Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
J Registry Manag ; 49(1): 17-22, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260619

ABSTRACT

Objective: Fetal death certificates (FDCs) are the main source of stillbirth surveillance data in the United States, yet previous studies suggest FDCs have incomplete ascertainment. The objectives of this analysis were (1) to evaluate whether the use of an existing birth defects surveillance program (the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program [MACDP]) to conduct surveillance on stillbirths enhances case ascertainment, and (2) to compare stillbirth prevalence estimates in metropolitan Atlanta using data from MACDP and FDCs, independently and combined, from 2009-2015. Methods: Stillbirths were ascertained by MACDP and FDCs from 2009-2015. Capture-recapture methods were used to estimate the relative contributions of each data source. Prevalence estimates generated from each data source independently and combined were compared. Results: There were 3,031 stillbirths ascertained by FDCs and MACDP in metropolitan Atlanta from 2009-2015. It was assumed that 35% of FDCs unlinked to MACDP were misclassified as stillbirth. Under this assumption, an estimated 2,610 total stillbirths occurred. Accounting for potential misclassification in the FDC, the prevalence rate for stillbirth was 6.9 per 1,000 live births plus stillbirths for stillbirths captured only in FDC, and 6.2 per 1,000 live births plus stillbirths for stillbirths caught only in MACDP. Using both sources combined for casefinding, the prevalence rate was 10.0 per 1,000 live births plus stillbirths for all years combined. Conclusions: Expanding certain birth defects surveillance programs to conduct surveillance on stillbirths could potentially enhance existing surveillance data on stillbirths when linked to FDCs.


Subject(s)
Population Surveillance , Stillbirth , Pregnancy , Female , United States , Humans , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Fetal Death , Prenatal Care , Fetus
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(18): e013608, 2019 09 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31510829

ABSTRACT

Background Our objective was to estimate receipt of preconception health care among women with congenital heart defects (CHD), according to 2017 American Heart Association recommendations, as a baseline for evaluating recommendation implementation. Methods and Results Using 2007 to 2013 IBM MarketScan Commercial Databases, we identified women with CHD diagnosis codes ages 15 to 44 years who became pregnant and were enrolled in health insurance for ≥11 months in the year before estimated conception. We assessed documentation of complete blood count, electrolytes, thyroid-stimulating hormone, liver function, ECG, comprehensive echocardiogram, and exercise stress test, using procedural codes, and outpatient prescription claims for US Food and Drug Administration category D and X cardiac-related medications. Differences were examined according to CHD severity, age, region of residence, year of conception, and documented encounters at obstetric and cardiology practices. We found 2524 pregnancies among 2003 women with CHD (14.4% severe CHD). In the 98.3% of women with a healthcare encounter in the year before conception, <1% received all and 22.6% received no American Heart Association-recommended tests or assessments (range: 54.4% for complete blood count to 3.1% for exercise stress test). Women with the highest prevalence of receipt of recommended care were 35 to 44 years old, pregnant in 2012 to 2013, or had a documented obstetric or cardiology encounter in the year before conception (P<0.05 for all). In 9.0% of pregnancies, ≥1 prescriptions for US Food and Drug Administration category D or X cardiac-related medications were filled in the year before conception. Conclusions A low percentage of women with CHD received American Heart Association-recommended preconception health care in the year before conception.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Preconception Care/standards , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , American Heart Association , Blood Cell Count/statistics & numerical data , Blood Chemical Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Cardiology , Disease Management , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Electrocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Exercise Test/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Heart Defects, Congenital/drug therapy , Heart Defects, Congenital/physiopathology , Humans , Implementation Science , Insurance, Health , Liver Function Tests/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/physiopathology , Thyrotropin/blood , United States , Young Adult
3.
Birth Defects Res ; 111(2): 88-95, 2019 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623611

