Does tranexamic acid effectively minimise blood loss in cleft palate repair? A rigorous assessment through comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cleft palate repair is a common reconstructive procedure that can involve significant blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proposed to minimise blood loss during various surgical procedures, but its effectiveness in cleft palate repair remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of TXA to reduce postoperative blood loss. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published up to September 2023. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes measured were total blood loss, transfusion rates, and postoperative complications. We identified four relevant RCTs, which included 275 cleft palate patients with a mean (range) age of 28.7 (6-65) months. The pooled analysis found no significant difference in duration of surgery (MD -18.40 minutes, p = 0.09), preoperative haemoglobin (MD 0.46 g/dl, p = 0.27), or postoperative haemoglobin (MD 0.07 g/dl, p = 0.86) between TXA and control groups. Intraoperative blood loss was lower with TXA, but with TXA, the difference was not statistically significant (MD -16.63 ml, p = 0.15). TXA significantly improved surgical field visibility (p = 0.004). No adverse events occurred with its use. While no significant differences were found in surgical outcomes with TXA, surgical field visibility significantly improved, and TXA showed a promising safety profile. Larger and higher-quality RCTs are still needed to validate these preliminary findings before TXA can be considered as a standard treatment.

Comprehensive Analysis of Current Treatment Approaches for Keloids in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review.

Keloids, benign fibrous growths resulting from atypical skin responses to injuries, present a complex challenge in dermatology. These lesions, characterized by excessive collagen production, often lead to physical discomfort and psychological distress. While various treatment methods exist, the lack of a universally effective modality underscores the need for a systematic evaluation of current approaches. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze the current available treatment modalities used for the management of keloids in the pediatric population in terms of their effectiveness, safety, and quality of life outcomes. The review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies published in English. The review specifically focused on randomized controlled trials involving patients under 18 diagnosed with keloids, assessing different treatment modalities, and reporting validated measures of treatment efficacy, safety outcomes, and quality of life. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool for randomized studies to ensure the methodological quality of the included trials. Four studies met the inclusion criteria, collectively involving 196 pediatric patients. Treatment interventions included glucocorticosteroid and fusidic acid cream with silicone gel patches, botulinum toxin type A injections, and Scarban silicone gel sheets. Patient-reported outcomes exhibited varying degrees of improvement in scar size, vascularity, and pliability. Complications, such as rash and wound infection, were reported in some cases. Based on our review of the selected studies and due to the incompletely understood pathogenesis of keloids, there is an ongoing lack of universally effective treatment modality for the management of keloids resulting in their persistently high recurrence rate.