Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Saudi Med J ; 41(8): 883-886, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32789431

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of emergency department (ED) waiting time estimate provision on the satisfaction of patients.  Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between September 2017 and May 2018. It included 18 to 70 years old Arabic-speaking acute care patients. After being divided into 2 groups, the intervention group alone was provided waiting time estimates. Both groups answered 2 questionnaires evaluating their satisfaction and illness perception before and after seeing a doctor. Results: One-hundred patients were included. No significant difference found in waiting time satisfaction scores between groups (intervention (5.92/10±3.13), control (5.45/10±3.38), p=0.476). Demographics and illness perception had an insignificant impact on satisfaction. Waiting time estimate was preferred by most participants (70%). Conclusion: Providing waiting time estimation did not affect satisfaction but was preferred to have in the ED by most.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Time Perception , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Waiting Lists , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Young Adult
2.
Saudi Med J ; 41(7): 698-702, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32601636

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter (USG-CVC) placement rate of emergency physicians (EPs) in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study regarding the respondents' demographic profiles, formal and informal training in USG-CVC placement, experiences, and attitudes towards the procedure was emailed to all EPs registered with the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) between October and December 2018. RESULTS: In total, 234/350 SCFHS-registered EPs completed the survey; the response rate was 66.9%. Most respondents (70.5%) were board-certified in emergency medicine (EM). Ninety percent indicated that US device for CVC placement assistance was available. Most EPs (78.2%) had performed USG-CVC placement; the US usage rate correlated significantly with recent graduation from residency (p=0.048). In total, 83.3% received formal training during residency. Of the 234 respondents, 53.8% felt extremely comfortable with CVC placement with USG and 19.7% without USG (p less than 0.01). Nevertheless, most respondents desired further USG-CVC training. CONCLUSION: Despite existing evidence and a consensus on its superiority over the landmark technique, USG-CVC placement has not been adopted by a small proportion of EPs into clinical practice. Formal training, education, and institutional provision of permanent onsite US machines may address any barriers.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheterization, Central Venous/statistics & numerical data , Central Venous Catheters , Emergency Medicine , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Physicians , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/education , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Emerg Med ; 48(2): 137-42, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25440860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence to guide physicians on management of patients who sustain head injuries while on warfarin. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the rate of intracranial bleeding in anticoagulated patients with minor and minimal head injuries and the association with clinical features and international normalized ratio (INR). METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study of adult patients, taking warfarin, at two tertiary care emergency departments over 2 years with minor (Glasgow Coma Score 13-15, with loss of consciousness, amnesia, or confusion) or minimal (Glasgow Coma Score 15 without loss of consciousness, amnesia, or confusion) head injuries. Patients with penetrating injuries, INR < 1.5, or a new focal neurological deficit were excluded. Our outcome, intracranial bleeding, was determined by the radiologist's final computed tomography (CT) report for imaging performed within 2 weeks. RESULTS: There were 176 patients enrolled, of which 157 (89.2%) had CT and 28 (15.9%) had intracranial bleeding. Comparing patients with and without intracranial bleeding found no significant differences in INR, and loss of consciousness was associated with higher rate of intracranial bleeding. The rate of intracranial bleeding in the minor and minimal head injury groups was 21.9% and 4.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of intracranial bleeding in patients on warfarin is considerable. Loss of consciousness is associated with high rates of intracranial bleeding. This study supports a low threshold for ordering CT scans for anticoagulated patients with head injuries.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Intracranial Hemorrhages/epidemiology , Warfarin/adverse effects , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Intracranial Hemorrhages/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...