Evaluation of the Truncated Cone-Rhomboid Pyramid Formula for Simplified Right Ventricular Quantification: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study.

Background/Objective: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference method for right ventricular (RV) volume and function analysis, but time-consuming manual segmentation and corrections of imperfect automatic segmentations are needed. This study sought to evaluate the applicability of an echocardiographically established truncated cone-rhomboid pyramid formula (CPF) for simplified RV quantification using CMR. Methods: A total of 70 consecutive patients assigned to RV analysis using CMR were included. As standard method, the manual contouring of RV-short axis planes was performed for the measurement of end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). Additionally, two linear measurements in four-chamber views were obtained in systole and diastole: basal diameters at the level of tricuspid valve (Dd and Ds) and baso-apical lengths from the center of tricuspid valve to the RV apex (Ld and Ls) were measured for the calculation of RV-EDV = 1.21 × Dd2 × Ld and RV-ESV = 1.21 × Ds 2 × Ls using CPF. Results: RV volumes using CPF were slightly higher than those using standard CMR analysis (RV-EDV index: 86.2 ± 29.4 mL/m2 and RV-ESV index: 51.5 ± 22.5 mL/m2 vs. RV-EDV index: 81.7 ± 24.1 mL/m2 and RV-ESV index: 44.5 ± 23.2 mL/m2) and RV-EF was lower (RV-EF: 41.1 ± 13.5% vs. 48.4 ± 13.7%). Both methods had a strong correlation of RV volumes (ΔRV-EDV index = -4.5 ± 19.0 mL/m2; r = 0.765, p < 0.0001; ΔRV-ESV index = -7.0 ± 14.4 mL/m2; r = 0.801, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Calculations of RV volumes and function using CPF assuming the geometrical model of a truncated cone-rhomboid pyramid anatomy of RV is feasible, with a strong correlation to measurements using standard CMR analysis, and only two systolic and diastolic linear measurements in four-chamber views are needed.

Transcatheter mitral valve repair is feasible and effective in oldest-old patients: results from real-world cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) using MitraClip® devices in oldest-old patients compared to younger patients. METHODS: The study retrospectively included 340 consecutive patients who underwent TMVR. Patients were classified according to age into the oldest-old (age ≥ 85 years) patient group or the younger (age < 85 years) patient group. Immediate results of the procedure, intrahospital outcomes and one-year outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Oldest-old patients represented 15.9% (n = 54) of all patients. Procedure success was comparable for the oldest-old patient group and the younger patient group (92.6% vs. 95.8%, P = 0.30), and there was no difference in intrahospital mortality (9.2% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.12). At a one-year follow-up (interquartile range: 6-16 months), there was no significant difference in rehospitalization due to decompensated heart failure (25.5% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.24) or all-cause mortality (29.8% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.26) between the oldest-old patient group and the younger patient group. In patients with available echocardiographic follow-up, severity of residual mitral regurgitation was also comparable between the oldest-old patient group and the younger patient group. CONCLUSIONS: TMVR seems to be feasible and effective in oldest-old patients and should be considered for oldest-old patients presenting with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation and high surgical risk.

Outcome of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with diabetes mellitus: Results from a real-world cohort.

BACKGROUND: There are only limited data on patients with diabetes undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in real-world settings. Previous data indicated patients with diabetes to have a worse prognosis. This study sought to evaluate safety and efficacy of TEER in patients with diabetes in a real-world cohort. METHODS: In this monocentric study 340 consecutive patients with severe primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing TEER were included. Immediate results of the procedure, intrahospital and one-year outcome were compared between patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 109 patients (32%). Patients with diabetes were younger (77 y (71, 81) vs. 79 y (74, 83); p = 0.003), had more often ischemic cardiomyopathy (68% vs. 48%; p<0.001), previous coronary-artery bypass graft (35% vs. 20%; p = 0.002) and arterial hypertension (89% vs. 75%; p<0.001) compared to those without diabetes. Baseline NYHA class, type of MR (primary vs. secondary), left ventricular dimensions and function (ejection fraction: 37% (28, 50) vs. 40% (29, 55); p = 0.10) as well as severity of MR were not different between both groups. Success of the procedure (95% vs. 95%; p = 0.84), intrahospital mortality (5.5% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.98) and one-year follow-up regarding all-cause mortality (24.2% vs. 23.0%; p = 0.72), hospitalization for heart failure (37.4% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.23), NYHA class (p = 0.14) or MR severity (p = 0.59) did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data suggest that TEER seems to be similarly safe and effective in patients with severe MR and diabetes compared to those without diabetes.

