ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Bovine genital campylobacteriosis (BGC) is a venereal and subclinical disease that affects the fertility of cattle herds, and it is caused by Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis . This study selected peptides mimetic to the BGC-causing agent from a phage library. Phage display is a technique that applies bacteriophage libraries that reveal peptides fused to the viral capsid in biological selections against target proteins. Biopannings were performed for biological selection in the phage library using rabbit hyperimmune serum and C. fetus subsp. venerealis protein extract. Five selected heptapeptides were considered mimetic to Cfv-NCTC 10354 based on the results of bioinformatics analysis and assays with hyperimmune serum and cervicovaginal mucus obtained from heifers. ALASLPL and LSYLFPP were the most reactive peptides and considered promising as possible mimetic immunogens for C. fetus subsp. venerealis.
RESUMO: Campilobacteriose Genital Bovina (CGB) é uma doença venérea e subclínica que causa problemas reprodutivos em rebanhos, causada por Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis. Este trabalho teve como objetivo selecionar peptídeos miméticos ao agente da CGB de uma biblioteca de fagos. Phage display é uma técnica que aplica bibliotecas de bacteriófagos que expõem peptídeos fusionados ao capsídeo viral em seleções biológicas contra proteínas alvo. Biopannings foram realizados para seleção biológica na biblioteca de fagos por meio de soro hiperimune de coelho e extrato proteico de C. fetus subsp. venerealis. Cinco heptapeptídeos selecionados foram considerados miméticos para Cfv-NCTC 10354 a partir de análises de bioinformática e ensaios com soro hiperimune e muco cérvico-vaginal de novilhas. ALASLPL e LSYLFPP foram os peptídeos mais reativos e considerados promissores como possíveis imunógenos miméticos para C. fetus subsp. venerealis.
ABSTRACT
Susceptibility pattern of 45 Campylobacter spp.isolates 16 C. jejuni, eight C. coli, and 21 C. fetus isolated from different animal species in Brazil to twelve antimicrobial agents was determined. All Campylobacter spp. isolates were susceptible to gentamicin, sulfadiazine, and sulfamethoxazole. C. jejuni and C. coli were also sensitive to chloramphenicol, whereas all C. fetus strains were susceptible to kanamycin. Cefoperazone showed the highest percentage of resistance among C. jejuni (68.75%), followed by nalidixic acid (31.25%), ampicillin (37.50%), tetracycline (37.50%), erythromycin (12.50%), and kanamycin (6.25%). Likewise, cefoperazone exhibited the highest percentage of resistance among C. coli (75.00%), followed by nalidixic acid (50.00%), tetracycline (50.00%), erythromycin (37.50%), ampicillin (12.50%), and kanamycin (12.50%). Among C. fetus strains, nalidixic acid showed the highest resistance rate (85.71%), followed by cefoperazone (71.43%), tetracycline (42.86%), ampicillin (19.05%), chloramphenicol (9.52%), and erythromycin (4.76%). Therefore, it was found that the majority of Campylobacter spp. isolated from animals was sensitive to gentamycin, chloramphenicol, kanamacyn, and sulfonamides; however, a high proportion of the strains showed reduced susceptibility to nalidixic acid, ampicillin, cefoperazone, and tetracycline. Moreover, C. coli and C. fetus isolates showed a high percentage of multidrug resistant strains.(AU)
O padrão de sensibilidade de 45 amostras de Campylobacter spp, incluindo 16 amostras de C. jejuni, 8 de C. coli e 21 C. fetus, isoladas de diferentes espécies de animais do Brasil, foi determinado para doze antimicrobianos. Todas as amostras de Campylobacter spp foram sensíveis à gentamicina, sulfadiazina e sulfametoxazol. C. jejuni e C. coli foram também sensíveis ao cloranfenicol, enquanto todas as amostras de C. fetus foram sensíveis à canamicina. Cefoperazona mostrou o maior percentual de resistência entre C. jejuni (68,75%), seguido pelo ácido nalidíxico (31,25%), ampicilina (37,50%), tetraciclina (37,50%), eritromicina (12,50%) e canamicina (6,25%). Similarmente, cefoperazona também exibiu o maior percentual de resistência entre as amostras de C. coli (75,00%), seguido pelo ácido nalidíxico (50,00%), tetraciclina (50,00%), eritromicina (37,50%), ampicilina (12,50%) e canamicina (12,50%). Entre os isolados de C. fetus, ácido nalidíxico apresentou maior taxa de resistência (85,71%), seguido de cefoperazona (71,43%), tetraciclina (42,86%), ampicilina (19,05%), cloranfenicol (9,52%) e eritromicina (4,76%). Assim, os nossos resultados mostraram que a maioria das amostras de Campylobacter spp isolados de animais foram sensíveis à gentamicina, cloranfenicol, canamicina e sulfonamidas. No entanto, uma proporção elevada das amostras apresentou susceptibilidade reduzida ao ácido nalidíxico, ampicilina, cefoperazona e tetraciclina. Além disso, C. coli e C. fetus mostraram uma alta porcentagem de amostras resistentes a múltiplas drogas.