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with influenza are more likely to have complications, but information on infant outcomes is limited. METHODS: Five state/local health departments collected data on outcomes of infants born to pregnant women with 2009 H1N1 influenza reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from April to December 2009. Collaborating sites linked information on pregnant women with confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza, many who were severely ill, to their infants' birth certificates. Collaborators also collected birth certificate data from two comparison groups that were matched with H1N1-affected pregnancies on month of conception, sex, and county of residence. RESULTS: 490 pregnant women with influenza, 1,451 women without reported influenza with pregnancies in the same year, and 1,446 pregnant women without reported influenza with prior year pregnancies were included. Women with 2009 H1N1 influenza admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU; n = 64) were more likely to deliver preterm infants (<37 weeks), low birth weight infants, and infants with Apgar scores <=6 at 5 min than women in comparison groups (adjusted relative risk, aRR = 3.9 [2.7, 5.6], aRR = 4.6 [2.9, 7.5], and aRR = 8.7 [3.6, 21.2], for same year comparisons, respectively). Women with influenza who were not hospitalized and hospitalized women not admitted to the ICU did not have significantly elevated risks for adverse infant outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Severely ill women with 2009 H1N1 influenza during pregnancy were more likely to have adverse birth outcomes than women without influenza, providing more support for influenza vaccination during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/mortality , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A virus/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Parturition , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/virology , Premature Birth , Risk Factors
4.
Birth Defects Res ; 110(19): 1478-1486, 2018 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30444307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In this data brief, we examine major eye and ear anomalies (anophthalmia/microphthalmia, anotia/microtia, and congenital cataract) for a recent 5-year birth cohort using data from 30 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. METHODS: As a special call for data for the 2018 NBDPN Annual Report, state programs reported expanded data on eye/ear anomalies for birth years 2011-2015. We calculated the combined overall prevalence (per 10,000 live births) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the three anomalies as well as by maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, laterality, presence/absence of other major birth defects, and case ascertainment methodology utilized by the program (active vs. passive). RESULTS: The overall prevalence estimate (per 10,000 live births) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.5) for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, 1.5 (95% CI: 1.4-1.6) for congenital cataract, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.8) for anotia/microtia. Congenital cataract prevalence varied little by maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, or case ascertainment methodology; prevalence differences were more apparent across strata for anophthalmia/microphthalmia and anotia/microtia. Prevalence among active vs. passive ascertainment programs was 50% higher for anophthalmia/microphthalmia (1.9 vs. 1.2) and two-fold higher for anotia/microtia (2.6 vs. 1.2). Anophthalmia/microphthalmia was more likely than other conditions to co-occur with other birth defects. All conditions were more frequent among older mothers (40+ years). CONCLUSIONS: This data brief provides recent prevalence estimates for anophthalmia/microphthalmia, congenital cataract, and anotia/microtia that address a data gap by examining pooled data from 30 population-based surveillance systems, covering a five-year birth cohort of about 12.4 million births.


Subject(s)
Anophthalmos/epidemiology , Congenital Microtia/epidemiology , Microphthalmos/epidemiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cataract/epidemiology , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Ear/abnormalities , Eye Abnormalities , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Maternal Age , Mothers , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance/methods , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Registries , Risk Factors , United States
5.
Birth Defects Res ; 109(18): 1504-1514, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29152924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal defects are a phenotypically and etiologically diverse group of malformations. Despite their combined prevalence and clinical impact, little is known about the epidemiology of these birth defects. Therefore, the objective of the 2017 National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) data brief was to better describe the occurrence of gastrointestinal defects. METHODS: As part of the 2017 NBDPN annual report, 28 state programs provided additional data on gastrointestinal defects for the period 2010-2014. Counts and prevalence estimates (per 10,000 live births) were calculated overall and by demographic characteristics for (1) biliary atresia; (2) esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula; (3) rectal and large intestinal atresia/stenosis; and (4) small intestinal atresia/stenosis. Additionally, we explored the frequency of these malformations co-occurring with other structural birth defects. RESULTS: Pooling data from all participating registries, the prevalence estimates were: 0.7 per 10,000 live births for biliary atresia (713 cases); 2.3 per 10,000 live births for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (2,472 cases); 4.2 per 10,000 live births for rectal and large intestinal atresia/stenosis (4,334 cases); and 3.4 per 10,000 live births for small intestinal atresia/stenosis (3,388 cases). Findings related to co-occurring birth defects were especially notable for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula, rectal and large intestinal atresia/stenosis, and small intestinal atresia/stenosis, where the median percentage of non-isolated cases was 53.9%, 45.5%, and 50.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These population-based prevalence estimates confirm some previous studies, and provide a foundation for future epidemiologic studies of gastrointestinal defects. Exploring the genetic and environmental determinants of these malformations may yield new clues into their etiologies.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Biliary Atresia/epidemiology , Colon/abnormalities , Databases, Factual , Esophageal Atresia/epidemiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Tract , Humans , Intestinal Atresia/epidemiology , Live Birth , Male , Population Surveillance/methods , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Registries , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/epidemiology , United States
6.
J Nutr ; 147(6): 1183-1193, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28404832

