Global environmental and toxicological impacts of polybrominated diphenyl ethers versus organophosphate esters: A comparative analysis and regrettable substitution dilemma.

The prevalence of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in the global environment is increasing, which aligns with the decline in the usage of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). PBDEs, a category of flame retardants, were banned and classified as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) through the Stockholm Convention due to their toxic and persistent properties. Despite a lack of comprehensive understanding of their ecological and health consequences, OPEs were adopted as replacements for PBDEs. This research aims to offer a comparative assessment of PBDEs and OPEs in various domains, specifically focusing on their persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity (PBT) properties. This study explored physicochemical properties (such as molecular weight, octanol-water partition coefficient, octanol-air partition coefficient, Henry's law constant, and vapor pressures), environmental behaviors, global concentrations in environmental matrices (air, water, and soil), toxicities, bioaccumulation, and trophic transfer mechanisms of both groups of compounds. Based on the comparison and analysis of environmental and toxicological data, we evaluate whether OPEs represent another instance of regrettable substitution and global contamination as much as PBDEs. Our findings indicate that the physical and chemical characteristics, environmental behaviors, and global concentrations of PBDEs and OPEs, are similar and overlap in many instances. Notably, OPE concentrations have even surged by orders of several magnitude compared to PBDEs in certain pristine regions like the Arctic and Antarctic, implying long-range transport. In many instances, air and water concentrations of OPEs have been increased than PBDEs. While the bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) of PBDEs (ranging from 4.8 to 7.5) are slightly elevated compared to OPEs (-0.5 to 5.36) in aquatic environments, both groups of compounds exhibit BAF values beyond the threshold of 5000 L/kg (log10 BAF > 3.7). Similarly, the trophic magnification factors (TMFs) for PBDEs (ranging from 0.39 to 4.44) slightly surpass those for OPEs (ranging from 1.06 to 3.5) in all cases. Metabolic biotransformation rates (LogKM) and hydrophobicity are potentially major factors deciding their trophic magnification potential. However, many compounds of PBDEs and OPEs show TMF values higher than 1, indicating biomagnification potential. Collectively, all data suggest that PBDEs and OPEs have the potential to bioaccumulate and transfer through the food chain. OPEs and PBDEs present a myriad of toxicity endpoints, with notable overlaps encompassing reproductive issues, oxidative stress, developmental defects, liver dysfunction, DNA damage, neurological toxicity, reproductive anomalies, carcinogenic effects, and behavior changes. Based on our investigation and comparative analysis, we conclude that substituting PBDEs with OPEs is regrettable based on PBT properties, underscoring the urgency for policy reforms and effective management strategies. Addressing this predicament before an exacerbation of global contamination is imperative.

Repurposing of approved drugs for targeting CDK4/6 and aromatase protein using molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies.

Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with the highest incidence among women. Among the various subtypes of breast cancer, estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) is the most diagnosed. Estrogen upregulates cyclin D1, which in turn promotes the activity of CDK4/6 and facilitates cell cycle progression. To address this, the first-line treatment for ER+ breast cancer focuses on inhibiting estrogen production by targeting aromatase, the enzyme responsible for the rate-limiting step in estrogen synthesis. Thus, combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with aromatase inhibitors has emerged as a crucial treatment strategy for this type of breast cancer. This approach effectively suppresses estrogen biosynthesis and controls uncontrolled cell proliferation, significantly improving overall survival rates and delayed disease progression. This study aimed to identify compounds that are likely to inhibit CDK4/6 and aromatase simultaneously by using a structure-based drug design strategy. 12,432 approved and investigational drugs were prepared and docked into the active site of CDK6 using HTVS and XP docking modes of Glide resulting in 277 compounds with docking scores ≤ -7 kcal/mol. These compounds were docked into aromatase enzyme using XP mode to give seven drugs with docking scores≤ -6.001 kcal/mol. Furthermore, the shortlisted drugs were docked against CDK4 showing docking scores ranging from -3.254 to -8.254 kcal/mol. Moreover, MM-GBSA for the top seven drugs was calculated. Four drugs, namely ellagic acid, carazolol, dantron, and apomorphine, demonstrated good binding affinity to all three protein targets CDK4/6 and aromatase. Specifically, they exhibited favourable binding free energy with CDK6, with values of -51.92, -53.90, -50.22, and -60.97 kcal/mol, respectively. Among these drugs, apomorphine displayed the most favourable binding free energy with all three protein targets. To further evaluate the stability of the interaction, apomorphine was subjected to a 100 ns molecular dynamics simulation with CDK6. The results indicated the formation of a stable ligand-protein complex. While the results obtained from the MM-GBSA calculation of the binding free energies of the MD conformations of apomorphine showed less favourable binding free energy compared to that obtained post-docking. All these computational findings will provide better structural insight for the development of CDK4/6 and aromatase multi-target inhibitors.