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Dogs , Campylobacter , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Callitrichinae , Chickens , Gentamicins , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , SwineABSTRACT
This study aimed to determine the susceptibility profile of Brazilian Brucella abortus isolates from cattle to eight antimicrobial agents that are recommended for the treatment of human brucellosis and to correlate the susceptibility patterns with origin, biotype and MLVA16-genotype of the strains. Screening of 147 B. abortus strains showed 100% sensitivity to doxycycline and ofloxacin, one (0.68%) strain resistant to ciprofloxacin, two strains (1.36%) resistant to streptomycin, two strains (1.36%) resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and five strains (3.40%) resistant to gentamicin. For rifampicin, three strains (2.04%) were resistant and 54 strains (36.73%) showed reduced sensitivity. Two strains were considered multidrug resistant. In conclusion, the majority of B. abortus strains isolated from cattle in Brazil were sensitive to the antimicrobials commonly used for the treatment of human brucellosis; however, a considerable proportion of strains showed reduced susceptibility to rifampicin and two strains were considered multidrug resistant. Moreover, there was no correlation among the drug susceptibility pattern, origin, biotype and MLVA16-genotypes of these strains.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Brucella abortus/drug effects , Brucellosis/drug therapy , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Rifampin/pharmacology , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Brazil/epidemiology , Brucella abortus/classification , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucella abortus/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Cattle , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Doxycycline/pharmacology , Genotype , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Streptomycin/pharmacology , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brucellosis caused by Brucella abortus is one of the most important zoonoses in the world. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA16) has been shown be a useful tool to epidemiological traceback studies in B. abortus infection. Thus, the present study aimed (i) to evaluate the genetic diversity of B. abortus isolates from a brucellosis outbreak, and (ii) to investigate the in vivo stability of the MLVA16 markers. RESULTS: Three-hundred and seventy-five clinical samples, including 275 vaginal swabs and 100 milk samples, were cultured from a brucellosis outbreak in a cattle herd, which adopted RB51 vaccination and test-and-slaughter policies. Thirty-seven B. abortus isolates were obtained, eight from milk and twenty-nine from post-partum/abortion vaginal swabs, which were submitted to biotyping and genotyping by MLVA16. Twelve B. abortus isolates obtained from vaginal swabs were identified as RB51. Twenty four isolates, seven obtained from milk samples and seventeen from vaginal swabs, were identified as B. abortus biovar 3, while one isolate from vaginal swabs was identified as B. abortus biovar 1. Three distinct genotypes were observed during the brucellosis outbreak: RB observed in all isolates identified as RB51; W observed in all B. abortus biovar 3 isolates; and Z observed in the single B. abortus biovar 1 isolate. Epidemiological and molecular data show that the B. abortus biovar 1 genotype Z strain is not related to the B. abortus biovar 3 genotype W isolates, and represents a new introduction B. abortus during the outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study on typing of multiple clinical B. abortus isolates from the same outbreak over a sixteen month period indicate the in vivo stability of MLVA16 markers, a low genetic diversity among B. abortus isolates and the usefulness of MLVA16 for epidemiological studies of bovine brucellosis.