ABSTRACT

Background: Folate deficiency, vitamin B-12 deficiency, and anemia can have adverse effects on birth outcomes. Also, low vitamin B-12 reduces the formation of metabolically active folate.Objectives: We sought to establish the baseline prevalence of and factors associated with folate deficiency and insufficiency, vitamin B-12 deficiency, and anemia among women of childbearing age (WCBA) in Belize.Methods: In 2011, a national probability-based survey was completed among Belizean nonpregnant WCBA aged 15-49 y. Blood samples for determination of hemoglobin, folate (RBC and serum), and vitamin B-12 (plasma) and sociodemographic and health information were collected from 937 women. RBC and serum folate concentrations were measured by microbiologic assay (MBA). Folate status was defined based on both the WHO-recommended radioproteinbinding assay and the assay adjusted for the MBA.Results: The national prevalence estimates for folate deficiency in WCBA, based on serum and RBC folate concentrations by using the assay-matched cutoffs, were 11.0% (95% CI: 8.6%, 14.0%) and 35.1% (95% CI: 31.3%, 39.2%), respectively. By using the assay-matched compared with the WHO-recommended cutoffs, a substantially higher prevalence of folate deficiency was observed based on serum (6.9% absolute difference) and RBC folate (28.9% absolute difference) concentrations. The prevalence for RBC folate insufficiency was 48.9% (95% CI: 44.8%, 53.1%). Prevalence estimates for vitamin B-12 deficiency and marginal deficiency and anemia were 17.2% (95% CI: 14.2%, 20.6%), 33.2% (95% CI: 29.6%, 37.1%), and 22.7% (95% CI: 19.5%, 26.2%), respectively. The adjusted geometric means of the RBC folate concentration increased significantly (P-trend < 0.001) in WCBA who had normal vitamin B-12 status relative to WCBA who were vitamin B-12 deficient.Conclusions: In Belize, the prevalence of folate and vitamin B-12 deficiencies continues to be a public health concern among WCBA. Furthermore, low folate status co-occurred with low vitamin B-12 status, underlining the importance of providing adequate vitamin B-12 and folic acid intake through approaches such as mandatory food fortification.


Subject(s)
Folic Acid Deficiency/epidemiology , Folic Acid/blood , Nutritional Status , Vitamin B 12 Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin B 12/blood , Vitamin B Complex/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia/blood , Anemia/epidemiology , Belize/epidemiology , Erythrocytes/metabolism , Female , Folic Acid Deficiency/blood , Folic Acid Deficiency/complications , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Humans , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Vitamin B 12 Deficiency/blood , Vitamin B 12 Deficiency/complications , Young Adult
7.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol ; 106(11): 972-982, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27891783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Congenital microcephaly has been linked to maternal Zika virus infection. However, ascertaining infants diagnosed with microcephaly can be challenging. METHODS: Thirty birth defects surveillance programs provided data on infants diagnosed with microcephaly born 2009 to 2013. The pooled prevalence of microcephaly per 10,000 live births was estimated overall and by maternal/infant characteristics. Variation in prevalence was examined across case finding methods. Nine programs provided data on head circumference and conditions potentially contributing to microcephaly. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of microcephaly was 8.7 per 10,000 live births. Median prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was similar among programs using active (6.7) and passive (6.6) methods; the interdecile range of prevalence estimates was wider among programs using passive methods for all race/ethnicity categories except Hispanic. Prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was lowest among non-Hispanic Whites (6.5) and highest among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics (11.2 and 11.9, respectively); estimates followed a U-shaped distribution by maternal age with the highest prevalence among mothers <20 years (11.5) and ≥40 years (13.2). For gestational age and birth weight, the highest prevalence was among infants <32 weeks gestation and infants <1500 gm. Case definitions varied; 41.8% of cases had an HC ≥ the 10th percentile for sex and gestational age. CONCLUSION: Differences in methods, population distribution of maternal/infant characteristics, and case definitions for microcephaly can contribute to the wide range of observed prevalence estimates across individual birth defects surveillance programs. Addressing these factors in the setting of Zika virus infection can improve the quality of prevalence estimates. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:972-982, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Epidemiological Monitoring , Microcephaly/epidemiology , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Zika Virus , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
8.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol ; 106(11): 983-988, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27891786

