Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vasc Health Risk Manag ; 18: 397-406, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35698640

ABSTRACT

Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia (BiVT) is a rare form of ventricular tachycardia that manifests on surface electrocardiogram by dual QRS morphologies alternating on a beat-to-beat basis. It was first reported in the 1920s as a complication of digoxin, and since then, it has been reported in other conditions including fulminant myocarditis, sarcoidosis, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and Andersen-Tawil syndrome. The mechanism for BiVT is not as well known as other forms of ventricular tachycardia but appears to include typical mechanisms including triggered activity from afterdepolarizations, abnormal automaticity, or reentry. This review will go beyond the definition, surface electrocardiogram, mechanisms, causes, and treatment of BiVT as per our current understanding.


Subject(s)
Andersen Syndrome , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Andersen Syndrome/complications , Electrocardiography/adverse effects , Humans , Tachycardia , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy
2.
Int J Med Educ ; 8: 292-296, 2017 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28829331

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess learning approaches of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd-year medical students by using revised two-factor study process questionnaire, and to assess reliability and validity of the questionnaire. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 2014. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) was completed by 610 medical students of both genders, from foundation (first year), central nervous system (second year), medicine and surgery (third year) courses. The study process was evaluated by computing mean scores of two research study approaches (deep & surface) using student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance. The internal consistency and construct validity of the questionnaire were assessed using Cronbach's α and factor analysis. RESULTS: The mean score of deep approach was significantly higher than the surface approach among participants(t(770)=7.83, p= 0.000) for the four courses. The mean scores of deep approach were significantly higher among participants with higher grade point average (F(2,768)=13.31, p=0.001) along with more number of study hours by participants (F(2,768)=20.08, p=0.001). The Cronbach's α-values of items at 0.70 indicate the good internal consistency of questionnaire used. Factor analysis confirms two factors (deep and surface approaches) of R-SPQ-2F. CONCLUSIONS: The deep approach to learning was the primary approach among 1st, 2nd and 3rd-year King Saud University medical students. This study confirms reliability and validity of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire. Medical educators could use the results of such studies to make required changes in the curriculum.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Sectional Studies , Curriculum , Educational Measurement , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Learning , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Saudi Arabia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...