ABSTRACT
Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) affects approximately 40-70% of patients and can have varying degrees of severity. Even mild cognitive impairment can impact on quality of life and productivity. Despite this, patients are not routinely screened or monitored for cognitive impairment in Australia due to a range of issues, with time and space being the main limiting factors. This Australian multidisciplinary perspective provides recommendations on cognition management in Australia. It gives a broad overview of cognition in MS, advice on the screening and monitoring tools available to clinicians, and strategies that can be implemented in clinics to help monitor for cognitive impairment in patients with MS. We suggest a routine baseline assessment and multidomain cognitive battery in regular intervals; a change should trigger a thorough investigation of the cause.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Neuropsychological Tests , Australia , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , CognitionABSTRACT
Purpose of Review: The association of multiple sclerosis (MS) with depression has been well documented; however, it frequently remains undiagnosed, untreated, or undertreated, with consequences to the person, family, and economy. The aim of this study was to determine the quality, scope, and consistency of available guidelines and consensus statements to guide clinicians managing people with comorbid MS and depression. Recent Findings: Based on our systematic search of the literature, 6 guidelines and consensus statements met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 4 presented recommendations on depression screening in MS and 5 offered recommendations for treatment. Despite most guidelines presenting evidence-based recommendations, they were generally of low-quality evidence overall. Inconsistencies identified across guidelines and consensus statements included variations in recommendation for routine screening and which screening tool to use. Most guidelines lacked detail, often referring to general population guidelines without describing to what extent they can be applied to people with MS. Summary: The findings of this review highlight the need to develop high-quality, comprehensive clinical practice guidelines with clear recommendations that can be globally implemented by healthcare clinicians working with people with MS.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: People with multiple sclerosis (MS) are susceptible to severe COVID-19 outcomes. They were included as a priority group for the Australian COVID-19 vaccine roll-out in early 2021. However, vaccine hesitancy remains a complex barrier to vaccination in this population group, which may be partly related to disease relapse concerns following COVID-19 vaccination. This study examined the COVID-19 vaccination status, intent, hesitancy, and disease-related beliefs in people with MS. METHODS: An online survey was conducted with people with MS receiving care at two Australian health services between September and October 2021. It collected sociodemographic and disease-specific characteristics and responses to validated scales that assessed vaccine hesitancy and general and MS-related vaccine beliefs. RESULTS: Of the 281 participants [mean age 47.7 (SD 12.8) years; 75.8% females], most (82.9%) had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Younger participants were less likely to be vaccinated, as were those within 1-5 years of disease duration. After controlling for age, disease duration was not associated with vaccination status. Unvaccinated participants were more likely to report less willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, higher vaccine complacency and lower vaccine confidence, greater MS-related vaccine complacency, and higher MS and treatment interaction concerns. CONCLUSIONS: People with MS reported a high vaccination rate, despite general and MS-specific COVID-19 vaccine concerns. Greater MS-specific concerns were reported by those who indicated that their MS was not well-controlled and their MS impacted their daily activities. By understanding the factors that influence vaccine hesitancy and their interplay with MS disease course and treatment concerns, this can inform tailored interventions and educational messages to address these concerns in people with MS. Clinicians, governments, and community organisations are key partners in delivering these interventions and messages, as ongoing booster doses are needed for this vulnerable population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Depression is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), with lifetime prevalence estimates between 25 and 50%. Depression is commonly underdiagnosed and undertreated in people with MS. This qualitative study assessed current practices, as well as facilitators and required resources to improve detection and management of depression in people with MS. METHODS: MS clinicians living in Australia were recruited through MS healthcare provider clinics and networks for online interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded in NVivo for framework analysis. RESULTS: Participants included 15 MS specialists: nine nurses and six neurologists. Participants appreciated that depression was a common symptom of MS, and that untreated depression impacted patients' wellbeing, medication adherence, capacity for self-care, employment, and interpersonal relationships. Participants did not routinely screen for depression and noted that they lack the time and skills to manage depression once identified, most often recommending patients see their general practitioner. Clinicians recognised that people with MS commonly experience barriers to identifying and managing depressive symptoms, however few clinics provide information or discussion about depression as a symptom of MS with patients. CONCLUSION: Participants indicated a need for evidence-based guidance, more education and training to improve practices including screening for depression, and an urgent need for local referral pathways to affordable and accessible mental health services for people with MS. Findings suggest a need for better collaborative management of depression and improvement of systematic practices related to depression information, screening and treatment support.