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obtaining accurate microcephaly prevalence is important given the recent association between microcephaly and Zika virus. Assessing the quality of data sources can guide surveillance programs as they focus their data collection efforts. The Utah Birth Defect Network (UBDN) has monitored microcephaly by data sources since 2003. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of reporting sources for microcephaly surveillance. METHODS: All reported cases of microcephaly among Utah mothers from 2003 to 2013 were clinically reviewed and confirmed. The UBDN database was linked to state vital records and hospital discharge data for analysis. Reporting sources were analyzed for positive predictive value and sensitivity. RESULTS: Of the 477 reported cases of microcephaly, 251 (52.6%) were confirmed as true cases. The UBDN identified 94 additional cases that were reported to the surveillance system as another birth defect, but were ultimately determined to be true microcephaly cases. The prevalence for microcephaly based on the UBDN medical record abstraction and clinical review was 8.2 per 10,000 live births. Data sources varied in the number and accuracy of reporting, but a case was more likely to be a true case if identified from multiple sources than from a single source. CONCLUSION: While some reporting sources are more likely to identify possible and true microcephaly cases, maintaining a multiple source methodology allows for more complete case ascertainment. Surveillance programs should conduct periodic assessments of data sources to ensure their systems are capturing all possible birth defects cases. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:983-988, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Disease Notification , Epidemiological Monitoring , Microcephaly/epidemiology , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Zika Virus , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Utah
9.
J Public Health Dent ; 76(4): 320-329, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27154283

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed and compared the prevalence and severity of dental caries and the prevalence of periodontal disease among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age (15-44 years) using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES (1999-2004). METHODS: Estimates were derived from a sample of 897 pregnant women and 3,971 nonpregnant women. Chi-square and two-sample t-tests were used to assess differences between groups stratified by age, race/ethnicity, education, and poverty. Bonferroni method was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: In general, there were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence estimates of dental caries and periodontal disease between pregnant women and nonpregnant women. However, results showed significant differences when stratified by sociodemographic characteristics. For example, the prevalence of untreated dental caries among women aged 15-24 years was significantly higher in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women (41 percent versus 24 percent, P = 0.001). Regardless of their pregnancy status, racial/ethnic minorities or women with less education or lower family income had higher prevalence of untreated dental caries, severity of dental caries, and periodontal disease compared to the respective reference groups of non-Hispanic whites or women with more education or higher family income. CONCLUSION: Results of this study show few clinical differences in dental caries and periodontal disease between pregnant and nonpregnant women but persistent disparities by sociodemographic characteristics. In order to reduce oral health disparities in the United States, it is important to improve access to oral health care particularly among vulnerable groups. Integrating oral health into the overall health care could benefit and improve women's oral health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , Periodontal Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Demography , Female , Humans , Nutrition Surveys , Pregnancy , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
11.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 11: E163, 2014 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25232750

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Oral diseases can be prevented or improved with regular dental visits. Our objective was to assess and compare national estimates on self-reported oral health conditions and dental visits among pregnant women and nonpregnant women of childbearing age by using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: We analyzed self-reported oral health information on 897 pregnant women and 3,971 nonpregnant women of childbearing age (15-44 years) from NHANES 1999-2004. We used χ(2) and 2-sample t tests to assess statistical differences between groups stratified by age, race/ethnicity, poverty, and education. We applied the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Our data show significant differences in self-reported oral health conditions and dental visits among women, regardless of pregnancy status, when stratified by selected sociodemographic characteristics. Significant differences were also found in self-reported oral health conditions and dental visits between pregnant and nonpregnant women, especially among young women, women from minority race/ethnicity groups, and women with less than high school education. CONCLUSION: We found disparities in self-reported oral health conditions and use of dental services among women regardless of pregnancy status. Results highlight the need to improve dental service use among US women of childbearing age, especially young pregnant women, those who are non-Hispanic black or Mexican American, and those with low family income or low education level. Prenatal visits could be used as an opportunity to encourage pregnant women to seek preventive dental care during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Nutrition Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , United States , Young Adult
12.
Am J Public Health ; 104(9): e14-23, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25033129

