A survey on oral health-related standard of care for head and neck cancer patients in the EU.

OBJECTIVE: To map oral health-related standard of care in the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment across the European Union (EU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred and ninety centers across the European Union were contacted. The questionnaire contained questions focusing on the team/department structure, HNC treatment planning routines, and assessment and handling of dental treatment needs prior to cancer treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-seven centers across the EU responded. Department structure and number of HNC patients treated per year varied widely and dental professionals are included as part of the team in about 25% of the centers. Standard of care, in terms of dental assessment and preventive dentistry routines, such as recording an orthopantomogram, offering dental treatment, and providing a radiation protection splint and splint for fluoride application, differed significantly among the European regions. Independent of the region, these aspects are positively affected if dental professionals are part of the interdisciplinary treatment team and if dental treatment is offered within the center. CONCLUSION: Dental professionals are still only to a very limited extent included in interdisciplinary treatment planning teams of HNC patients. However, their inclusion and/or offering dental treatment within the same hospital/center appears to improve oral health-related standard of care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Inclusion of dental professionals in treatment planning teams of HNC patients appears to improve oral health-related standard of care within HNC treatment.

Effect of mannitol-based reduced-volume hydration on kidney function in concomitant cisplatin-based chemoradiation for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Nephrotoxicity is frequent in cisplatin-based chemoradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Toxicity outcomes and achieved cisplatin-doses after change of departmental hydration policy are presented. METHODS: We performed a retrospective time-series analysis of HNSCC patients undergoing chemoradiation with conventional hydration (CH) between 01/2017 and 09/2018 versus shorter hydration with mannitol (SHM) between 09/2018 and 08/2019 to compare the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) and cumulative cisplatin dose. RESULTS: Among 113 HNSCC patients, SHM (n = 35) in comparison to CH (n = 78) correlated with less AKI (54.3% vs. 74.4%; p = 0.034) and higher cisplatin doses (82.9% vs. 61.5% ≥200 mg/m2 ; p = 0.025). AKI ≥grade 2 was lower with SHM (2.9% vs. CH: 22.8%; p = 0.01). AKI occurred more frequently in females (92.6% vs. males: 60.5%, p = 0.002). Females received lower cumulative cisplatin doses (51.9% vs. males: 73.3%; p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: We observed less AKI and higher cumulative chemotherapy doses with SHM. Female patients were at higher risk of AKI.

Long-Term Swallowing Outcome and Dysphagia in Advanced Staged Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas after Radiotherapy.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of radiotherapy (RT) on dysphagia and long-term swallowing outcome in patients with stage III and IV head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Material and Methods: Between 2005 and 2008, 189 patients with HNSCCs underwent primary or adjuvant RT in a curative setting. Long-term swallowing outcome was evaluated in 50 patients. Among them, 26 were further eligible for prospective analysis of long-term swallowing and dysphagia outcome. Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed regarding pre- and post-treatment dysphagia (3 months after last irradiation setting) as well as persisting long-term dysphagia (2019−2021). Results: Pre-treatment dysphagia was observed in 24 (48%) of 50 patients, particularly in oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal stage III−IV tumors (OR 9.3; p = 0.003). Conversely, 46 patients (92%) complained about post-treatment dysphagic symptoms, which were more commonly seen in patients with positive neck nodes (OR 10.5; p = 0.037). The post-treatment dysphagia rate dropped from 92% to 24% (p < 0.001) during surveillance, which was significantly linked to xerostomia (OR 5.77; p = 0.019), dysgeusia (OR 9.9; p = 0.036) and free flap reconstruction (OR 6.1; p = 0.022). Conclusion: Pretreatment dysphagia is common in advanced stage HNSCCs and almost all patients complain about dysphagia at the end of RT. Importantly, applied RT protocols did not affect long-term dysphagia, which improves significantly in the majority of patients over time. Meeting Information: Preliminary results have been presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Otorhinolaryngology, 22−26 September 2021, Austria.

Potential association of the prognostic index and survival in patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the prognostic value of the newly proposed prognostic index (PI) in patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Patients treated with primary surgery from 2012 to 2019 with available preoperative (0-2 days) values of C­reactive protein and white blood cell counts needed for calculation of the PI, were included. Main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The PI was dichotomized into low (PI = 0) and high (PI ≥ 1). RESULTS: In this study 36 patients were included. Average overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 3.3 years (range 0.2-12.3 years) and 2.8 years (0.0-9.8 years), respectively. The overall mortality was 16.7% (n = 6) and a recurrent disease was observed in 30.6% of patients (n = 11). Low PI was associated with better overall survival (mean OS 10.1 ± 1.4 years, 95% confidence interval, CI 7.3-12.9 years vs. 1.9 ± 0.4, 95% CI 1.3-2.6 years, p < 0.01; mean DFS 8.5 ± 0.7 years, 95% CI 7.1-9.6 years vs. 1.0 ± 0.3 years, 95% CI 0.5-1.5 years, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The PI might be an easily obtainable outcome prognosticator in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Analyzing routinely obtained blood samples can contribute to identifying high-risk patients.

Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU compared with docetaxel, cisplatin and cetuximab as induction chemotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of a randomised phase II AGMT trial.

PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cisplatin (P), 5-FU (F) and taxanes (T) is a therapeutical option in patients suffering from locally advanced or unresectable stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The role of ICT is controversial, and toxicity and/or delay of radiotherapy (RT) may reduce the potential benefit of this treatment regimen. Here, we report the results of a randomised phase II trial comparing TPF with TP + cetuximab (C). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this trial, 100 patients with locally advanced stage III or IV SCCHN were included in the analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to either TPF-ICT (N = 49) or TPC-ICT (N = 51), both followed by RT + C. The primary end-point of the study was overall response rate (ORR) three months after RT + C was finished. RESULTS: On an intention-to-treat basis, the ORR (complete remission + partial remission) was 74.5% in the TPC arm compared with 63.3% in the TPF arm (p = 0.109). OS was similar in both arms 400 days after treatment was initiated (86.1% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 73.0-93.1%] in the TPC arm and 78.5% [95% CI, 63.7-87.8%] in the TPF arm). TPC resulted in slightly less serious adverse events and in less haematological, but more skin toxicities. Two patients randomised in the TPC arm died during ICT and RT. Four patients in the TPF arm died after completion of RT. No delay from the end of ICT to RT + C was observed. A total of 83.1% of patients (80% in the TPC arm; 86% in the TPF arm) received RT without dose reduction and/or modification. CONCLUSION: TPC-containing ICT for patients with locally advanced SCCHN was found to be an effective and tolerable one-day regimen. Further prospective evidence from larger trials is warranted.

Dysregulation of ß-catenin, WISP1 and TCF21 predicts disease-specific survival and primary response against radio(chemo)therapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic and predictive impact of ß-catenin, TCF21 and WISP1 expression in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck who underwent primary radiotherapy or concomitant chemoradiotherapy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Protein expression profiles of ß-catenin, TCF21, WISP1 and p16 were determined by immunohistochemical analyses in tissue samples of 59 untreated patients. Expression was correlated with different outcome parameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact of TNM classification, grading, sex, age, gender, type of therapy, response to therapy and p16 status on disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Patients with high expression of TCF21 were associated with significantly worse disease-specific survival (P = 0.005). In a multivariable analysis, TCF21 was a significant determinant of disease-specific survival. (HR 3.01; P = 0.036). Conversely, low expression of ß-catenin (P = 0.025) and WISP1 (P = 0.037) revealed a better response to radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Since data show that TCF21 is a prognostic factor for disease-specific survival and WISP1 and ß-catenin are predictive factors for clinical outcome after definitive radiotherapy, further studies are warranted to prove these preliminary but very promising findings.

Prognostic survival value of retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in sinonasal tumors: A retrospective, descriptive, and exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal carcinomas are rare. The purpose of this study was for us to present our assessment of the effects of retropharyngeal lymph node involvement at diagnosis on patient outcomes. METHODS: Retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in 36 patients with sinonasal carcinoma was determined by radiology at initial presentation. Clinical outcome, in particular, overall survival (OS) and locoregional control, was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. RESULTS: Retropharyngeal lymph node involvement was associated with statistically significant decreased OS (P = .0066) in the patient collective. In the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) subgroup (n = 23), decreased OS (P = .0046) and worse locoregional control (P = .0065) were observed. In these patients, decreased OS (P = .0423) and worse locoregional control (P = .0315) were also seen in the advanced tumor subgroup. CONCLUSION: Retropharyngeal lymph node involvement at diagnosis is a significant prognostic factor for decreased OS and locoregional control in sinonasal carcinoma.

AZD5582, an IAP antagonist that leads to apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and is eligible for combination with irradiation.

