Pooled Safety Analysis of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders in Adults.

The pooled incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were examined by indication using the integrated clinical database of Merz-sponsored, placebo-controlled, or repeat-dose studies of incobotulinumtoxinA in adults with cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, limb spasticity, sialorrhea, or essential tremor of the upper limb. Overall incidences of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, fatal TEAEs, TEAEs of special interest (TEAESIs; indicating possible toxin spread), and treatment-related (TR) events were determined for incobotulinumtoxinA and placebo after a single injection and for repeated dose cycles of incobotulinumtoxinA. The most frequent events after a single dose of incobotulinumtoxinA are summarized. After a single cycle, incidences of overall TEAEs were similar between incobotulinumtoxinA and the placebo in most indications, although between-indication differences were observed. Few TEAEs led to incobotulinumtoxinA discontinuation; there were no fatal TEAEs with incobotulinumtoxinA. In general, repeated cycles did not increase the incidence of any event. The most frequent TR-TEAEs were indication-dependent, including dysphagia for indications affecting the head or neck. The TR-TEAESIs across all indications were most commonly muscular weakness, dysphagia and dry mouth. Overall, the results of this pooled analysis support and extend the favorable safety and tolerability profile of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of adult neurological disorders established by individual clinical studies.

Pain Reduction in Cervical Dystonia Following Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA: A Pooled Analysis.

This analysis pooled pain severity data from four phase 3 and 4 studies of incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBoNT-A) for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD) in adults. CD-related pain severity was assessed at baseline, each injection visit, and 4 weeks after each injection of incoBoNT-A using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale pain severity subscale or a pain visual analog scale. Both were analyzed using a score range of 0-10 and pain was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. Data for 678 patients with pain at baseline were assessed and sensitivity analyses evaluated pain responses in the subgroup not taking concomitant pain medication (n = 384 at baseline). At Week 4 after the first injection, there was a mean change of -1.25 (standard deviation 2.04) points from baseline pain severity (p < 0.0001), with 48.1% showing ≥ 30% pain reduction from baseline, 34.4% showing ≥50% pain reduction from baseline, and 10.3% becoming pain free. Pain responses were sustained over five injection cycles with a trend to incremental improvements with each successive cycle. Pain responses in the subgroup not taking concomitant pain medication demonstrated the lack of confounding effects of pain medications. These results confirmed the pain relief benefits of long-term treatment with incoBoNT-A.

Spasticity-related pain in children/adolescents with cerebral palsy. Part 2: IncobotulinumtoxinA efficacy results from a pooled analysis.

PURPOSE: This pooled analysis of data from three Phase 3 studies investigated the effects of incobotulinumtoxinA on spasticity-related pain (SRP) in children/adolescents with uni-/bilateral cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Children/adolescents (ambulant and non-ambulant) were evaluated for SRP on increasingly difficult activities/tasks 4 weeks after each of four incobotulinumtoxinA injection cycles (ICs) using the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity (QPS; six modules specific to lower limb [LL] or upper limb [UL] spasticity and respondent type [child/adolescent, interviewer, or parent/caregiver]). IncobotulinumtoxinA doses were personalized, with all doses pooled for analysis. RESULTS: QPS key item responses were available from 331 and 155 children/adolescents with LL- and UL-spasticity, respectively, and 841/444 (LL/UL) of their parents/caregivers. IncobotulinumtoxinA efficacy was evident with the first IC. Efficacy was sustained and became more robust with further subsequent ICs. By Week 4 of the last (i.e. fourth) IC, 33.8-53.3% of children/adolescents reported complete SRP relief from their baseline pain for respective QPS items. Children/adolescents reported reductions in mean LL SRP intensity at levels that surpassed clinically meaningful thresholds. Similarly, parents/caregivers observed complete SRP relief and less frequent SRP with incobotulinumtoxinA. Similar results were found for UL SRP. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that incobotulinumtoxinA could bring considerable benefit to children/adolescents with spasticity by reducing SRP, even during strenuous activities.

Improvement in Quality-of-Life-Related Outcomes Following Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA in Adults with Limb Spasticity: A Pooled Analysis.