Safety and efficacy of transcatheter mitral valve repair in patients with COPD; results from real-world cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BACKGROUND: Heart failure and COPD share many clinical features and commonly coexist. Data about the safety and efficacy of TMVR in patients with COPD is not conclusive. METHODS: Three hundred and forty consecutive patients undergoing TMVR were retrospectively included. COPD diagnosis was based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Intra-hospital, 30-day- and 1-year outcomes were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients had COPD (24%). There was no difference in intra-hospital mortality between patients with and without COPD (both 5%, p = 0.95). Among patients who had a successful procedure and survived to discharge there was a trend toward more rehospitalization due to decompensated heart failure at 30-day follow-up in patients with COPD (12.9% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.08) with no difference in mortality. At median follow-up of 1 year, New York heart association (NYHA) category was comparable among both groups and there was no significant difference in rehospitalization (COPD: 29.9% vs. non-COPD: 34%, p = 0.5). There was a trend toward increased 1-year mortality in COPD patients (31.2% vs. 20.6%, p = 0.06). However, a composite endpoint of rehospitalization or death at 1 year did not differ between both groups (48% vs. 42.5%, p = 0.4). Regression analysis showed no correlation between COPD severity and worse TMVR outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: COPD is highly prevalent among patients undergoing TMVR. However, TMVR seems to be safe and effective in COPD patients. COPD severity and PFT impairment alone should not be considered as a contraindication for TMVR.

Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Using Impella Ventricular Assist Device Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is nowadays the optimal therapeutic strategy in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). Consequently, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of concomitant complex coronary artery disease (CAD) has increased in the last decade to optimize patients with severe AS before TAVI. Although the Impella ventricular assist device (Abiomed) was considered as a relative contraindication in patients with AS, its usage has demonstrated promising results in selected patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent staged approach with high-risk PCI of unprotected left main (ULM) using the Impella ventricular assist device before TAVI were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoints were peri-interventional mortality, vascular complication, and 30-day stroke rates. Due to the exploratory, observational intent of the study, no statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-one consecutive patients (14 men; age, 80 ± 6 years; log EuroScore, 17 ± 7; SYNTAX score, 27 ± 10) were included. All patients (21/21) survived to 30-day follow-up exam. Three patients (14%) had PCI of ULM and TAVI at the same session. Eighteen patients (86%) underwent TAVI in a staged approach after previous PCI (10 ± 10 days). No patient suffered from stroke up to 30-day follow-up. One patient (5%) developed Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 major vascular complication after PCI. TAVI was successfully performed in all patients. CONCLUSION: Temporary hemodynamic support with the Impella device during staged approach with high-risk protected PCI appears to be safe and technically feasible in patients with severe AS before undergoing TAVI.

Incidence and clinical relevance of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) requires transseptal puncture and results in iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD). The impact of persistent iASD was previously investigated. However, data were diverse and inconclusive. 53 patients who underwent MITRACLIP were retrospectively included. Based on the presence of iASD in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after 6 months, patients were divided in two groups (iASD group vs. non-iASD group). Impact of iASD on outcome at 6 months and at two years was evaluated. Persistent iASD was detected in 62% of patients. Independent predictors for persistent iASD were female gender and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. At 6-month follow-up, there was no difference in reduction of NYHA class (ΔNYHA = 1.3 ± 1 in iASD group vs. 0.9 ± 1 in non-iASD group, p = 0.171). There was a significant difference in right ventricular end diastolic diameter (RVEDd) (42 ± 8 mm in iASD-group vs. 39 ± 4 mm in non-iASD group, p = 0.047). However, right ventricular systolic function (TAPSE) (14 ± 7 mm in iASD group vs. 16 ± 8 mm in non-iASD group, p = 0.176) and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) (40 ± 12 mmHg in iASD group vs. 35 ± 10 mmHg in non-iASD group, p = 0.136) were still comparable between both groups. At 2 years follow-up, there was no significant difference regarding rate of rehospitalization (24% vs 15%, p = 0.425) or mortality (12% vs 10%, p = 0.941) between both groups. Incidence of persistent iASD after MITRACLIP is markedly high. Despite the increase in right ventricular diameter in patients with persistent iASD, these patients were not clinically compromised compared to patients without persistent iASD.