CONCLUSION: On the one hand, AZD5582, an inhibitor of inhibitor of apoptosis family proteins (IAP), leads to cellular growth arrest and induction of apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines. On the other hand, it is a viable candidate for combination therapy with irradiation. OBJECTIVES: The aim and purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of AZD5582 on HNSCC cell lines. METHODS: HNSCC cell lines SCC25, Cal27, and FaDu were used for all cell culture experiments. Proliferation assays were used to assess a potential inhibitory effect of AZD5582 and a combination therapy of the IAP inhibitor and irradiation. Colony forming assays were used to determine long-term effects of a combined treatment. Apoptosis was measured via flow cytometry and wound-healing assays were performed. RESULTS: All three cell lines showed a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect after treatment with AZD5582. It was possible to observe a synergistic and additive effect after short-term treatment of AZD5582 and irradiation in Ca27 and FaDu cells, respectively. All test cell lines showed a significant inhibition of colony formation after combined treatment. Treatment of AZD5582 resulted in apoptosis in SCC25, Cal27, and FaDu cells.

ART for head and neck patients: On the difference between VMAT and IMPT.

UNLABELLED: Anatomical changes in the head-and-neck (H&N) region during the course of treatment can cause deteriorated dose distributions. Different replanning strategies were investigated for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For six H&N patients two repeated computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) (CT1/MR1 at week 2 and CT2/MR2 at week 4) scans were acquired additionally to the initial planning CT/MR. Organs-at-risk (OARs) and three targets (CTV70Gy, CTV63Gy, CTV56Gy) were delineated on MRs and transferred to respective CT data set. Simultaneously integrated boost plans were created using VMAT (two arcs) and IMPT (four beams). To assess the need of replanning the initial VMAT and IMPT plans were recalculated on repeated CTs. Furthermore, VMAT and IMPT plans were replanned on the repeated CTs. A Demon algorithm was used for deformable registration of the repeated CTs with the initial CT and utilized for dose accumulation. Total dose estimations were performed to compare ART versus standard treatment strategies. RESULTS: Dosimetric evaluation of recalculated plans on CT1 and CT2 showed increasing OAR doses for both, VMAT and IMPT. The target coverage of recalculated VMAT plans was considered acceptable in three cases, while for all IMPT plans it dropped. Adaptation of the treatment reduced D2% for brainstem by 6.7 Gy for VMAT and by 8 Gy for IMPT, for particular patients. These D2% reductions were reaching 9 Gy and 14 Gy for the spinal cord. ART improved target dose homogeneity, especially for protons, i.e. D2% decreased by up to 8 Gy while D98% increased by 1.2 Gy. CONCLUSION: ART showed benefits for both modalities. However, as IMPT is more conformal, the magnitude of dosimetric changes was more pronounced compared to VMAT. Large anatomic variations had a severe impact on treatment plan quality for both VMAT and IMPT. ART is justified in those cases irrespective of treatment modalities.

Improved survival in HPV/p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: In the literature, HPV infection and/or p16 positivity have been consistently demonstrated to correlate with improved response rates in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT) alone and in combination with chemotherapy. However, the exact role of HPV/p16 positivity in patients treated with postoperative RT is still unclear. METHODS: We analyzed tumor samples for HPV-DNA and p16 expression and correlated these variables with treatment outcome in a series of 63 consecutively treated oropharyngeal cancer patients (95% stage III/IV). HPV and p16 analysis were performed using validated test systems. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to compare the risk of death among patients stratified according to risk factors. RESULTS: Expression of p16 or high-risk HPV-DNA was detected in 60.3% and 39.6% of the tumors, respectively. p16 expression [overall survival (OS) at 2 years: 91%] as well as HPV infection (OS at 2 years: 95%) was associated with improved OS. Mean survival in p16-positive patients was 112 months compared to 64.6 months in case of p16 negativity. All HPV-positive tumors stained positive for p16. In a multivariable analysis, p16 positivity was associated with improved OS and with disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: p16 expression and HPV infection are strongly associated with the outcome of postoperatively irradiated OPSCC patients. HPV and p16 double-negative OPSCC patients should be regarded as a distinct "very high-risk patient group" that may benefit from intensified or novel treatment combinations.

Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets: the influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability.