A strong correlation has been reported between patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and the investigator-rated Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) in patients with spasticity. The current analysis evaluates the effect of incobotulinumtoxinA on QoL-related outcomes (limb position abnormality, as well as dressing- and hygiene-related disability, measured with the DAS) in adults with upper limb spasticity, using pooled data from six studies. Separate analyses for each DAS domain were performed using data from patients with disabilities for that domain (DAS score ≥1). Results showed that a significantly greater proportion of incobotulinumtoxinA-treated compared with placebo-treated patients achieved a ≥1-point reduction from baseline in each of the DAS domains (improvement) 4 weeks after the first injection. The benefits of incobotulinumtoxinA were observed regardless of the baseline severity of DAS impairment and of the time elapsed since stroke. The effects of incobotulinumtoxinA 4 weeks after injection were maintained or enhanced over multiple injection cycles for all three DAS domains, supporting the use of repeated injection cycles to provide sustained QoL benefit. IncobotulinumtoxinA represents an important treatment option to achieve better QoL-related outcomes for patients with upper limb spasticity, irrespective of the duration of their condition.

Safety Profile and Lack of Immunogenicity of IncobotulinumtoxinA in Pediatric Spasticity and Sialorrhea: A Pooled Analysis.

IncobotulinumtoxinA, a pure botulinumtoxinA formulation, is free of accessory proteins. This analysis provides pooled safety data from phase 3 trials of children/adolescents (2-17 years), investigating incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of spasticity associated with cerebral palsy (at doses ≤20 U/kg (max. 500 U) per injection cycle (IC) for ≤6 ICs; three trials) or sialorrhea associated with neurologic disorders (at total doses of 20-75 U per IC for ≤4 ICs; one trial) for ≤96 weeks. Safety endpoints included the incidences of different types of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and immunogenicity. IncobotulinumtoxinA dose groups were combined. Of 1159 patients (mean age 7.3 years, 60.4% males) treated with incobotulinumtoxinA, 3.9% experienced treatment-related TEAEs, with the most common being injection site reactions (1.3%) (both indications), muscular weakness (0.7%) (spasticity), and dysphagia (0.2%) (sialorrhea). Two patients (0.2%) experienced a treatment-related treatment-emergent serious adverse event, and 0.3% discontinued the study due to treatment-related TEAEs. No botulinumtoxinA-naïve patients developed neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) after incobotulinumtoxinA. All children/adolescents with known pre-treatment status and testing positive for Nabs at final visit (n = 7) were previously treated with a botulinumtoxinA other than incobotulinumtoxinA. IncobotulinumtoxinA was shown to be safe, with very few treatment-related TEAEs in a large, diverse cohort of children/adolescents with chronic conditions requiring long-term treatment and was without new NAb formation in treatment-naïve patients.

Spasticity-related pain in children/adolescents with cerebral palsy. Part 1: Prevalence and clinical characteristics from a pooled analysis.

PURPOSE: A large prospective database from three Phase 3 studies allowed the study of spasticity-related pain (SRP) in pediatric cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Baseline (pretreatment) SRP data occurring during different activities in children/adolescents (aged 2-17 years, ambulant/nonambulant) with uni-/bilateral spastic CP was obtained using the Questionnaire on Pain caused by Spasticity (QPS; six modules specific to spasticity level [lower limb (LL) or upper limb (UL)] and type of respondent [child/adolescent, interviewer, or parent/caregiver]). RESULTS: At baseline, 331 children/adolescents with LL- and 155 with UL-spasticity completed at least one key item of their modules; LL/UL QPS modules of parent/caregivers were at least partially completed (key items) by 841/444 parents/caregivers. SRP with at least one activity at baseline was self-reported in 81.9% /69.7% (LLs/ULs) of children/adolescents with spasticity. Parents/caregivers observed LL/UL SRP behaviors in 85.9% /77.7% of their children, with multiple body regions affected. SRP negatively affected the great majority of the children in various ways. Child/adolescent-reported mean SRP intensity and parent/caregiver-observed mean SRP behavior frequencies were higher for LLs than ULs, and the level of SRP increased with more physically demanding activities. CONCLUSION: These data suggest SRP is more common and intense in pediatric CP than generally thought, emphasizing the need for effective, long-term pain management.

Pain Reduction in Adults with Limb Spasticity Following Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA: A Pooled Analysis.

