Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Radiol ; 26(4): 921-31, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26194455

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus and provide updated recommendations on liver MR imaging and the clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents. METHODS: The European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) formed a multinational European panel of experts, selected on the basis of a literature review and their leadership in the field of liver MR imaging. A modified Delphi process was adopted to draft a list of statements. Descriptive and Cronbach's statistics were used to rate levels of agreement and internal reliability of the consensus. RESULTS: Three Delphi rounds were conducted and 76 statements composed on MR technique (n = 17), clinical application of liver-specific contrast agents in benign, focal liver lesions (n = 7), malignant liver lesions in non-cirrhotic (n = 9) and in cirrhotic patients (n = 18), diffuse and vascular liver diseases (n = 12), and bile ducts (n = 13). The overall mean score of agreement was 4.84 (SD ±0.17). Full consensus was reached in 22 % of all statements in all working groups, with no full consensus reached on diffuse and vascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus provided updated recommendations on the methodology, and clinical indications, of MRI with liver specific contrast agents in the study of liver diseases. KEY POINTS: • Liver-specific contrast agents are recommended in MRI of the liver. • The hepatobiliary phase improves the detection and characterization of hepatocellular lesions. • Liver-specific contrast agents can improve the detection of HCC.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Liver Diseases/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adenoma, Liver Cell/pathology , Bile Ducts/pathology , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Radiography, Abdominal , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Invest Radiol ; 38(12): 750-60, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14627892

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: GdDOTP5- is a highly charged, bone-seeking paramagnetic complex that could potentially detect bone lesions by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To date, its pharmacokinetics, effects on organ relaxivity, and interaction with hydroxyapatite (HA) has not been described. METHODS: Liver, kidney, and bone MRI images were obtained on male white rabbits after the administration of GdDOTP5- or a gold standard MRI contrast agent, GdDTPA2-. Parallel in vitro experiments quantified the effect of HA binding on GdDOTP5- -induced changes in relaxivity. RESULTS: The 2 compounds showed similar MRI enhancements in visceral tissues, but no enhancement of bone was evident with GdDOTP5- despite confirmation of bone and HA binding of the radioactive 153SmDOTP5- and 111InDOTP5- derivatives. In vitro experiments demonstrated that GdDOTP5--induced changes in relaxivity were silenced upon HA binding but could be recovered by acid elution of the complex. CONCLUSIONS: HA binding assays revealed that GdDOTP5- is essentially MR silent when bound to bone, likely because of the exclusion of all outer sphere water molecules from the surface of the complex. These data suggest a novel strategy for creating highly sensitive, switchable MRI contrast agents.


Subject(s)
Gadolinium DTPA/pharmacokinetics , Gadolinium/pharmacokinetics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Animals , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Hydroxyapatites/metabolism , Kidney/metabolism , Liver/metabolism , Male , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Rabbits , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Tissue Distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL