Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 117(6-7): 392-401, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) were created to manage ventricular arrhythmias after acute coronary syndromes, but have diversified to include a more heterogeneous population, the characteristics of which are not well depicted by conventional methods. AIMS: To identify ICCU patient subgroups by phenotypic unsupervised clustering integrating clinical, biological, and echocardiographic data to reveal pathophysiological differences. METHODS: During 7-22 April 2021, we recruited all consecutive patients admitted to ICCUs in 39 centers. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse events (MAEs; death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock). A cluster analysis was performed using a Kamila algorithm. RESULTS: Of 1499 patients admitted to the ICCU (69.6% male, mean age 63.3±14.9 years), 67 (4.5%) experienced MAEs. Four phenogroups were identified: PG1 (n=535), typically patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PG2 (n=444), younger smokers with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PG3 (n=273), elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and conduction disturbances; PG4 (n=247), patients with acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Compared to PG1, multivariable analysis revealed a higher risk of MAEs in PG2 (odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-10.0) and PG3 (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.02-10.8), with the highest risk in PG4 (OR 20.5, 95% CI 8.7-60.8) (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis of clinical, biological, and echocardiographic variables identified four phenogroups of patients admitted to the ICCU that were associated with distinct prognostic profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05063097.


Subject(s)
Coronary Care Units , Phenotype , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Risk Factors , Cluster Analysis , Risk Assessment , Hospital Mortality , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Prognosis , Time Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heart Arrest/physiopathology , Heart Arrest/diagnosis , Heart Arrest/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Aged, 80 and over , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality
3.
Int J Cardiol ; 397: 131632, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38048882

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Re-POT (proximal optimization technique (POT)) is a simple provisional sequential technique for percutaneous coronary bifurcation revascularization with better arterial geometry respect compared to classical techniques. Re-POT has demonstrated excellent mechanical and short-term clinical results. The multicenter CABRIOLET registry (NCT03550196) evaluate the long-term clinical benefit of the re-POT sequence in non-selected patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients presenting a coronary bifurcation lesion for which provisional stenting was indicated were included in 5 european centers. Re-POT strategy was systematically attempted. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), comprising cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months' follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint, all-cause death, target vessel failure (TVF) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Complex bifurcation was defined as Medina 0.1.1 or 1.1.1. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients aged 67.7 ± 11.7 years, 78.4% male, were included from 2015 to 2019, 174 of whom (34.8%) were considered having complex bifurcation lesions. Bifurcations involved the left main in 35.2% of cases. The full re-POT sequence was systematically performed in all cases. At 1 year, TLF was 2.0% (1.7% in complex vs. 2.1% in non-complex bifurcation; p = NS), and TLR was 1.6%, (1.1% vs. 1.8% respectively; p = NS). TVF and TVR rates were 3.2% and 2.8%. On multivariate analysis, only multivessel disease was predictive of TLF at 1 year (OR = 1.66 (1.09-2.53), p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this large prospective all-comer registry, provisional stenting with re-POT technique appeared safe and effective at 1 year, without anatomical bifurcation restriction.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Male , Female , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Stents/adverse effects , Registries , Coronary Angiography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...