Some studies have shown that incobotulinumtoxinA reduces spasticity-associated pain, but further evidence is needed. This exploratory analysis pooled pain-relief data from six Phase 2 or 3 studies of incobotulinumtoxinA (four placebo-controlled studies) for treating upper limb spasticity in adults. Spasticity-associated pain was assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post incobotulinumtoxinA injection using the disability assessment scale (DAS) for pain. Only data for patients with pain at baseline were analysed. Overall, 544 (incobotulinumtoxinA, N = 415; placebo, N = 129) of 937 patients (58.1%) experienced pain at baseline. At Week 4, a significantly greater proportion of incobotulinumtoxinA- (52.1%) than placebo-treated patients (28.7%; Chi-square p < 0.0001) showed a response (≥1-point improvement in DAS pain score). In logistic regression analysis, incobotulinumtoxinA-treated patients were 2.6 times more likely to achieve this endpoint than placebo-treated patients. A significant difference between incobotulinumtoxinA and placebo was observed regardless of baseline pain severity. Additionally, 27.1% of incobotulinumtoxinA- versus 12.4% of placebo-treated patients reported complete pain relief at Week 4 (p = 0.0006). Pain relief increased with multiple injection cycles. To achieve patient-centred care, pain relief may be considered a treatment goal in adults with spasticity-associated pain regardless of pain severity. This study contributes to understanding the benefits of incobotulinumtoxinA in treating limb spasticity-associated pain.

Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of IncobotulinumtoxinA for Sialorrhea in Children: SIPEXI.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This prospective phase III study (SIPEXI) investigated efficacy and safety of repeated injections of incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBoNT/A) for treatment of chronic sialorrhea (drooling) associated with neurological disorders (e.g., cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury) and/or intellectual disability in children/adolescents. METHODS: The study enrolled 2-17-year-olds with sialorrhea due to neurological disorders and/or intellectual disability. Patients received body weight-dependent doses of incoBoNT/A (20 U to 75 U). A main period with 1 injection cycle (placebo-controlled, double-blind, 6-17-year-olds) was followed by an open-label extension with up to 3 further cycles. An additional cohort of 2-5-year-olds received active treatment throughout the study. Co-primary endpoints were the change in unstimulated salivary flow rate (uSFR) from baseline to week 4, and the carers' global impression of change scale (GICS) rating at week 4. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: In the main period, 220 patients aged 6-17 years were randomized and treated (148 patients in incoBoNT/A group, 72 patients in placebo group). 35 patients aged 2-5 years received incoBoNT/A (no placebo). 214 patients aged 6-17 years and 33 patients aged 2-5 years continued treatment in the open-label extension period. For the 6-17-year-olds, a significant difference between incoBoNT/A and placebo was seen in the mean uSFR decrease (difference: -0.06 g/min; p = 0.0012) and the carers' GICS rating (difference: 0.28 points; p = 0.032) at week 4, in favor of active treatment. The secondary endpoints consistently supported these results. A sustained benefit was observed during the extension. Incidences of adverse events were comparable between incoBoNT/A and placebo and did not increase notably with repeated injections. The most common adverse events were respiratory infections. Efficacy and safety were also favorable in the uncontrolled cohort of 2-5-year-olds. DISCUSSION: Both co-primary efficacy endpoints were reached and superiority of incoBoNT/A over placebo was confirmed. IncoBoNT/A (up to 75 U, up to 4 cycles) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for sialorrhea associated with neurological disorders in children. STUDY REGISTRATIONS: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02270736 (www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02270736); EU Clinical Trials Register: 2013-004532-30 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2013-004532-30). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that injection of incobotulinumtoxinA decreases drooling in children aged 6-17 years with neurological disorders.

IncobotulinumtoxinA Efficacy/Safety in Upper-Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase 3 study with double-blind main period (MP) and open-label extension (OLEX; NCT02002884) assessed incobotulinumtoxinA safety and efficacy for pediatric upper-limb spasticity treatment in ambulant/nonambulant (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] I-V) patients, with the option of combined upper- and lower-limb treatment. METHODS: Patients were aged two to 17 years with unilateral or bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and Ashworth Scale (AS) score ≥2 in treatment-selected clinical patterns. In the MP, patients were randomized (2:1:1) to incobotulinumtoxinA 8, 6, or 2 U/kg body weight (maximum 200, 150, 50 U/upper limb), with optional lower-limb injections in one of five topographical distributions (total body dose ≤16 to 20 U/kg, maximum 400 to 500 U, depending on body weight and GMFCS level). In the OLEX, patients received three further treatment cycles, at the highest MP doses (8 U/kg/upper limb group). Outcomes included AS, Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: AS scores improved from baseline to week 4 in all MP dose groups (n = 350); patients in the incobotulinumtoxinA 8 U/kg group had significantly greater spasticity improvements versus the 2 U/kg group (least-squares mean [standard error] for upper-limb main clinical target pattern -1.15 [0.06] versus -0.93 [0.08]; P = 0.017). Investigator's, child/adolescent's, and parent/caregiver's GICS scores showed improvements in all groups. Treatment benefits were sustained over further treatment cycles. AE incidence did not increase with dose or repeated treatment across GMFCS levels. CONCLUSIONS: Data provide evidence for sustained efficacy and safety of multipattern incobotulinumtoxinA treatment in children and adolescents with upper-limb spasticity.