PURPOSE: It is generally agreed that the safe implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy requires image guidance. The aim of this work was to assess interobserver variability in the delineation of lung lesions on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images compared with CT-based contouring for adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy. The influence of target size was also evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volumes in 12 patient cases (non-small cell lung cancer I-II or solitary metastasis) on planning CTs and on CBCTs. Cases were divided into two groups with tumor diameters of less than (Group A) or more than 2 cm (Group B). Comparison of mean volumes delineated by all observers and range and coefficient of variation were reported for each case and image modality. Interobserver variability was assessed by means of standard error of measurement, conformity index (CI), and its generalized observer-independent approach. The variance between single observers on CT and CBCT images was measured via interobserver reliability coefficient. RESULTS: Interobserver variability on CT images was 17% with 0.79 reliability, compared with 21% variability on CBCT and 0.76 reliability. On both image modalities, values of the intraobserver reliability coefficient (0.99 for CT and 0.97 for CBCT) indicated high reproducibility of results. In general, lower interobserver agreement was observed for small lesions (CI(genA) = 0.62 ± 0.06 vs. CI(genB) = 0.70 ± 0.03, p < 0.05). The analysis of single patient cases revealed that presence of spicules, diffuse infiltrations, proximity of the tumors to the vessels and thoracic wall, and respiration motion artifacts presented the main sources of the variability. CONCLUSION: Interobserver variability for Stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastasis was slightly higher on CBCT compared with CT. Absence of significant differences in interobserver variability suggests that CBCT imaging provides an effective tool for tumor localization, and image data could be also used for target volume delineation purposes.

Trastuzumab and gemcitabine as salvage therapy in heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In Her2-postive metastatic breast carcinoma, first-line trastuzumab-based therapy is well established; many centres continue antibody treatment beyond disease progression. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and trastuzumab after earlier exposure to anthracyclines, docetaxel and/or vinorelbine, and trastuzumab. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients were included as eligible. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2 on day one and eight, every 21 days. Trastuzumab was administered in three-week cycles. Clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD > or = 6 months) was defined as primary endpoint. RESULTS: As of July 2007, all patients are evaluable for toxicity, and 26 for response. Earlier therapies consisted of trastuzumab (100%), anthracyclines (100%), vinorelbine (96.6%), docetaxel (72.4%), and capecitabine (72.4%). 19.2% of patients experienced PR, and SD > or = 6 months was observed in a further 26.9%, resulting in a CBR of 46.2%. Time to progression was median 3 months, and overall survival 17 months. Neutropenia (20.7%), thrombocytopenia (13.8%), and nausea (3.4%) were the only treatment-related adverse events that occurred with grade 3 or 4 intensity. Four patients (13.8%) developed brain metastases while on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: While CBR was low when compared to trastuzumab-based first-line therapy, it is higher than what would be expected from gemcitabine monotherapy in a similar setting. Together with the favourable toxicity profile, this regimen appears to be a safe and potentially effective salvage therapy option in a heavily pre-treated population.

Capecitabine and trastuzumab in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2)-positive advanced breast cancer, taxanes or vinorelbine plus trastuzumab are among the most widely applied options in the first-line setting. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine plus trastuzumab after anthracycline and docetaxel or vinorelbine failure and prior trastuzumab exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients were included. Capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) bid for 14 consecutive days in 3-week cycles, with dose modifications if necessary. Trastuzumab was administered every 3 weeks. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary end point. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. RESULTS: TTP was a median of 8 months, and overall survival was 24 months. No significant difference was found for second-line and beyond second-line treatment. A complete response (CR) was observed in 2.5%, partial response (PR) in 17.5%, stable disease lasting at least 6 months (SD) in 50%, resulting in a clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD > or = 6 months) of 70%. Diarrhea (5%) and hand-foot syndrome (15%) were the only treatment-related adverse events that occurred with grade 3 or 4 intensity. Three patients (7.5%) developed brain metastases while receiving therapy. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine plus trastuzumab appears to be an effective and safe option in a heavily pretreated population. Therefore, a direct comparison of this regimen with capecitabine monotherapy in this setting is warranted.

Her2 and progesterone receptor status are not predictive of response to fulvestrant treatment.

PURPOSE: It has been hypothesized that response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on Her2 and progesterone receptor status, grading, and tumor proliferation rate. In this study, we evaluated factors that are potentially predictive of response and time to progression in patients treated with fulvestrant. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred fifty-five patients were included and followed prospectively. Patients received fulvestrant at standard dose by i.m. injection. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was done to evaluate factors potentially influencing response and time to progression. RESULTS: We observed a partial response in 19 patients (12.3%), stable disease > or =6 months in 56 patients (36.1%), stable disease >3 months but <6 months in 7 patients (4.5%), and progressive disease in 73 patients (47.1%). Median time to progression was 5 months, and median overall survival was 27 months. Probability of achieving clinical benefit was significantly associated with a low proliferation rate (P = 0.015), nonvisceral metastatic sites (P = 0.023), and first-line therapy (P = 0.023). First-line therapy was also associated with prolonged time to progression (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Response rate and time to progression are shown to be independent of Her2 status, grading, and progesterone receptor status. This is probably caused by the unique mechanism of action associated with fulvestrant: Due to receptor down-regulation, it blocks nuclear, cytoplasmatic, and membrane-bound estrogen receptor. Therefore, it seems to inhibit the cross-talk between growth factor receptor signaling and estrogen receptor in a more effective manner.

