ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The average age and number of comorbidities is increasing among trauma patients. Primary care providers (PCPs) provide pre-injury diagnosis and management of comorbidities that may affect outcomes for injured patients. The role of primary care in trauma systems is currently unknown. METHODS: Observational retrospective review of an institutional trauma databank from 2013 - 2019. PCP was extracted from the electronic medical record and combined with trauma data. Case-control matching was performed to compare outcomes between patients with and without primary care based on age, injury severity score, sex, and injury mechanism. Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and multivariate regression described differences between subgroups. Primary outcome was difference in mortality rate for injured patients with and without PCPs. RESULTS: Within the study period, 19,096 patients were included. 6,626 (34.7%) had a PCP recorded. Of these, 2,158 were matched in a case-control design. Patients with PCPs had a lower mortality rate (1.6%) compared to patients without PCPs (3.6%, P < 0.01). PCP retention was associated with longer length of stay overall, equivalent rates of complications (5.4% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.63), and similar numbers of ICU and ventilator days. Multivariate logistic regression controlling for case-control factors, insurance, and comorbidities conferred an odds ratio of 2.58 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.59 - 4.19, P < 0.001) for survival to discharge. CONCLUSION: Pre-injury primary care significantly improves the odds of survival to discharge for injured patients. Prospective study of this relationship may identify strategies to promote primary care within health systems.
Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/therapySubject(s)
Hospitals, Pediatric/standards , Public Health , Quality Improvement , Vital Signs/physiology , Child , Humans , OhioABSTRACT
Operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU) handoffs are complex and known to be associated with adverse events and patient harm. The authors hypothesized that handoff quality diminishes during nights/weekends and that bedside handoff practices are similar between ICUs of the same health system. Bedside OR-to-ICU handoffs were directly observed in 2 surgical ICUs with different patient volumes. Handoff quality measures were compared within the ICUs on weekdays versus nights/weekends as well as between the high- and moderate-volume ICUs. In the high-volume ICU, transmitter delivery scores were significantly better during off hours, while other measures were not different. High-volume ICU scores were consistently better than those in the moderate-volume ICU. Bedside handoff practices are not worse during off hours and may be better in ICUs used to a higher patient volume. Specific handoff protocols merit evaluation and training to ensure consistent practices in different ICU models and at different times.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Patient Handoff , After-Hours Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Patient Handoff/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health CareSubject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Latin America , Employment , Work , Uruguay , Economics , Occupational GroupsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To review our experience in the management of children who present with hepatoblastoma. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty patients treated for hepatoblastoma at a single institution were reviewed. RESULTS: Ten patients presented with stage I to stage II disease and underwent resection. Seventeen presented with stage III disease; two underwent initial resection of which one required rescue transplantation. The remaining 15 underwent biopsies, which were followed by chemotherapy. Nine patients had a reduction in tumor size and underwent conventional resection. One required rescue transplantation for residual disease. Five patients underwent primary transplantation for unresectable disease. One patient expired during chemotherapy. Three patients presented with stage IV disease and underwent biopsies, which were followed by chemotherapy. One patient responded but required "rescue" transplantation after conventional resection. Seven patients underwent aggressive conventional resection (trisegmentectomy or central liver resection); three had positive surgical margins and underwent transplantation. One developed recurrent disease. Five-year survival was 82.5% +/- 7.1%. There was no operative mortality during surgical therapy. All transplant recipients were tumor free, but one died from lymphoma 7 years post-transplant. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy may reduce tumor size, allowing for conventional resection. If aggressive resection is necessary or bi-lobar disease persists, primary transplantation is recommended.