Duration and onset of effect of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of blepharospasm in botulinum toxin-naïve subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Blepharospasm is a focal dystonia whereby excessive eyelid muscle contractions cause involuntary eye closure. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injections are an approved treatment. This randomized placebo-controlled trial (NCT01896895; EudraCT number 2012-004821-26) assessed the efficacy, safety, and treatment effect duration of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH), a BoNT-A formulation without complexing proteins, in BoNT-A-naïve adults with blepharospasm. METHODS: Subjects received incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, 25 U (total dose) or placebo during a main study period (MP; 6-20 weeks). Patients needing a second injection received incobotulinumtoxinA ≤70 U in an open-label extension period (EP; 6-20 weeks). Treatment effect durations were time from first injection to EP injection or final MP visit and from EP injection to end-of-study visit. Times to effect onset and to waning of effect (MP) were time from injection to first subject-assessed onset effect and time from injection to subject-reported waning of effect, respectively. RESULTS: Of 61 subjects, 39 entered the EP. During the MP, median duration of treatment effect was longer with incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U (20 weeks) versus incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U (11 weeks) or placebo (6 weeks). Median duration of treatment effect was 20 weeks during the EP. Median time to effect onset was 5, 7, and 14 days with 50 U, 25 U, and placebo, respectively (p = .022 for 50 U versus placebo). Median time to waning of treatment effect was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Subjects reported an effect onset from 5 days after injection lasting up to 20 weeks (maximum observation period). Data indicate that incobotulinumtoxinA re-treatment of blepharospasm may not be required at fixed 12-week intervals and provide evidence for a patient-tailored approach.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYBlepharospasm is a condition in which involuntary contractions of the eyelid muscles cause the eye to close. The condition can be treated with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injections. This study assessed the duration of effect and time to onset of effect for the BoNT-A formulation incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) in adults with blepharospasm. Subjects received a single injection of one of two doses of incobotulinumtoxinA (total dose 25 or 50 U) or placebo and received a second injection of incobotulinumtoxinA only (total dose ≤70 U; the second injection was not compared with placebo) if needed 6­20 weeks after the first injection. After the first injection, the median (mid-point of values from all subjects) duration of treatment effect was longer with the higher incobotulinumtoxinA dose (20 weeks) than with the lower dose (11 weeks) and was longer with both incobotulinumtoxinA doses than with placebo (6 weeks). After the second incobotulinumtoxinA injection, the median duration of treatment effect was 20 weeks. The time to onset of effect was quicker with both incobotulinumtoxinA doses (5 and 7 days for the higher and lower doses, respectively) than with placebo (14 days) and the difference was statistically significant for the higher incobotulinumtoxinA dose compared with placebo. The time to waning of treatment effect was similar for the two incobotulinumtoxinA doses and placebo. This study shows that incobotulinumtoxinA is an effective treatment for blepharospasm, with a fast onset of action. In addition, the effects of one injection can last for up to 20 weeks.

Sustained efficacy of incobotulinumtoxina repeated injections for upper-limb post-stroke spasticity: A post hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the impact of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections on muscle tone, disability, and caregiver burden in adults with upper-limb post-stroke spasticity. DESIGN: Data from the double-blind, placebo-controlled main period and three open-label extension cycles of two Phase 3, randomized, multicentre trials were pooled. METHODS: Subjects received incobotulinumtoxinA 400 Units at 12-week intervals (±3 days) (study 3001, NCT01392300) or ≤ 400 Units at ≥12-week intervals based on clinical need (study 0410, NCT00432666). Ashworth Scale (AS) arm sumscore (sum of elbow, wrist, finger and thumb flexor, and forearm pronator AS scores), Disability Assessment Scale (DAS), and Carer Burden Scale (CBS) scores were assessed. RESULTS: Among 465 subjects, from study baseline to 4 weeks post-injection, mean (standard deviation) AS arm sumscore improved continuously: main period, -3.23 (2.55) (placebo, -1.49 (2.09)); extension cycles 1, 2, and 3, -4.38 (2.85), -4.87 (3.05), and -5.03 (3.02), respectively. DAS principal target domain responder rate increased from 47.4% in the main period (placebo 27.2%) to 66.6% in extension cycle 3. Significant improvements in CBS scores 4 weeks post-injection accompanied improved functional disability in all cycles. CONCLUSION: IncobotulinumtoxinA conferred sustained improvements in muscle tone, disability, and caregiver burden in subjects with upper-limb post-stroke spasticity.

IncobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Blepharospasm in Toxin-Naïve Subjects: A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) in botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects with blepharospasm. Botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects (≥ 12 months without botulinum neurotoxin treatment for blepharospasm) received single-dose incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, 25 U, or placebo. Subjects were followed for 6-20 weeks (main period). Qualified subjects entered an open-label extension period and received another incobotulinumtoxinA injection (≤ 70 U). The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) severity subscore at the main period of week 6. Other efficacy variables included changes in the Blepharospasm Disability Index score and JRS frequency subscore and sumscore. Adverse events were monitored. Sixty-one subjects were randomized (main period: incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, n = 19; incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, n = 22; placebo, n = 20); 39 entered the open-label extension period (9, 14, and 16 subjects from the incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, and placebo groups [main period], respectively, changed to open-label extension period dosing). A statistically significantly greater reduction in JRS severity subscore was reported for subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U versus placebo (ANCOVA, least square mean difference: - 1.2, p = 0.0004). Subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA experienced improvements in other efficacy variables versus baseline and/or placebo. Sustained clinical improvements and low adverse event rates (22.2-42.1%) were observed. This is the second placebo-controlled, double-blind study that demonstrates favorable efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in subjects with blepharospasm. IncobotulinumtoxinA is the first botulinum neurotoxin that could fulfill the American Academy of Neurology criteria for a Level A recommendation for blepharospasm.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01896895.

Post hoc analysis of the improvement in shoulder spasticity and safety observed following treatment with incobotulinumtoxinA.

OBJECTIVE: The Titration study in lOWer and uppER-limb spasticity (TOWER) study (NCT01603459), evaluated incobotulinumtoxinA for upper- and lower-limb spasticity. This post hoc analysis assessed shoulder spasticity in patients who received injections into the shoulder. METHODS: Subjects received 3 injection cycles with escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses on the same side (400, 600, 600-800 U; ≤ 600 U per limb including optional shoulder dose, planned range 100-250 U). Joint function was assessed with the Ashworth Scale shoulder sumscore (AS-SSS) in subjects treated in the shoulder vs those who were not. Safety was assessed in subjects treated in the shoulder, and in those who had upper-limb treatment without shoulder treatment. RESULTS: The proportion of subjects receiving shoulder treatment increased with escalating dose at each cycle (n = 84/140 (60.0%) by cycle 3; mean (standard deviation (SD)) shoulder dose 118.4 U (SD 60.2)). From baseline to 4-weeks post-injection, mean AS-SSS improved by -1.1 (SD 1.9), -1.7 (SD 1.8) and -1.7 (1.8) in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively, in subjects treated in the shoulder, and -0.5 (SD 1.3), -0.8 (SD 1.6) and -0.9 (SD 1.4) in subjects who were not. A significant dose effect on AS-SSS was observed in cycle 3 (p = 0.0081). No unexpected safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate an improvement in shoulder spasticity and safety following incobotulinumtoxinA treatment.

Tolerability and Efficacy of Customized IncobotulinumtoxinA Injections for Essential Tremor: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

