Communication and information sharing with pediatric patients including refugees with advanced cancer, their caregivers, and health care professionals in Jordan: a qualitative study.

Introduction: Effective communication in pediatric palliative cancer care is an important aspect of practice to enhance patient- and family-centered care, and to optimize decision-making. However, little is known about communication preferences practices from the perspectives of children, caregivers and their health care professionals (HCPs) in the Middle Eastern region. Furthermore, involving children in research is crucial but limited. This study aimed to describe the communication and information-sharing preferences and practices of children with advanced cancer, their caregivers, and health care professionals in Jordan. Methods: A qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted using semi-structured face to face interviews with three groups of stakeholders (children, caregivers and HCPs). Purposive sampling recruited a diverse sample from inpatient and outpatient settings at a tertiary cancer center in Jordan. Procedures were in line with the Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) reporting guidelines. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analyzed. Findings: Fifty-two stakeholders participated: 43 Jordanian and 9 refugees (25 children, 15 caregivers and 12 HCPs). Four major themes emerged: 1) Hiding information between the three stakeholders which includes parents who hide the information from their sick children and ask the HCPs to do so to protect the child from distressful emotions and children who hide their suffering from their parents to protect them from being sad; 2) Communication and sharing of clinical versus non-clinical information; 3) Preferred communication styles such as use of a companionate approach by acknowledging patients and caregivers' suffering, building a trustful relationship, proactive information sharing, considering child age and medical status, parents as facilitators in communication, and patients' and caregivers' health literacy; 4) Communication and information sharing with refugees where they had dialect issues, which hindered effective communication. Some refugees had unrealistically high expectations regarding their child's care and prognosis, which posed challenges to communication with staff. Discussion: The novel findings of this study should inform better child-centered practices and better engage them in their care decisions. This study has demonstrated children's ability to engage in primary research and to express preferences, and parents' ability to share views on this sensitive topic.

Concerns and priority outcomes for children with advanced cancer and their families in the Middle East: A cross-national qualitative study.

Introduction: Palliative care access is limited in the Middle-East, with few specialist centers and forcibly displaced migrants facing additional struggles to access care. Little is known about the specificities of providing palliative care to children and young people (CYP) with cancer. They are rarely asked directly their concerns and needs, which limits the provision of quality patient-centered care. Our study aims to identify the concerns and needs of CYP with advanced cancer and their families, in Jordan and Turkey. Method: A qualitative cross-national study in Jordan and Turkey with framework analysis was conducted two pediatric cancer centers in Jordan and Turkey. In each country, 25 CYP, 15 caregivers and 12 healthcare professionals participated (N=104). Most caregivers (70%) and healthcare professionals (75%) were women. Results: We identified five areas of concern: (1) Physical pain and other symptoms (e.g. mobility, fatigue); (2) Psychological concerns and needs (e.g. anger, psychological changes); (3) Spirituality, uncertainty over the future and use of "Tawakkul" (e.g. use of religion as a coping mechanism); (4) Negative impact on social life (e.g. social isolation, loss of support); (5) Burden on caregiver and their families (e.g. financial issues, siblings left behind). Psychological concerns were a priority for both CYPs and caregivers (particularly for refugee and displaced families) but often overlooked during routine care. CYP were able to share their own concerns and care priorities. Conclusions: Advanced cancer care must ensure assessment and management of concerns across the concerns identified. Developing child- and family-centered outcomes would ensure monitoring the quality of care. Spirituality had a more important role compared to similar investigation in other regions.

Safety and Cost-effectiveness of Outpatient Administration of High-dose Chemotherapy in Children With Ewing Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Children with Ewing sarcoma (ES) are subjected to an interval-compressed regimen with cycles of chemotherapy given every 2 weeks, which is nowadays considered to be the standard of care for individuals with such a case. We developed institutional clinical practice guidelines (CPG) applying outpatient administration in regard to this regimen. This study intends to evaluate our institutional experience with this regimen. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with ES who were treated using interval-compressed protocol of 14 cycles consisting of alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine (VDC) and ifosfamide, etoposide (IE) with a maximum dose of doxorubicin of 375 mg/m. Cycles were subsequently followed by G-CSF administration until count recovery was recorded. Patients treated using our guidelines from June 2013 to June 2015 were eligible for these guidelines. Patients younger than 3 years at the time of diagnosis were not eligible for outpatient administration of chemotherapy. RESULTS: In total 12 patients with localized ES or lung-only metastasis were eligible. By the time of analysis, 153 cycles were administered to these patients. Eight cycles for 6 patients were administered on an inpatient basis while the rest (N=145) were administered in the outpatient chemotherapy unit. The median number of cycles per patient were 14 (with a range of 5 to 14). Ninety cycles (59%) were administered on time per CPG. The median interval between these cycles were 16 days (range, 12 to 36 days). The median interval between induction and consolidation cycles were 14 and 17 days, respectively. Neutropenia was reported at the time of each next cycle for 12 cycles. Transient gross hematuria was reported in 1 patient only. In addition, a cost saving of 21% (approximately US$ 4500) were achieved per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the outpatient administration of interval-compressed regimen is safe and associated with acceptable adherence to this regimen.