 0.024) compared to those not on statin therapy. Among Diabetics with lower CAC (<100) and SIS (≤3) scores, MACE was similar in statin and non-statin groups. In contrast, among non-DM patients, MACE was similar in statin and no statin groups irrespective of baseline CAC (1-99 or ≥100) and SIS. CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter cohort of patients, the presence and extent of subclinical atherosclerosis as assessed by CAC and SIS identified patients most likely to derive benefit from statin therapy.
Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Coronary Artery Disease , Diabetes Mellitus , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Atherosclerosis/complications , Atherosclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , RegistriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at an increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. Hypertensive emergency (HTNE), a complication of hypertension with potentially serious health implications, has high healthcare utilization. We attempted to determine the association between HIV status and risk for 30-day readmission after index hospitalization for HTNE. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify all of the admissions during 2010-2017 with a primary discharge diagnosis of HTNE. Admissions were stratified by HIV status and comparisons were made with the χ2 test. We investigated predictors of all-cause 30-day readmission via multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 612,854 hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of HTNE were identified, and 4115 (0.7%) were HIV positive. There was a total of 43,937 (7.16%) 30-day readmissions, and the rate was higher in regard to positive HIV status (29.8% vs 15.0%; P < 0.001). Renal failure was the most frequent reason for HIV readmissions and the second most frequent reason for non-HIV readmissions (15.6% vs 10.3%; P < 0.001). In contrast, heart failure was the most frequent reason for non-HIV readmissions and the second most frequent reason for HIV readmissions (10.3% vs 11.9%; P = 0.234). There was a higher median cost for HIV readmissions in comparison to non-HIV readmissions ($7660 vs $7490; P < 0.001). Finally, HIV was attributed to 40.6% increased odds of readmission after adjusting for pertinent clinical and demographic factors (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HIV-positive status is associated with an increased risk for 30-day readmission after index hospitalization for HTNE.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Patient Readmission , Databases, Factual , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Patient DischargeABSTRACT
AIMS: Studies comparing outcomes of multivessel (MV) vs. culprit-vessel (CV) only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during index cardiac catheterization in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) have reported conflicting results. In this systematic review we aim to investigate outcomes with MV vs. CV-only revascularization strategies in patients with acute MI and CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were queried for studies comparing MV vs. CV PCI in patients with acute MI and CS. Data were extracted and pooled by means of random effects model. Primary outcome was early all-cause mortality (up to 30 days), while the secondary outcomes included late all-cause mortality (mean, 11.4 months), stroke, new renal replacement therapy, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and bleeding. Pooled odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated. A total of 16 studies enrolling 75 431 patients were included. The MV PCI was associated with higher risk of early mortality [OR 1.17, 95% CI (1.00-1.35); P = 0.04; NNH = 62], stroke [1.15 (1.03-1.29); P = 0.01; NNH = 351], and new renal replacement therapy [1.33 (1.06-1.67); P = 0.01; NNH = 61]; and with lower risk of repeat revascularization [0.61 (0.41-0.89); P = 0.01] when compared with CV PCI. No significant difference was observed in late-term mortality [1.02 (0.84-1.25); P = 0.84], risk of reinfarction [1.13 (0.94-1.35); P = 0.18], or bleeding [1.21 (0.94-1.55); P = 0.13] between groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with acute MI and CS, MV PCI during index cardiac catheterization was associated with higher risk of early mortality, stroke, and renal replacement therapy.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Stroke , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Hemorrhage , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: Cardiac troponin (cTn) can also be elevated in patients with non-cardiac illnesses. The utility of elevated cTn in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively identified all patients admitted with AGIB who had cTn ordered. We assessed the prevalence, predictors and mortality. Results: A total of 172 patients with AGIB were included in the study, of whom 17% had abnormal cTn. Predictors of elevated cTn were advanced age, lower BMI, coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease. The abnormal cTn group had more cardiac consultation and procedures and longer length of stay. However, there was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Conclusion: Elevated cTn in patients with AGIB was associated with more cardiology consultation and downstream cardiac testing, greater delay to endoscopic evaluation and longer length of stay, without significantly affecting the mortality.