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the relationship between race/ethnicity and 27 major birth defects. METHODS: We pooled data from 12 population-based birth defects surveillance systems in the United States that included 13.5 million live births (1 of 3 of US births) from 1999 to 2007. Using Poisson regression, we calculated prevalence estimates for each birth defect and 13 racial/ethnic groupings, along with crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs). Non-Hispanic Whites served as the referent group. RESULTS: American Indians/Alaska Natives had a significantly higher and 50% or greater prevalence for 7 conditions (aPR = 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.89, 5.44 for anotia or microtia); aPRs of 1.5 to 2.1 for cleft lip, trisomy 18, and encephalocele, and lower, upper, and any limb deficiency). Cubans and Asians, especially Chinese and Asian Indians, had either significantly lower or similar prevalences of these defects compared with non-Hispanic Whites, with the exception of anotia or microtia among Chinese (aPR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.30, 3.33) and Filipinos (aPR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.10, 3.30) and tetralogy of Fallot among Vietnamese (aPR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.11, 2.32). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest population-based study to our knowledge to systematically examine the prevalence of a range of major birth defects across many racial/ethnic groups, including Asian and Hispanic subgroups. The relatively high prevalence of birth defects in American Indians/Alaska Natives warrants further attention.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/ethnology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Birth Certificates , Humans , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
13.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 211(4): 404.e1-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24681289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess maternal prenatal use of analgesics and risk of cardiovascular malformations (CVM) in the offspring. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study, a population-based case-control investigation of CVM, were used to examine selected isolated CVM diagnoses and maternal analgesic use during the periconceptional period (3 months before and after conception). We compared case and control infants on frequency of maternal use of analgesics and estimated adjusted odds ratios (adjORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with logistic regression models for specific CVM phenotypes. RESULTS: Frequency of periconceptional use of any analgesic was 52% among control mothers and 53% among case mothers. Analyses by CVM diagnoses identified an association of tetralogy of Fallot with maternal acetaminophen use (adjOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3) and dextrotransposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum with maternal nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use (adjOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-8.7). CONCLUSION: Analgesic use during the periconceptional period was not associated with CVM in the aggregate or with most phenotypes of CVM examined. Associations with 2 phenotypes of CVM may have occurred by chance. These findings warrant corroboration and further study, including further evaluation of the observed associations, the dose of analgesic taken, more specific timing of analgesic use, and indications for use.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Abnormalities/chemically induced , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Diabetes Care ; 36(10): 3033-9, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780951

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the burden of dysglycemia-abnormal glucose metabolism indicative of diabetes or high risk for diabetes-among U.S. women of childbearing age, focusing on differences by race/ethnicity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (1999-2008), we calculated the burden of dysglycemia (i.e., prediabetes or diabetes from measures of fasting glucose, A1C, and self-report) in nonpregnant women of childbearing age (15-49 years) by race/ethnicity status. We estimated prevalence risk ratios (PRRs) for dysglycemia in subpopulations stratified by BMI (measured as kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), using predicted marginal estimates and adjusting for age, waist circumference, C-reactive protein, and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: Based on data from 7,162 nonpregnant women, representing>59,000,000 women nationwide, 19% (95% CI 17.2-20.9) had some level of dysglycemia, with higher crude prevalence among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans vs. non-Hispanic whites (26.3% [95% CI 22.3-30.8] and 23.8% [19.5-28.7] vs. 16.8% [14.4-19.6], respectively). In women with BMI<25 kg/m2, dysglycemia prevalence was roughly twice as high in both non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans vs. non-Hispanic whites. This relative increase persisted in adjusted models (PRRadj 1.86 [1.16-2.98] and 2.23 [1.38-3.60] for non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans, respectively). For women with BMI 25-29.99 kg/m2, only non-Hispanic blacks showed increased prevalence vs. non-Hispanic whites (PRRadj 1.55 [1.03-2.34] and 1.28 [0.73-2.26] for non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans, respectively). In women with BMI>30 kg/m2, there was no significant increase in prevalence of dysglycemia by race/ethnicity category. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that dysglycemia affects a significant portion of U.S. women of childbearing age and that disparities by race/ethnicity are most prominent in the nonoverweight/nonobese.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus/ethnology , Prediabetic State/blood , Prediabetic State/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American , Age Factors , Black People , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Body Weight/physiology , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolism , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Middle Aged , Prediabetic State/metabolism , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Waist Circumference/physiology , White People , Young Adult
16.
J Pediatr ; 159(1): 70-78.e2, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21329942