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/therapy , Health Personnel , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Qualitative Research , SpecializationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Depression is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), yet often goes undetected, untreated or undertreated. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative research explored current practices, barriers and facilitators for detection and treatment of depression in Australians with MS. METHODS: Participants were 26 people with MS recruited through social media. Participants completed the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression-Revised (CESD-R) scale and in-depth telephone or video interviews. Interviews were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: Scores measured on the CESD-R proposed 73% of participants were experiencing severe depression symptoms. Participants reported that depression is not regularly and formally assessed through MS healthcare services and they are offered limited information about depression in MS. Barriers to mental health support included recognition of depression, resistance to treatment and limitations of collaborative support between general practitioners and MS healthcare services. Participants expressed a need for open conversations and information about depression during neurology consultations. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, improved detection and treatment of depression in people with MS requires: 1) better provision of information about depression for people with MS through healthcare services and community organisations; 2) regular screening and assessment; 3) better healthcare services collaboration to improve management.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Australia/epidemiology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/therapy , Humans , Mental Health , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is critical for the realization of pharmacotherapy benefits and reduced healthcare expenditure. Studies have shown up to 60% of people with Multiple sclerosis (MS) experience suboptimal medication adherence, which is associated with poorer health outcomes and subsequent discontinuation. The current systematic review reported on objectively measured adherence and discontinuation rates for self-administered oral and injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). OBJECTIVES: To identify whether, in people with MS, the introduction of oral DMTs has improved medication adherence when compared with injectable DMTs. The secondary aim was to report synthesized objectively measured medication adherence and persistence rates for both oral and injectable DMTs in MS across varying study durations. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria were limited to English, peer-reviewed, objective, self-administered DMT articles, published between July 1993 to December 2019. Publications reporting combined intravenous and self-administered DMT data, or that did not account for DMT switching in discontinuation rates, were excluded. Data were synthesized into observation lengths ranging from less than 8 months to greater than 36 months. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were undertaken on both oral and injectable 12-month adherence and discontinuation data. RESULTS: In total, 61 articles were included; 46 articles examined adherence and 26 examined discontinuation. Twelve-month adherence ranged between 53.0% to 89.2% for oral (N = 7) and 47.0% to 77.4% for injectable DMTs (N = 7). Results from the meta-analysis and meta-regression show significantly higher pooled mean medication possession ratio (MPR) adherence for oral DMTs (91.0%) when compared to injectable DMTs (77.0%) over 12 months (ß = -0.146; 95% CI: -0.263 to -0.029). Results indicate major asymmetry across studies (LFK index: -5.18), proposing the presence of significant publication bias. Mean discontinuation over 12 months was between 10.5% to 33.3% for oral (N = 7) and 15.2% to 50.8% for injectable DMTs (N = 10), with meta-analysis results indicating the presence of significant heterogeneity (I2 Injectable: 99.5%; I2 Oral: 93.1%) between studies included in each subgroup. However, no appreciable difference in mean discontinuation rates across groups (Injectable: 27%; 95% Cl: 19.0%-34.0%; Oral: 24%; 95% CI: 17.0%-31.0%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Medication adherence for oral DMTs suggests a significant improvement compared to adherence for injectable DMTs. No significant difference in discontinuation rates between oral and injectable DMTs was found. Oral DMT adherence and persistence studies are limited, given their relatively recent introduction. Suboptimal medication adherence and discontinuation issues remain present for both oral and injectable DMTs. Future studies would benefit from improved consistency in methodology, such as comparable adherence and persistence definitions. DISCLOSURES: The authors did not receive any funding for this study. Mardan and Hussain have nothing to disclose. Grech reports grants from Merck Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work. Allan reports grants received from Merck Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Allan holds advisory board and consulting positions with Merck and advisory board positions for Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis, for which Monash Institute of Neurological Diseases receives consulting fees.
