Assessment of the Omius™ cooling headband effectiveness during a 70-min submaximal running effort followed by a 5-km time-trial in hot/humid conditions.

Exercise performed under hot/humid conditions can hinder endurance performance. The Omius™ headband (OH) is purported to reduce the perception of heat and improve performance. We examined the impact of OH on selected thermal and cardiovascular functions, subjective perceptions and running performance. Using a randomized crossover protocol, 10 trained male athletes (28 ± 4 years) completed two trials (OH and sham headband (SH), 35.0 ± 0.3 °C, 56 ± 3% relative humidity) comprising 70 min of running (60% V˙ O2max) followed by a 5-km running time-trial (TT). Heart rate, perceived exertion and whole-body thermal comfort did not significantly differ between conditions during the submaximal running effort and TT. Rectal temperature was higher with OH (0.11 ± 0.16 °C, p = 0.052) than SH prior to the submaximal running effort, however, no significant differences were observed between conditions regarding the changes in rectal temperature from baseline during the submaximal running effort and TT. Forehead temperature was significantly lower with OH than SH during the submaximal running effort, but no significant differences were observed at the end of the TT. Scores of perceived forehead thermal comfort was only significantly lower with OH than SH during the submaximal running effort. TT performance did not significantly differ between OH (19.8 ± 1.2 min) and SH (20.2 ± 1.0 min). In conclusion, OH improves forehead thermal comfort and reduces forehead temperature but not rectal temperature, heart rate and perceived exertion during, nor 5-km TT performance following, 70 min of submaximal running in the heat.

Repeatability of Ad Libitum Water Intake during Repeated 1 h Walking/Jogging Exercise Sessions Conducted under Hot Ambient Conditions.

A drinking strategy aiming to replace a given percentage of the sweat losses incurred during exercise should result in reproducible fluid intake volume and, hence, fluid balance from one exercise session to the other performed under similar scenarios. Whether this may also be the case with ad libitum drinking during exercise is unclear. We characterized the repeatability of ad libitum water intake during repeated 1 h exercise sessions and examined its effect over time on fluid balance and selected physiological functions and perceptual sensations. Twelve (3 women) healthy individuals participated in this study. At weekly intervals, they completed four 2 × 30 min walking/jogging exercise bouts (55% V˙O2max, 40 °C, 20-30% relative humidity) interspersed by a 3 min recovery period. During exercise, participants consumed water (20 °C) ad libitum. There were no significant differences among the four exercise sessions for absolute water intake volume (~1000 mL·h-1), percent body mass loss (~0.4%), sweat rate (~1300 mL·h-1) and percent of sweat loss replaced by water intake (~80%). Heart rate, rectal temperature, and perceived thirst and heat stress did not differ significantly between the first and fourth exercise sessions. Perceived exertion was significantly lower during the fourth vs. the first exercise session, but the difference was trivial (<1 arbitrary unit). In conclusion, ad libitum water intake during four successive identical 1 h walking/jogging sessions conducted in the heat will result in similar water intake volumes and perturbations in fluid balance, heart rate, rectal temperature, and perceived thirst, heat stress and exertion.