ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Retrospective studies indicate that dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may be preceded by a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) prodrome. Research criteria for the prospective identification of MCI with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) have been developed. We aimed to assess the prognosis of a prospectively identified MCI-LB cohort at 2 key milestones, 3- and 5 years after diagnosis, to examine classification stability over time and rates of adverse outcomes (dementia or death). METHODS: This was a retrospective examination of data from 2 longitudinal observational cohort studies where participants with MCI were prospectively recruited from North East England and differentially classified as MCI due to Alzheimer disease (MCI-AD), possible MCI-LB, or probable MCI-LB. Adverse outcomes (DLB/other dementia or death) and stability of disease-specific classifications were examined in each group. RESULTS: Of 152 participants with baseline MCI (54 MCI-AD, 29 possible MCI-LB, and 69 probable MCI-LB), 126 were followed for up to 3 years (mean age 75.3 years; 40% female). We found that prospective probable MCI-LB classifications were both sensitive (91%) and specific (94%) to classifications either remaining as probable MCI-LB or progressing to DLB (in some cases autopsy confirmed) for 3 or more years after. Classifications were at least as stable as those in MCI-AD. In this cohort with disease-specific MCI classifications, rates of progression to dementia were high: 55% of MCI-LB had developed DLB within 3 years. Dementia occurred in 47% of MCI-AD over the same duration (odds ratio 1.68, 95% CI 0.66-4.26, p = 0.278). Premature death was a common competing risk, occurring in 9% of MCI-AD and 11% of MCI-LB within 3 years. DISCUSSION: These findings support that prospectively identified probable MCI-LB is a prodromal presentation of DLB and that disease-specific classifications of MCI may reliably identify different prodromal dementias.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Disease Progression , Lewy Body Disease , Humans , Female , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Male , Lewy Body Disease/diagnosis , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Longitudinal Studies , Prognosis , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inpatient prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) delirium varies widely across the literature. Delirium in general older populations is associated with adverse outcomes, such as increased mortality, dementia, and institutionalisation. However, to date there are no comprehensive prospective studies in PD delirium. This study aimed to determine delirium prevalence in hospitalised PD participants and the association with adverse outcomes, compared to a control group of older adults without PD. METHODS: Participants were hospitalised inpatients from the 'Defining Delirium and its Impact in Parkinson's Disease' and the 'Delirium and Cognitive Impact in Dementia' studies comprising 121 PD participants and 199 older adult controls. Delirium was diagnosed prospectively using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition criteria. Outcomes were determined by medical note reviews and/or home visits 12 months post hospital discharge. RESULTS: Delirium was identified in 66.9% of PD participants compared to 38.7% of controls (p < 0.001). In PD participants only, delirium was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality (HR = 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-8.6), p = 0.014) and institutionalisation (OR = 10.7 (95% CI = 2.1-54.6), p = 0.004) 12 months post-discharge, compared to older adult controls. However, delirium was associated with an increased risk of developing dementia 12 months post-discharge in both PD participants (OR = 6.1 (95% CI = 1.3-29.5), p = 0.024) and in controls (OR = 13.4 (95% CI = 2.5-72.6), p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Delirium is common in hospitalised PD patients, affecting two thirds of patients, and is associated with increased mortality, institutionalisation, and dementia. Further research is essential to understand how to accurately identify, prevent and manage delirium in people with PD who are in hospital.
Subject(s)
Delirium , Dementia , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Aged , Prospective Studies , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/etiology , Longitudinal Studies , Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/complicationsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Clinical parkinsonism is a core diagnostic feature for mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) but can be challenging to identify. A five-item scale derived from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) has been recommended for the assessment of parkinsonism in dementia. This study aimed to determine whether the five-item scale is effective to identify parkinsonism in MCI. METHODS: Participants with MCI from two cohorts (n = 146) had a physical examination including the UPDRS and [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT striatal dopaminergic imaging. Participants were classified as having clinical parkinsonism (P+) or no parkinsonism (P-), and with abnormal striatal dopaminergic imaging (D+) or normal imaging (D-). The five-item scale was the sum of UPDRS tremor at rest, bradykinesia, action tremor, facial expression, and rigidity scores. The ability of the scale to differentiate P+D+ and P-D- participants was examined. RESULTS: The five-item scale had an AUROC of 0.92 in Cohort 1, but the 7/8 cut-off defined for dementia had low sensitivity to identify P+D+ participants (sensitivity 25%, specificity 100%). Optimal sensitivity and specificity was obtained at a 3/4 cut-off (sensitivity 83%, specificity 88%). In Cohort 2, the five-item scale had an AUROC of 0.97, and the 3/4 cut-off derived from Cohort 1 showed sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 82% to differentiate P+D+ from P-D- participants. The five-item scale was not effective in differentiating D+ from D- participants. CONCLUSIONS: The five-item scale is effective to identify parkinsonism in MCI, but a lower threshold must be used in MCI compared with dementia.