Is off-label thrombolysis safe and effective in a real-life primary stroke center? A retrospective analysis of data from a 5-year prospective database.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) varies among countries, partly due to guidelines and product labeling changes. The study aim was to identify the characteristics of patients with AIS treated with off-label IVT and to determine its safety when performed in a primary stroke center (PSC). METHODS: This observational, single-center study included all consecutive patients admitted to Perpignan PSC for AIS and treated with IVT and patients transferred for EVT, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. Data of patients treated with IVT according to ("in-label group") or outside ("off-label") the initial guidelines and manufacturer's product specification were compared. Safety was assessed using symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SIH) as the main adverse event. RESULTS: Among the 892 patients in the database (834 screened by MRI, 93.5%), 746 were treated by IVT: 185 (24.8%) "in-label" and 561 (75.2%) "off-label". In the "off-label" group, 316 (42.4% of the cohort) had a single criterion for "off-label" use, 197 (26.4%) had two, and 48 (6.4%) had three or more criteria, without any difference in IVT safety pattern among them. SIH rates were comparable between the "off-label" and "in-label" groups (2.7% vs. 1.1%, P=0.21); early neurological deterioration and systematic adverse event due to IVT treatment were similar in the 2 groups. "Off-label" patients had higher in-hospital (8.7% vs. 3.8%, P=0.05) and 3-month mortality rates (12.1% vs 5.4%, P<0.01), but this is explained by confounding factors as they were older (76 vs 67 years, P<0.0001) and more dependent (median modified Rankin scale score 0.4 vs 0.1, P<0.0001) at admission. CONCLUSIONS: "Off-label" thrombolysis for AIS seems to be safe and effective in the routine setting of a primary stroke center.

Different clinical outcomes between cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation and non-inflammatory form.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-ri) is a rare manifestation related to CAA, thought to be more severe. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of CAA-ri and non-inflammatory CAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients with CAA-ri from 13 French centers. We constituted a sex- and age-matched control cohort with non-inflammatory CAA and similar disease duration. Survival, autonomy and cognitive evolution were compared after logistic regression. Cerebral microbleeds (CMB), intracerebral hemorrhage, cortical superficial siderosis and hippocampal atrophy were analyzed as well as CSF biomarker profile and APOE genotype when available. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Data from 48 CAA-ri patients including 28 already reported and 20 new patients were analyzed. Over a mean of 3.1 years, 11 patients died (22.9%) and 18 (37.5%) relapsed. CAA-ri patients were more frequently institutionalized than non-inflammatory CAA patients (30% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001); mortality rates remained similar. MMSE and modified Rankin scale scores showed greater severity in CAA-ri at last follow-up. MRI showed a higher number of CMB at baseline and last follow-up in CAA-ri (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). CSF showed lower baseline levels of Aß42 in CAA-ri than non-inflammatory CAA (373.3 pg/ml vs 490.8 pg/ml, p = 0.05). CAA-ri patients more likely carried at least one APOE ε4 allele (76% vs 37.5%, adjusted p = 0.05) particularly as homozygous status (56% vs 6.2%, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: CAA-ri appears to be more severe than non-inflammatory CAA with a significant loss of autonomy and global higher amyloid burden, shown by more CMB and a distinct CSF profile. This burden may be partially promoted by ε4 allele.

Results of a 1-year quality-improvement process to reduce door-to-needle time in acute ischemic stroke with MRI screening.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a 1-year quality-improvement (QI) process to reduce door-to-needle (DTN) time in a secondary general hospital in which multimodal MRI screening is used before tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: The QI process was initiated in January 2015. Patients who received intravenous (iv) tPA<4.5h after AIS onset between 26 February 2015 to 25 February 2016 (during implementation of the QI process; the "2015 cohort") were identified (n=130), and their demographic and clinical characteristics and timing metrics compared with those of patients treated by iv tPA in 2014 (the "2014 cohort", n=135). RESULTS: Of the 130 patients in the 2015 cohort, 120 (92.3%) of them were screened by MRI. The median DTN time was significantly reduced by 30% (from 84min in 2014 to 59min; P<0.003), while the proportion of treated patients with a DTN time≤60min increased from 21% to 52% (P<0.0001). Demographic and baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between cohorts, and the improvement in DTN time was associated with better outcomes after discharge (patients with a 0-2 score on the modified rankin scale: 59% in the 2015 cohort vs 42.4% in the 2014 cohort; P<0.01). During the 1-year QI process, the median DTN time decreased by 15% (from 65min in the first trimester to 55min in the last trimester; P≤0.04) with a non-significant 1.5-fold increase in the proportion of treated patients with a DTN time≤60min (from 41% to 62%; P=0.09). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to deliver tPA to patients with AIS within 60min in a general hospital, using MRI as the routine screening modality, making this QI process to reduce DTN time widely applicable to other secondary general hospitals.