ABSTRACT
Aim: Proof-of-concept study, highlighting the clinical diagnostic ability of FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF MS, combined with WGS. Materials & methods: 104 pathogenic isolates of Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus were analyzed. Results: Overall prediction accuracy was 99.6% in FT-IR and 95.8% in MALDI-TOF-MS. Analysis of N. meningitidis serogroups was superior in FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF-MS. Phylogenetic relationship of S. pyogenes was similar by FT-IR and WGS, but not S. aureus or S. pneumoniae. Clinical severity was associated with the zinc ABC transporter and DNA repair genes in S. pneumoniae and cell wall proteins (biofilm formation, antibiotic and complement permeability) in S. aureus via WGS. Conclusion: FT-IR warrants further clinical evaluation as a promising diagnostic tool.
We tested a technique (FT-IR) to identify four different, common bacteria from 104 children with serious infections and compared it to lab methods for diagnosis. FT-IR was more accurate. We tested if it could identify subtypes of bacteria, which is important in outbreaks. It was able to subtype two species, but not the two other species. However, it is a much faster and cheaper technique than the gold standard. It may be useful in certain outbreaks. We also investigated the trends between genes and the length of hospital stay. This can support further laboratory research. As a fast, low-cost test, FT-IR warrants further testing before it is applied to clinical labs.