In this first, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled exploratory trial, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA and feasibility of using kinematic tremor assessment to aid in the planning of muscle selection in a multicenter setting. Reproducibility of the planning technology to other clinical sites was explored. In this trial (NCT02207946), patients with upper-limb essential tremor (ET) were randomized 2:1 to a single treatment cycle of incobotulinumtoxinA or placebo. A tremor kinematic analytics investigational device was used to define a customized muscle set for injection, related to the pattern of the wrist, forearm, elbow, and shoulder tremor for each patient, and the incobotulinumtoxinA dose per muscle (total ≤ 200 U). Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) Part B motor performance score, Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS), and kinematic analysis-based efficacy evaluations were assessed. Thirty patients were randomized (incobotulinumtoxinA, n = 19; placebo, n = 11). FTM motor performance scores showed greater improvement with incobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo at Week 4 (p= 0.003) and Week 8 (p= 0.031). The physician-rated GICS score indicated improvement with incobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo at Week 4 (p < 0.05). IncobotulinumtoxinA also decreased accelerometric hand-tremor amplitude versus placebo from baseline to Week 4 (p= 0.004) and Week 8 (p < 0.001), with persistent tremor reduction up to 24 weeks post-injection. IncobotulinumtoxinA produced a slight and transient reduction of maximal grip strength versus placebo; two patients reported localized finger muscle weakness. Customized incobotulinumtoxinA injections decreased tremor severity and improved hand motor function in patients with upper-limb ET after a single injection cycle, with a favorable tolerability profile. The study showed that tremor kinematic analytics technology could be successfully scaled for use in other clinical sites.

Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis.

The efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U was demonstrated in subjects with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study with an open-label extension (OLEX; EudraCT number 2005-003951-11, NCT00432666). We report a post-hoc analysis of the duration of the treatment effect. Subjects completing the placebo-controlled main period (single injection cycle with 12-20-week observation) entered the OLEX and received a maximum of five further treatments (maximum duration 69 weeks) with incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U at flexible intervals with a minimum duration of 12 weeks, based on clinical need. Intervals between two consecutive incobotulinumtoxinA injections, excluding treatment intervals prior to the end-of-study visit, were evaluated. Of 437 incobotulinumtoxinA treatment intervals, 415 received by 136 subjects were included in the post-hoc analysis. More than half (52.3%; 217/415) of all incobotulinumtoxinA reinjections were administered at Week ≥14, 31.1% (129/415) at Week ≥16, 19.0% (79/415) at Week ≥18, and 11.6% (48/415) at Week ≥20. The duration of effect may vary and can exceed 20 weeks or more, which was observed in at least one injection cycle in 29.4% (40/136) subjects over the course of their treatment. Data show that incobotulinumtoxinA retreatment for upper-limb spasticity may not be required at 12-week intervals and provides evidence for flexible treatment intervals beyond this time frame.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neramexane in patients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus.

BACKGROUND: Neramexane is a new substance that exhibits antagonistic properties at α9α10 cholinergic nicotinic receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, suggesting potential efficacy in the treatment of tinnitus. METHODS: A total of 431 outpatients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus (onset 3-18 months before screening) were assigned randomly to receive either placebo or neramexane mesylate (25 mg/day, 50 mg/day and 75 mg/day) for 16 weeks, with assessment at 4-week intervals. The primary (intention-to-treat) efficacy analysis was based on the change from baseline in Week 16 in the total score of the adapted German short version of the validated Tinnitus Handicap Inventory questionnaire (THI-12). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the largest improvement was achieved in the 50 mg/d neramexane group, followed by the 75 mg/d neramexane group. This treatment difference did not reach statistical significance at the pre-defined endpoint in Week 16 (p = 0.098 for 50 mg/d; p = 0.289 for 75 mg/d neramexane), but consistent numerical superiority of both neramexane groups compared with placebo was observed. Four weeks after the end of treatment, THI-12 scores in the 50 mg/d group were significantly better than those of the controls. Secondary efficacy variables supported this trend, with p values of < 0.05 for the 50 mg/d neramexane group associated with the functional-communicational subscores of the THI-12 and the assessments of tinnitus annoyance and tinnitus impact on life as measured on an 11-point Likert-like scale. No relevant changes were observed for puretone threshold, for tinnitus pitch and loudness match, or for minimum masking levels. The 25 mg/d neramexane group did not differ from placebo. Neramexane was generally well tolerated and had no relevant influence on laboratory values, electrocardiography and vital signs. Dizziness was the most common adverse event and showed a clear dose-dependence. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the safety and tolerability of neramexane treatment in patients with moderate to severe tinnitus. The primary efficacy variable showed a trend towards improvement of tinnitus suffering in the medium- and high-dose neramexane groups. This finding is in line with consistent beneficial effects observed in secondary assessment variables. These results allow appropriate dose selection for further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00405886.

Antihyperalgesic and analgesic properties of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist neramexane in a human surrogate model of neurogenic hyperalgesia.

