ABSTRACT
Background and purpose: This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence physiotherapists' decision in choosing restorative or compensatory rehabilitation during gait training in people with neurological disorders (PwNDs) and the different treatments used in the approaches. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used the baseline data from an observational cohort study. We analyzed data from 83 PwNDs (65 people after stroke, 5 with multiple sclerosis, and 13 with Parkinson's disease) who underwent at least 10 sessions of physiotherapy (PT) focusing on gait function. Performance was quantified using the modified Dynamic Gait Index (MDGI), three impairment domains of Fugl-Meyer Assessment for lower extremity (mFM-LL), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), modified Barthel Index (mBI), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Motivational Index (MI). Forty-three physiotherapists completed a treatment report form categorizing the rehabilitation approach and specifying treatments used (e.g., resistance training and proprioceptive exercises). Results: Fifty-six subjects underwent restorative rehabilitation approach. The univariate predictors of restorative approach were being in the subacute phase with a disease onset of less than 180 days, (odds ratio [95%CI]; 3.27[1.19-9.24]), mFM-LL (1.25[1.11-1.44]), MMSE (0.85[0.67-1.00]), and number of sessions (1.03[1-1.01]). The backward stepwise analysis revealed an association between restorative and subacute phase (36.32[4.11-545.50]), mFM-LL (3.11[1.55-9.73]), mBI (1.79[1.08-3.77]), MMSE (0.46[0.25-0.71]), and the interaction between mFM-LL and mBI (0.99[0.98-1.00]). No statistically significant association between treatments used and approach was found (p = 0.46). Discussion and conclusion: The restorative approach was more commonly used to improve gait. The main variables associated with this approach were: being in the subacute phase of the disease, a low level of impairment, and a high level of functional independence at baseline. However, few differences were found between the treatments used for the restorative or compensatory approaches, as similar PT treatments were used for both.
ABSTRACT
Despite their relevance in neurorehabilitation, physical therapy (PT) goals and interventions are poorly described, compromising a proper understanding of PT effectiveness in everyday clinical practice. Thus, this paper aims to describe the prevalence of PT goals and interventions in people with neurological disorders, along with the participants' clinical features, setting characteristics of the clinical units involved, and PT impact on outcome measures. A multicenter longitudinal observational study involving hospitals and rehabilitation centers across Italy has been conducted. We recruited people with stroke (n = 119), multiple sclerosis (n = 48), and Parkinson's disease (n = 35) who underwent the PT sessions foreseen by the National Healthcare System. Clinical outcomes were administered before and after the intervention, and for each participant the physical therapists completed a semi-structured interview to report the goals and interventions of the PT sessions. Results showed that the most relevant PT goals were related to the ICF activities with "walking" showing the highest prevalence. The most used interventions aimed at improving walking performance, followed by those aimed at improving organ/body system functioning, while interventions targeting the cognitive-affective and educational aspects have been poorly considered. Considering PT effectiveness, 83 participants experienced a clinically significant improvement in the outcome measures assessing gait and balance functions.