Cardiac troponin (cTn) is a type of protein found in the heart muscles. It is released into the bloodstream when heart muscles become damaged. However, cTn can also be elevated in patients with non-cardiac illnesses, such as critically ill patients and patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB). This study analyzed the relationship between elevated cTn and the outcomes (including prevalence, predictors and mortality) in patients with AGIB. A total of 172 patients with AGIB were evaluated. They were divided into groups based on the presence of elevated cTn. The prevalence of elevated cTn in AGIB patients was 17%. Older age, lower BMI, coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease were found to be some of the factors that can predict cTn elevation in AGIB patients. AGIB patients with elevated cTn had more cardiology service consultations and procedures and longer lengths of hospital stay. However, there was no effect of elevated cTn on the death rate of AGIB patients.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Troponin , Acute Disease , Biomarkers , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Prevalence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Myocardial injury occurs in 20% to 30% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection, and cardiovascular complications contribute to approximately 40% of all COVID-19-related deaths. Most cases of myocarditis related to COVID-19 infection occur in the acute phase of infection and are self-limited. We describe a case of delayed-onset fulminant myocarditis that developed 5 weeks after mild COVID-19 infection leading to cardiogenic shock and the need for mechanical circulatory support. Our case illustrates how myocarditis can occur as a late complication of COVID-19 infection, even in those with a mild initial course.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: To assess gender differences in in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmission rates among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the USA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalizations for TAVR were retrospectively identified in the National readmissions database (NRD) from 2012 to 2017. Gender based differences in in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmissions were explored using multivariable logistic regression models. During the study period, an estimated 171â361 hospitalizations for TAVR were identified, including 79â722 (46.5%) procedures in women and 91â639 (53.5%) in men. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality and 90-day all-cause readmissions were significantly higher for women compared with men (2.7% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.002; 25.1% vs. 24.1%, P = 0.012, respectively). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, women had 13% greater adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.26, P = 0.017], and 9% greater adjusted odds of 90-day readmission compared with men (aOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.14, P < 0.001). During the study period, there was a steady decrease in-hospital mortality (5.3% in 2012 to 1.6% in 2017; Ptrend < 0.001) and 90-day (29.9% in 2012 to 21.7% in 2017; Ptrend < 0.001) readmission rate in both genders. CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality and readmission rates for TAVR hospitalizations have decreased over time across both genders. Despite these improvements, women undergoing TAVR continue to have a modestly higher in-hospital mortality, and 90-day readmission rates compared with men. Given the expanding indications and use of TAVR, further research is necessary to identify the reasons for this persistent gap and design appropriate interventions.
Subject(s)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission , Retrospective Studies , Sex Characteristics , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on influence of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). METHODS: Adult AMI-CS admissions from 2008 to 2017 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample and stratified by BMI into underweight (<19.9 kg/m2), normal-BMI (19.9-24.9 kg/m2) and overweight/obese (>24.9 kg/m2). Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, invasive cardiac procedures use, hospitalization costs, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of 339,364 AMI-CS admissions, underweight and overweight/obese constitute 2356 (0.7%) and 46,675 (13.8%), respectively. In 2017, compared to 2008, there was an increase in underweight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.40 [95% confidence interval {CI} 4.91-8.31]; p < 0.001) and overweight/obese admissions (aOR 2.93 [95% CI 2.78-3.10]; p < 0.001). Underweight admissions were on average older, female, with non-ST-segment-elevation AMI-CS, and higher comorbidity. Compared to normal and overweight/obese admissions, underweight admissions had lower rates of coronary angiography (57% vs 72% vs 78%), percutaneous coronary intervention (40% vs 54% vs 54%), and mechanical circulatory support (28% vs 46% vs 49%) (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was lower in underweight (32.9% vs 34.1%, aOR 0.64 [95% CI 0.57-0.71], p < 0.001) and overweight/obese (27.6% vs 38.4%, aOR 0.89 [95% CI 0.87-0.92], p < 0.001) admissions. Higher hospitalization costs were seen in overweight/obese admissions while underweight admissions were discharged more often to skilled nursing facilities. CONCLUSION: Underweight patients received less frequent cardiac procedures and were discharged more often to skilled nursing facilities. Underweight and overweight/obese AMI-CS admissions had lower in-hospital mortality compared to normal BMI.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Adult , Body Mass Index , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and financial burden to the United States health system. A change in focus towards preventive medicine along with advances in pharmacologic and invasive therapies, has led to improved cardiac death rates. These benefits however, come with increased prevalence of heart failure and soaring readmission rates. Reducing burden of hospitalizations has therefore, been a focus of clinicians and researchers over the years. An improvement in clinical outcomes has been demonstrated in multiple trials investigating HF therapies, however, execution of guideline recommendations has been trailing. Over the past decade, 2 classes of hypoglycemic agents, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been recognized for their cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits. Studies have shown that there has been a steady increase in prescription rates of these medications, however, overall usage remains quite low. Various patient, physician and system-based factors have been identified that cause barriers to translation of trial data to real-world clinical outcomes. A strategy focused on physician and patient education, quality improvement, multi-disciplinary team approach, and patient centered care is essential to meet treatment goals.