Subject(s)
Medication Adherence , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Injection site reactions (ISRs) and flu-like symptoms (FLS) are common in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with peginterferon beta-1a. The purpose of this Delphi analysis was to explore peginterferon beta-1a discontinuation rates across MS treatment centers, to obtain consensus on effective mitigation and management strategies for ISRs and FLS, and to identify areas where additional training and education for nurses and patients could improve treatment outcomes. METHODS: In this modified Delphi process, an international steering committee of eight MS-certified nurses developed two rounds of surveys, which were completed by 262 and 188 MS nurses, respectively, representing nine countries. RESULTS: On average, nurses reported that 25% and 30% of patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a experienced ISRs and FLS, respectively. Discontinuation due to severe ISRs or FLS was most common in the first 6 months of treatment, yet follow-up visits typically took place 6 months after peginterferon beta-1a initiation. Preferred management strategies for ISRs included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and rotation of the injection site, whereas preferred management strategies for FLS included acetaminophen/paracetamol and hydration/nutrition. Most nurses (77%) agreed that additional education and training on ISR and FLS management would bolster their confidence in treating patients with these symptoms. CONCLUSION: Delphi respondents reached consensus on ISR and FLS management strategies, which can help to inform treatment decisions. The results of this global Delphi analysis indicate that management of ISRs and FLS could be improved with more frequent follow-up visits and individualized training and education.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this study was to examine discontinuation rates associated with delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) when used for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) in a real-world, clinical practice setting. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from charts of adult patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated at a single large institution in Australia, who completed at least 6 months of continuous therapy, either with DMF or another MS medication administered following DMF discontinuation. The primary endpoint was overall discontinuation rate. Secondary endpoints included discontinuation rate 6 months after initiation of DMF therapy; incidence of adverse events, particularly gastrointestinal events; discontinuation rate because of adverse events; and use of concomitant medications by patients during administration of DMF. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients initially prescribed DMF between October 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014 were included in the analysis. The mean age of the patients was 43 years and 80% were female. The overall discontinuation rate was 13%, with 9% discontinuing because of gastrointestinal tolerability issues, within the first 6 months. Dose changes as a result of adverse events occurred in 15% of patients, and none of the adverse events reported were serious. Only one patient discontinued owing to lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: This study, conducted shortly after the approval of DMF in Australia when first-hand clinical experience was still limited, demonstrated that DMF has an acceptable tolerability profile in the real-world setting that is similar to that demonstrated in clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/urine , Pigments, Biological/urine , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/urine , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Catheter-Related Infections/drug therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Color , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Risk Assessment , Syndrome , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/therapy , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Renal Patient Support Group (RPSG) is a voluntary Facebook group that was developed in 2009 in the UK. The RPSG now has in excess of 5000 members. OBJECTIVE: To highlight the work of the RPSG and to describe how the use of social media has helped raise awareness of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The RPSG offers online peer support internationally, with members sharing their experiences. METHODS: Since the RPSG is mainly a Facebook platform, this medium has lent itself to raising CKD awareness, also allowing group members to share real-life stories. CONCLUSION: The RPSG continues to expand and invites health professionals to gain opportunities provided by social media networks to improve the health of their patients by facilitating and getting involved in 'real' discussions.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Kidney Failure, Chronic/nursing , Kidney Failure, Chronic/psychology , Self-Help Groups , Social Media , Awareness , Humans , Internationality , Minority Groups/psychology , Renal Dialysis/nursing , Renal Dialysis/psychology , Tissue and Organ ProcurementABSTRACT
Dopamine and dopamine-receptor function are often implicated in behavioral inhibition, and deficiencies within behavioral inhibition processes linked to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and drug addiction. In the stop-signal task, which measures the speed of the process of inhibition [stop-signal reaction time (SSRT)], psychostimulant-related improvement of SSRT in ADHD is linked with dopamine function. However, the precise nature of dopaminergic control over SSRT remains unclear. This study examined region- and receptor-specific modulation of SSRT in the rat using direct infusions of the dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1) antagonist SCH 23390 or dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) antagonist sulpiride into the dorsomedial striatum (DMStr) or nucleus accumbens core (NAcbC). DRD1 and DRD2 antagonists had contrasting effects on SSRT that were specific to the DMStr. SCH 23390 decreased SSRT with little effect on the go response. Conversely, sulpiride increased SSRT but also increased go-trial reaction time and reduced trial completion at the highest doses. These results suggest that DRD1 and DRD2 function within the DMStr, but not the NAcbC, may act to balance behavioral inhibition in a manner that is independent of behavioral activation.