Where do we look when we walk on stairs? Gaze behaviour on stairs, transitions, and handrails.

Stair walking is a challenging locomotor task, and visual information about the steps is considered critical to safely walk up and down. Despite the importance of such visual inputs, there remains relatively little information on where gaze is directed during stair walking. The present study investigated the role of vision during stair walking with a specific focus on gaze behaviour relative to (1) detection of transition steps between ground level and stairs, (2) detection of handrails, and (3) the first attempt to climb an unfamiliar set of stairs. Healthy young adults (n = 11) walked up and down a set of stairs with 7 steps (transitions were defined as the two top and bottom steps). Gaze behaviour was recorded using an eye tracker. Although participants spent most part of the time looking at the steps, gaze fixations on stair features covered less than 20% of the stair walking time. There was no difference in the overall number of fixations and fixation time directed towards transitions compared to the middle steps of the stairs. However, as participants approached and walked on the stairs, gaze was within 4 steps ahead of their location. The handrail was rarely the target of gaze fixation. It is noteworthy that these observations were similar even in the very first attempt to walk on the stairs. These results revealed the specific role of gaze behaviour in guiding immediate action and that stair transitions did not demand increased gaze behaviour in comparison with middle steps. These findings may also indicate that individuals may rely on a spatial representation built from previous experience and/or visual information other than gaze fixations (e.g. dynamic gaze sampling, peripheral visual field) to extract information from the surrounding environment.

Aging does not affect generalized postural motor learning in response to variable amplitude oscillations of the support surface.

Postural motor learning for dynamic balance tasks has been demonstrated in healthy older adults (Van Ooteghem et al. in Exp Brain Res 199(2):185-193, 2009). The purpose of this study was to investigate the type of knowledge (general or specific) obtained with balance training in this age group and to examine whether embedding perturbation regularities within a balance task masks specific learning. Two groups of older adults maintained balance on a translating platform that oscillated with variable amplitude and constant frequency. One group was trained using an embedded-sequence (ES) protocol which contained the same 15-s sequence of variable amplitude oscillations in the middle of each trial. A second group was trained using a looped-sequence (LS) protocol which contained a 15-s sequence repeated three times to form each trial. All trials were 45 s. Participants were not informed of any repetition. To examine learning, participants performed a retention test following a 24-h delay. LS participants also completed a transfer task. Specificity of learning was examined by comparing performance for repeated versus random sequences (ES) and training versus transfer sequences (LS). Performance was measured by deriving spatial and temporal measures of whole body center of mass (COM) and trunk orientation. Both groups improved performance with practice as characterized by reduced COM displacement, improved COM-platform phase relationships, and decreased angular trunk motion. Furthermore, improvements reflected general rather than specific postural motor learning regardless of training protocol (ES or LS). This finding is similar to young adults (Van Ooteghem et al. in Exp Brain Res 187(4):603-611, 2008) and indicates that age does not influence the type of learning which occurs for balance control.

Behaviour and gaze analyses during a goal-directed locomotor task.

The objectives of the current study were: (a) to determine whether perception-action coupling controlled behaviours when walking through moving doors and (b) to determine how vision contributed to this behaviour. Participants (N = 6) walked along a 7-m path toward two motor-driven doors, which moved at rates ranging between 20 and 40 cm/s. Each door was independently driven such that both moved at the same velocity (symmetrical) or at different velocities (asymmetrical). The results showed that in both door movement conditions the participants controlled their approach velocity by slowing down prior to crossing the doors. The decrease in walking velocity produced greater velocity variability in the final stages prior to crossing the doors and high success rates. The results from the gaze behaviours showed that fixation durations were significantly longer when the doors moved asymmetrically, suggesting that the visual information from this unpredictable environment took longer to process. However, the fixation patterns were similar between the two door movement conditions. Regardless of the door movement condition, the participants spent about 60% of each trial fixating environmental objects (i.e., left door, right door, or aperture). The majority of fixations were directed towards one of the doors at the beginning of the trial and then shifted towards the aperture in the final phase. The participants were using perception-action coupling to control their behaviours in the final phase in order to steer locomotion through the aperture.

Strategies used to walk through a moving aperture.

The objectives of the study were to determine what strategy (pursuit or interception) individuals used to pass through an oscillating target and to determine if individuals walked towards where they were looking. Kinematic and gaze behaviour data was collected from seven healthy female participants as they started at one of five different starting positions and walked 7 m towards an oscillating target. The target was a two-dimensional 70 cm aperture made by two-76 cm wide doors and oscillated between two end posts that were 300 cm apart. In order to quantify the objectives, target-heading angles [Fajen BR, Warren WH. Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2003;29(2):343-62; Fajen BR, Warren WH. Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot. Perception 2004;33:689-715] were calculated. Results showed that the participants used neither an interception nor a pursuit strategy to successfully pass through the moving aperture. The participants steered towards the middle of the pathway prior to passing through the middle of the aperture. A cross correlation between the horizontal gaze locations and the medial/lateral (M/L) location of the participants' center of mass (COM) was performed. The results from the cross correlation show that during the final 2s prior to crossing the aperture, the participants walked where they were looking. The findings from this study suggest that individuals simplify a task by decreasing the perceptual load until the final stages. In this way the final stages of this task were visually driven.

Validating determinants for an alternate foot placement selection algorithm during human locomotion in cluttered terrain.

The goal of this study was to validate dynamic stability and forward progression determinants for the alternate foot placement selection algorithm. Participants were asked to walk on level ground and avoid stepping, when present, on a virtual white planar obstacle. They had a one-step duration to select an alternate foot placement, with the task performed under two conditions: free (participants chose the alternate foot placement that was appropriate) and forced (a green arrow projected over the white planar obstacle cued the alternate foot placement). To validate the dynamic stability determinant, the distance between the extrapolated center of mass (COM) position, which incorporates the dynamics of the body, and the limits of the base of support was calculated in both anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions in the double support phase. To address the second determinant, COM deviation from straight ahead was measured between adaptive and subsequent steps. The results of this study showed that long and lateral choices were dominant in the free condition, and these adjustments did not compromise stability in both adaptive and subsequent steps compared with the short and medial adjustments, which were infrequent and adversely affected stability. Therefore stability is critical when selecting an alternate foot placement in a cluttered terrain. In addition, changes in the plane of progression resulted in small deviations of COM from the endpoint goal. Forward progression of COM was maintained even for foot placement changes in the frontal plane, validating this determinant as part of the selection algorithm.