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the proportion of major structural noncardiac anomalies identified with congenital heart defects (CHDs). STUDY DESIGN: Records of infants with CHDs in the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program who were born during the period 1968 through 2005 were classified as having isolated, syndromic, multiple CHD (ie, having an unrecognized pattern of multiple congenital anomalies or a recognized pattern of multiple congenital anomalies of unknown etiology), or laterality defects. Frequencies of associated noncardiac anomalies were obtained. RESULTS: We identified 7984 live-born and stillborn infants and fetuses with CHDs. Among them, 5695 (71.3%) had isolated, 1080 (13.5%) had multiple, 1048 (13.1%) had syndromic, and 161 (2.0%) had laterality defects. The percentage of multiple congenital anomalies was highest for case with atrial septal defects (18.5%), cardiac looping defects (17.2%), and conotruncal defects (16.0%), and cases with atrioventricular septal defects represented the highest percentages of those with syndromic CHDs (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Including those with syndromes and laterality defects, 28.7% of case infants with CHDs had associated major noncardiac malformations. Thus, infants with CHDs warrant careful examination for the presence of noncardiac anomalies.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Live Birth/epidemiology , Male , Maternal Age , Stillbirth/epidemiology
17.
Public Health Rep ; 122(5): 664-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17877314

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We assessed fetal death certificates (FDCs) as a source of surveillance for stillbirths with birth defects by linkage with data from the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), a population-based birth defects surveillance system. METHODS: Stillbirths with defects in MACDP were identified from 1994 through 2002 and linked to FDCs. Sensitivity of FDCs for capturing stillbirths with defects was estimated, and predictors for a case being reported were assessed. Concordance for selected variables from each data source was evaluated. RESILTS: Two hundred twenty-four of 257 stillbirths with birth defects in MACDP were linked to an FDC (linkage rate = 87.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 82.4, 91.0). Stillbirths of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic/other mothers were more likely to be issued an FDC (odds ratio [OR] = 5.6 [95% CI 1.9, 17.0] and 14.0 [95% CI 1.7, 114.0], respectively). Cases undergoing autopsy were more likely to be issued an FDC (OR = 3.2; 95% CI 1.1, 8.7). Performance of an amniocentesis was poorly recorded on FDCs. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of FDCs for selected classes of defects ranged from 10% to 70% and 25% to 93%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to FDCs, MACDP's active case identification improves the ascertainment of stillbirths with birth defects and the quality of certain recorded data.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Death Certificates , Fetal Death/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , United States/epidemiology
18.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol ; 73(10): 655-62, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16240376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Compared with analyses of temporal trends, analyses of seasonal variations in the prevalence of birth defects have been more limited and have provided less consistent information. Possible reasons for this lack of consistency in findings include differences in populations, underlying factors, seasons or climates, and methods of ascertainment and analysis between studies. This study examines possible seasonal variation in the prevalence of selected birth defects in a defined study population using graphical displays and three statistical methods. METHODS: Cases were infants and fetal deaths in nine birth defect groups born to residents of mothers in five counties of metropolitan Atlanta during the period of 1978-2001 and ascertained by the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program. These birth defect groups were anencephaly, spina bifida, total neural tube defects, cleft palate, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, anomalies of the pulmonary valve, anomalies of the aortic valve, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and congenital dislocation of the hip. We pooled monthly case counts and calculated monthly rates for each of these birth defect groups for five different birth periods: 1978-2001, 1978-1989, 1990-2001, 1990-1994, and 1995-2001. We applied the Cochran-Armitage test for trend to rule out homogeneity in pooled monthly rates. Data for each defect group were examined for possible seasonal (i.e., cyclical) variation overall and within the cited birth periods using the Hewitt-Rogerson test and the Walter-Elwood test. RESULTS: Graphical analyses of the pooled monthly rates showed no apparent seasonal patterns for any of the nine defect groups examined. Statistical tests for seasonality suggested possible seasonality for three defect groups: the Hewitt-Rogerson test was statistically significant for anencephaly (peak March-August, p = 0.048),while the Walter-Elwood test was significant for anomalies of the pulmonary valve (peak September, p = 0.02), and anomalies of the aortic valve (peak July, p = 0.039). With both methods, the results appeared to be influenced by the choice of time (i.e., birth) period. Results for anomalies of the pulmonary valve were statistically significant and more consistent with all tests in most of the time periods examined. CONCLUSIONS: Graphical analyses and basic statistical tests for seasonality showed no consistent evidence of seasonality for any of the nine defect groups examined, except for anomalies of the pulmonary valve. The two basic statistical methods coupled by a trend test for exploring seasonal patterns of the prevalence of birth defects can be useful for preliminary analyses of possible seasonal patterns. However, these methods have some limitations: (1) an assumption of no strong temporal trend over the study years, and (2) the results can vary by time period chosen. For specific hypotheses regarding seasonality, a more robust analytical approach such as time-series analysis might be more appropriate.