ABSTRACT
Blunt aortic injury (BAI) as a result of thoracic trauma is a rare entity in the adult and pediatric population. The endovascular approach has been the preferred method of management over operative repair in adults. However, data on pediatrics is limited to case reports and case series with no long-term follow-up. There are no current guidelines for management in the pediatric population. We are reporting a successful repair of a traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm in a 13 year old boy with covered stents, with a review of relevant literature.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Male , Adult , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/injuries , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/etiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aorta/surgery , Stents , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Thoracic Injuries/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Research quality in pediatric surgery has been challenged by multiple factors, including the low incidence of some congenital pathologies and rare event rates. With the rapid increase of pediatric surgical literature, there is a need for systematic reviews to synthesize evidence. It is important to assess the quality of these systematic reviews. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, using inguinal hernia repair as an index diagnosis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of interventions on inguinal hernia in the pediatric population. The quality reporting was assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tools. RESULTS: Of 1449 unique reports, 21 studies were included (15 meta-analyses and six systematic reviews). Median percent reported items for PRISMA and AMSTAR 2 were 72.2% and 70.5%, respectively. The least reported items in PRISMA were protocol registration (27.6%), synthesis of results (13.0%), and a risk of bias across studies (20.6%). For AMSTAR 2, the least reported items were reporting of source of funding (14.3%), appropriate methods for statistical combination of results (25.0%), and pre-establishment of protocol (28.6%). All critical items were completely or partially fulfilled in 5/21 (23.8%) of the studies and completely absent in 1/21 (4.8%) studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight relatively good reporting quality, yet a poor methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in the pediatric surgery literature on inguinal hernia management.
Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Abstracting and Indexing , Bias , Child , Hernia, Inguinal/diagnosis , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Humans , Research ReportABSTRACT
Congenital transmesenteric hernia in neonates is a rare cause of intestinal obstruction with devastating outcomes and still remains a challenge to diagnose pre-operatively. Patients are often managed with emergency surgical exploration and may need bowel resection. We present 2 neonates with small bowel obstruction secondary to strangulated transmesenteric hernia through a congenital defect in the small bowel mesentery, which were managed successfully. We have also reviewed the literature about congenital transmesenteric hernia in neonates.