Expression of thymidine phosphorylase in peripheral blood cells of breast cancer patients is not increased by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: A synergistic cytotoxic effect has been hypothesized for taxanes and capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil. Based on preclinical studies, this synergism has been attributed to an up-regulation of the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Beside tumour tissue, TP is highly expressed in white blood cells, possibly causing increased hematotoxicity, when taxanes are combined with capecitabine. So far, this hypothesis has not been investigated in humans. METHODS: A total of 128 consecutive blood samples were collected from eight patients with advanced breast cancer receiving paclitaxel weekly at a dose of 80 mg/m2. To assess the expression of TP in blood cells, samples were collected prior to first therapy, at the end of infusion, and up to 15 days thereafter. This procedure was repeated during the sixth application of paclitaxel. After isolation of the peripheral mononuclear blood cells, the expression of TP was assessed by ELISA. In parallel, paclitaxel level in plasma was evaluated at three selected time points as pharmacokinetic control parameter. RESULTS: Paclitaxel concentrations at the end of infusion did not change significantly from week 1 to week 6. The expression of TP in peripheral mononuclear blood cells decreased significantly after infusion below pretherapeutic values (p = 0.023; n = 8). After the nadir on day 3, the expression of TP increased moderately returning to baseline levels within one week. The overall picture in week 6 was similar to week 1. Using a trend analysis, neither a short-term nor a long-term induction of TP was observed. CONCLUSION: TP in peripheral mononuclear blood cells was hardly regulated under therapy with paclitaxel. Therefore, no increased haematotoxicity due to TP upregulation is expected from the combination of taxanes and capecitabine.

Trastuzumab prolongs overall survival in patients with brain metastases from Her2 positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are frequently encountered in Her2 positive advanced breast cancer. It is still not clear, if trastuzumab treatment should be continued following their diagnosis. In this analysis we evaluated if trastuzumab was able to influence time to in-brain progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). For this reason, we compared patients who continued on trastuzumab with a historical control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen Her2 positive patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases and continuing on trastuzumab were identified. As historical control group, thirty-six patients treated before 2002 were identified from a breast cancer database. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors were potentially able to significantly influence TTP and OS. RESULTS: Median TTP was 6 months, range 1-33+ months. Median OS was 7 months, range 1-38 months. Seventeen patients received trastuzumab after WBRT. Factors associated with prolonged TTP were KPS (p = 0.001), and intensified local treatment (p = 0.004). A trend towards longer TTP was observed in patients treated with trastuzumab (p = 0.068). OS was significantly influenced by KPS (p < 0.001), and continued antibody therapy (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Two parameters were significantly associated with prolonged OS: KPS and trastuzumab. While there was a trend towards prolonged TTP in patients with trastuzumab treatment after WBRT, this did not reach statistical significance. It appears therefore reasonable to suggest continuation of antibody therapy in patients with good performance status despite disease spreading to the brain. Concerning activity of trastuzumab in brain metastases themselves, no final conclusion is possible.

Results from an observational trial with oral vinorelbine and trastuzumab in advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oral vinorelbine plus trastuzumab (OV + T) in Her2 positive advanced breast cancer as first line chemotherapy or after progressing on earlier treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (median age: 59 years) were included. Patients received OV in a dose of 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, q=21, without dose escalation. Trastuzumab was administered every 3 weeks at a dose of 6 mg/kg bodyweight after a loading dose of 8 mg/kg. Response was evaluated every three cycles using UICC criteria. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors potentially influencing response rate and TTP. RESULTS: Median time of observation was 20 months. We observed a complete response in 18% of patients, partial remission in 50%, stable disease >or= 6 months in 21%, and progressive disease in 11%. TTP was median 9 months. OS was not reached. Response rate and TTP were influenced by line of treatment only. The main toxicities consisted of neutropenia and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: OV + T appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in advanced breast cancer at the dose and schedule chosen.