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Seasons , Anencephaly/epidemiology , Aorta/pathology , Aortic Valve/abnormalities , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Female , Georgia , Hip/abnormalities , Humans , Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome/epidemiology , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Models, Statistical , Neural Tube Defects/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pulmonary Valve/abnormalities , Regression Analysis , Software , Spinal Dysraphism/epidemiology , Time Factors
19.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol ; 70(9): 565-71, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15368554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of prenatal diagnosis on the live birth prevalence of Down syndrome (trisomy 21) has been described. This study examines the prevalence of Down syndrome before (1990-1993) and after inclusion of prenatally diagnosed cases (1994-1999) in a population-based registry of birth defects in metropolitan Atlanta. METHODS: We identified infants and spontaneous fetal deaths with Down syndrome (n = 387), and pregnancies electively terminated after a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome (n = 139) from 1990 to 1999 among residents of metropolitan Atlanta from a population-based registry of birth defects, the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP). Only diagnoses of full trisomy 21 were included. Denominator information on live births was derived from State of Georgia birth certificate data. We compared the prevalence of Down syndrome by calendar period (1990-1993, 1994-1999), maternal age (<35 years, 35+ years), and race/ethnicity (White, Black, other), using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: During the period when case ascertainment was based only on hospitals (1990-1993), the prevalence of Down syndrome was 8.4 per 10,000 live births when pregnancy terminations were excluded and 8.8 per 10,000 when terminations were included. When case ascertainment also included perinatal offices (1994-1999), the prevalence of Down syndrome was 10.1 per 10,000 when terminations were excluded and 15.3 when terminations were included. During 1990-1993, the prevalence of Down syndrome was 24.7 per 10,000 among offspring to women 35+ years of age compared to 6.8 per 10,000 among offspring to women <35 years of age (rate ratio [RR] = 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.53-5.28). During 1994-1999, the prevalence of Down syndrome was 55.3 per 10,000 among offspring to women 35+ years compared to 8.5 per 10,000 among offspring to women <35 years (RR = 6.55, 95% CI = 5.36-7.99). There was no statistically significant variation in the prevalence of Down syndrome by race/ethnicity within maternal age and period of birth strata. During 1994-1999, the proportion of cases that were electively terminated was greater for women 35+ years compared to women <35 years (RR = 5.10, 95% CI = 3.14-8.28), and lower for Blacks compared to Whites among women 35+ years of age (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.16-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, perinatal offices have become an important source of cases of Down syndrome for MACDP, contributing at least 34% of cases among pregnancies in women 35+ years of age. Variation in the prevalence of Down syndrome by race/ethnicity, before or after inclusion of cases ascertained from perinatal offices, was not statistically significant. Among Down syndrome pregnancies in mothers 35+ years we found a lower proportion of elective termination among Black women compared to White women. We suggest that future reports on the prevalence of Down syndrome by race/ethnicity take into account possible variations in the frequency of prenatal diagnosis or elective termination by race/ethnicity.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Down Syndrome/epidemiology , Prenatal Diagnosis , Abortion, Induced/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Induced/trends , Adult , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Registries/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data
20.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 13(1): 17-23, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15006274

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cigarette smoking by U.S. women in the 1940s and 1950s caused large increases in smoking-related lung disease among women. To determine the magnitude of these increases, we compared the mortality trends for males and females in the United States for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer for 1968-1999. METHODS: We used the national mortality data files compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics of the CDC and U.S. census data to calculate age-adjusted (2000) death rates for COPD, lung cancer, and all causes. RESULTS: COPD death rate for females increased by 382% from 1968 through 1999, whereas for males it increased by 27% during the same period. As a result, the COPD death rate for U.S. females is approaching that for males. The lung cancer death rate for females increased by 266% from 1968 to 1999, whereas for males, it increased by 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians, women, and groups interested in women's health issues need to be aware of these trends and target prevention strategies toward females.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Women's Health , Female , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Mortality/trends , Sex Distribution , Smoking/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...