Consensus on diagnosis and management of Hereditary Angioedema in the Middle East: A Delphi initiative.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE), a potentially life-threatening genetic disorder due to C1 inhibitor deficiency in most cases, is characterized by sudden and/or recurrent attacks of angioedema (subcutaneous/submucosal swellings). The global World Allergy Organization (WAO)/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) International guideline for HAE management is comprehensive, but the implementation of this guideline may require regional adaptation considering the diversity in disease awareness, type of medical care systems, and access to diagnostics and treatment. The aim of this Delphi initiative was to build on the global guideline and provide regional adaptation to address the concerns and specific needs in the Middle East. Methods: The Consensus panel comprised 13 experts from the Middle East (3 from the United Arab Emirates, 3 from Saudi Arabia, 2 from Lebanon, 2 from Kuwait, 2 from Oman and 1 from Qatar) who have more than 2 decades of experience in allergy and immunology and are actively involved in managing HAE patients. The process that was carried out to reach the consensus recommendation included: 1.) A systematic literature review for articles related to HAE management using Ovid MEDLINE. 2.) The development of a questionnaire by an internationally acclaimed expert, with 10 questions specific to HAE management in the Middle East. 3.) Experts received the questionnaire via email individually and their answers were recorded (email/interview). 4.) A virtual consensus meeting was organized to discuss the questionnaire, make amends if needed, vote, and achieve consensus. Results: The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, each with 2 or more statements/recommendations on which the regional experts voted. A consensus was reached based on a 70% agreement between the participants. The key highlights include: 1) HAE experts in the Middle East emphasized the importance of a positive family history for arriving at a diagnosis of HAE. 2) The number of episodes per month or per 6-month period and severity should be used, together with other markers, to determine the need for prophylaxis. 3) Disease status should be monitored by periodic visits and the use of patient-reported outcome measures such as the angioedema activity score and the angioedema control test. 4) Attenuated androgens and tranexamic acid may be considered for long-term prophylaxis, if lanadelumab, C1-Inhibitor or berotralstat are not available. Conclusion: This consensus recommendation may help to educate healthcare practitioners in the Middle East and unify their approach to the diagnosis and management of HAE.

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Hereditary Angioedema in Saudi Arabia.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a potentially life-threatening autosomal dominant disorder affecting roughly 1:50,000 individuals. It is commonly characterized by swelling of the larynx, gastrointestinal tract, extremities, and skin. There is growing genetic heterogeneity associated with this disease but more than 95% of mutations are found in SERPING1, the gene which encodes complement 1 inhibitor (C1-INH). HAE cohorts from several populations have been published but no large scale study has been reported from the Arab world to date. Here we document the clinical and genetic findings of HAE patients from a single Saudi institution, which is a major referral center at the national level. A total of 51 patients across 17 unrelated families were recruited including two large multi-generational families, of which one contained an in-frame exonic deletion that was resolved through MLPA. Two cases were negative for all the genes we tested (including F12, PLG, ANGPT1, MYOF, KNG1, and HS3ST6). The predominant HAE subtype in our cohort was type I, at 76%. We were able to uncover a mutation in 49 patients (96%). No type III (normal C1-INH) patients were encountered in the clinic, suggesting that this subtype does not play a major role in HAE pathogenesis in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, the existence of four patients with consistently normal complement 4 (C4) levels alongside abnormal C1-INH profiles highlights the utility of dual screening for both proteins in suspected patients.

Assessment of pain in patients with primary immune deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Primary immune deficiency (PID) patients may develop acute or chronic pain. Pain has not been studied in this population until now. OBJECTIVES: This study systematically assessed the pain of various durations in PID patients using validated pain questionnaires. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), already validated in the Arabic language, was used to ascertain the characteristics and severity of pain. Additionally, an Arabic version of the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (NPQ-SF) was employed to evaluate neuropathic pain in the same group of patients. RESULTS: Forty-six patients participated in the study. The mean age of the patients was 25 years. The most commonly diagnosed PID was a common variable immune deficiency (32.6%), followed by severe combined immune deficiency (19.57%). Based on the SF-MPQ, the pain was experienced by 30.4 % of the subjects who participated in the study; 57% of whom were on regular pain medications. The most common site reported for pain was the abdomen (35.7%). The mean duration of pain was 36.1 days ± 34.6 days. The most common comorbidities in these patients were bronchiectasis, followed by immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and scoliosis. None of the PID patients had significant neuropathic pain based on NFQ-SF. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the prevalence as well as the severity and duration of pain in PID patients. There were significantly more subjects who had continuous pain. Treatment of pain in PID patients will have a significant effect on improving their quality of life.