NMDA-receptors are a major target in the prevention and treatment of hyperalgesic pain states in neuropathic pain. However, previous studies revealed equivocal results depending on study design and efficacy parameters. We tested the analgesic (generalized reduction of generation and processing of nociceptive signalling) and anti-hyperalgesic (prevention of central sensitization) properties of the NMDA-receptor antagonist neramexane and the potassium channel opener flupirtine in the intradermal capsaicin injection model. Furthermore, we tested the effect on pain summation (wind up). Eighteen healthy subjects received either a single dose of neramexane (40 mg p.o.), flupirtine (100 mg) or placebo in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Pain evoked by intradermal capsaicin injection as well as pain evoked by pinpricks was significantly reduced by neramexane (-22% to -30% vs. placebo) in the non-sensitized skin indicating a marked analgesic effect. Moreover, dynamic mechanical allodynia (pain to light touch) was also significantly attenuated by neramexane (-28% vs. placebo). However, static secondary hyperalgesia to pinprick stimuli after capsaicin injection was not significantly reduced (-9% vs. placebo). Flupirtine showed no analgesic or anti-hyperalgesic effect. Mechanically-evoked wind up of pain sensation was not affected by any treatment. The results suggests that in a human surrogate model of neurogenic hyperalgesia a single low-dose of neramexane had a marked analgesic effect in the sensitized and in the non-sensitized state and thus may be a useful drug to treat the enhanced pain sensitivity in neuropathic pain patients. Its efficacy may be based on analgesia rather than anti-hyperalgesia or anti-windup. In contrast, flupirtine showed neither an analgesic nor an anti-hyperalgesic effect at a dose used for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Determination of dihydroergocryptine in human plasma and urine samples using on-line sample extraction-column-switching reversed-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A rapid and sensitive assay for the determination of dihydroergocryptine (DHEC) in human plasma and urine samples with dihydroergotamine (DHET) as the internal standard was developed. The procedure employs on-line sample preparation using an extraction pre-column and an octadecylsilylsilica (ODS) analytical column. After centrifugation human plasma or urine were injected onto the pre-column, concentrated and extracted, back-flushed onto the analytical column and eluted with a binary methanol--aqueous formic acid gradient. Either determination of DHEC as well of its mono- and dihydroxy-metabolites was performed by measurement of the signal responses from MS detection in the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode using the transition of the respective parent ions to the common daughter ion at m/z=270.2 amu. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for determinations of DHEC in both plasma and urine were 25 pg/ml for injected sample volumes of 400 microl. Proportionality of signal responses versus concentration was accomplished within the range of 25-1000 pg/ml. Recovery of target analyte from plasma was 99%. Mean values of the coefficients of variation (CV) for the target analyte in plasma ranged from 1.7 to 13.8% (within-day) and 5.0 to 9.1% (between-day) and accuracy from 91.7 to 102.6% for the within-day and from 95.8 to 98.8% for the between-day measurements. The corresponding values for determinations in urine were 1.7-14.5% (within-day) and 5.3-11.8% (between-day) for CV and 95.8-110.7% (within-day) and 100.1-104.6% (between-day) for accuracy.

Single dose pharmacokinetics of alpha-dihydroergocryptine in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency.

AIM: This study was carried out to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of alpha-dihydroergocryptine (CAS 14271-05-7, DHEC, Almirid) in plasma and urine in patients with moderately to severely impaired renal function (creatinine clearance < 30 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2), following administration of single oral doses. METHODS: This was an open, nonrandomized trial. Seven patients with chronic renal disease and six healthy subjects received a single dose of 20 mg DHEC. Blood and urine samples were taken at specified intervals up to 72 h after dosing. Concentrations of unchanged DHEC were determined by radio-immunoassay (RIA) and concentrations of unchanged DHEC plus pooled metabolites by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA), respectively. RESULTS: In patients with impaired renal function, the mean Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) values for unchanged DHEC were 2.1 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.99 to 4.42) and 1.85 (95% CI: 0.72 to 4.77) times larger than in controls. The 24-h urinary excretion was only 0.3 (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.71) times that in healthy subjects. Similar findings were recorded for total DHEC plus metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: As treatment with DHEC is in general uptitrated starting with doses as low as 5 mg DHEC, which are then increased while accounting for individual effects both in terms of efficacy and tolerability, the observed range of effects of impaired renal function on DHEC's pharmacokinetics does not suggest the need to revise this policy, although lower end-doses are likely to be achieved.